药学学习者自我反思和教师评价在经验轮转中使用单点准则的比较。

Innovations in pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-01-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v15i4.5733
Jennifer A Nowak, Carrie N Baker, Riley D Bowers
{"title":"药学学习者自我反思和教师评价在经验轮转中使用单点准则的比较。","authors":"Jennifer A Nowak, Carrie N Baker, Riley D Bowers","doi":"10.24926/iip.v15i4.5733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Development of successful, practice-ready pharmacists includes ensuring learners are self-aware and able to reflect on knowledge, skills, and abilities. Though evidence indicates reflective practices are important in pharmacy education, there is a general lack of structure for implementation of reflective practices. The primary objective of this study was to compare learner self-evaluations to preceptor and pharmacy resident evaluations for scored learning activities completed on experiential rotations to assess consistency of student self-reflections. <i>Methods:</i> This study compared learner self-evaluations to preceptor and pharmacy resident evaluations using a single-point rubric for three types of assignments completed during experiential rotations at a community teaching hospital. These assignments included clinical presentations, patient counseling, and written drug information responses. Data were collected via retrospective review of completed, de-identified evaluations. The primary endpoint was differences in overall scores between students and evaluators, analyzed via paired T-test. <i>Findings:</i> A total of 68 learner evaluations were reviewed, with a majority (89.7%) completed by students on Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences. Overall, no significant differences emerged between student and preceptor evaluator scores, indicating that students were able to consistently self-reflect. <i>Conclusion:</i> Pharmacy students on experiential rotations demonstrated consistency in self-scoring and evaluation with preceptors on assignments related to presentations, drug information responses, and patient counseling when using single-point rubrics to self-evaluate.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Pharmacy Learner Self-Reflection and Preceptor Evaluations Using a Single-Point Rubric during Experiential Rotations.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer A Nowak, Carrie N Baker, Riley D Bowers\",\"doi\":\"10.24926/iip.v15i4.5733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Development of successful, practice-ready pharmacists includes ensuring learners are self-aware and able to reflect on knowledge, skills, and abilities. Though evidence indicates reflective practices are important in pharmacy education, there is a general lack of structure for implementation of reflective practices. The primary objective of this study was to compare learner self-evaluations to preceptor and pharmacy resident evaluations for scored learning activities completed on experiential rotations to assess consistency of student self-reflections. <i>Methods:</i> This study compared learner self-evaluations to preceptor and pharmacy resident evaluations using a single-point rubric for three types of assignments completed during experiential rotations at a community teaching hospital. These assignments included clinical presentations, patient counseling, and written drug information responses. Data were collected via retrospective review of completed, de-identified evaluations. The primary endpoint was differences in overall scores between students and evaluators, analyzed via paired T-test. <i>Findings:</i> A total of 68 learner evaluations were reviewed, with a majority (89.7%) completed by students on Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences. Overall, no significant differences emerged between student and preceptor evaluator scores, indicating that students were able to consistently self-reflect. <i>Conclusion:</i> Pharmacy students on experiential rotations demonstrated consistency in self-scoring and evaluation with preceptors on assignments related to presentations, drug information responses, and patient counseling when using single-point rubrics to self-evaluate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations in pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations in pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v15i4.5733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v15i4.5733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:培养成功的、准备好实践的药剂师包括确保学习者有自我意识,能够反思知识、技能和能力。尽管有证据表明反思性实践在药学教育中很重要,但普遍缺乏实施反思性实践的结构。本研究的主要目的是比较学生自我评价与辅导员和药房住院医师对经验轮转完成的得分学习活动的评价,以评估学生自我反思的一致性。方法:本研究采用单点评分法对社区教学医院体验轮转期间完成的三种类型的作业进行了学习者自我评价与导师和药房住院医师评价的比较。这些作业包括临床报告、患者咨询和书面药物信息回复。通过对完成的、去识别的评估进行回顾性审查收集数据。主要终点是学生和评估者总分的差异,通过配对t检验进行分析。结果:共审查了68份学习者评估,其中大部分(89.7%)由高级药学实践经验的学生完成。总体而言,学生和导师评估分数之间没有显著差异,这表明学生能够持续地自我反思。结论:当使用单点标准进行自我评价时,体验轮转的药学学生在自我评分和评价方面与导师表现出一致性,这些作业涉及陈述、药物信息反应和患者咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Pharmacy Learner Self-Reflection and Preceptor Evaluations Using a Single-Point Rubric during Experiential Rotations.

Background: Development of successful, practice-ready pharmacists includes ensuring learners are self-aware and able to reflect on knowledge, skills, and abilities. Though evidence indicates reflective practices are important in pharmacy education, there is a general lack of structure for implementation of reflective practices. The primary objective of this study was to compare learner self-evaluations to preceptor and pharmacy resident evaluations for scored learning activities completed on experiential rotations to assess consistency of student self-reflections. Methods: This study compared learner self-evaluations to preceptor and pharmacy resident evaluations using a single-point rubric for three types of assignments completed during experiential rotations at a community teaching hospital. These assignments included clinical presentations, patient counseling, and written drug information responses. Data were collected via retrospective review of completed, de-identified evaluations. The primary endpoint was differences in overall scores between students and evaluators, analyzed via paired T-test. Findings: A total of 68 learner evaluations were reviewed, with a majority (89.7%) completed by students on Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences. Overall, no significant differences emerged between student and preceptor evaluator scores, indicating that students were able to consistently self-reflect. Conclusion: Pharmacy students on experiential rotations demonstrated consistency in self-scoring and evaluation with preceptors on assignments related to presentations, drug information responses, and patient counseling when using single-point rubrics to self-evaluate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信