处理全身PET/CT研究中的意外发现:平衡伦理考虑和资源限制。

Georgios I Angelis, Katie Ockenden, Steven R Meikle, Fernando Calamante
{"title":"处理全身PET/CT研究中的意外发现:平衡伦理考虑和资源限制。","authors":"Georgios I Angelis, Katie Ockenden, Steven R Meikle, Fernando Calamante","doi":"10.1186/s41824-025-00251-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Total body positron emission tomography (TB-PET) represents a major advancement in molecular imaging. While this technology expands the capabilities of PET imaging for both research and clinical applications, it also introduces significant ethical and operational challenges, particularly in the management of incidental findings. Current ethical and regulatory guidance acknowledge the need to address incidental findings that arise during research studies, but often provides ambiguous or insufficient direction. This leaves institutions to independently balance participant safety, ethical responsibilities, and resource constraints. Using the Australian National Total Body PET Facility as a case study, this article explores strategies for managing incidental findings in PET/CT research. By comparing research workflows with clinical practices, we highlight critical differences and propose a practical framework to help institutions establish ethically sound and feasible protocols. This framework aims to balance the duty of care to the participant with the logistical demands of PET research, contributing to the ongoing discourse on ethical imaging practices and offering guidance for managers of TB-PET research facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":519909,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI reports","volume":"9 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing incidental findings in total body PET/CT studies: balancing ethical considerations and resource constraints.\",\"authors\":\"Georgios I Angelis, Katie Ockenden, Steven R Meikle, Fernando Calamante\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41824-025-00251-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Total body positron emission tomography (TB-PET) represents a major advancement in molecular imaging. While this technology expands the capabilities of PET imaging for both research and clinical applications, it also introduces significant ethical and operational challenges, particularly in the management of incidental findings. Current ethical and regulatory guidance acknowledge the need to address incidental findings that arise during research studies, but often provides ambiguous or insufficient direction. This leaves institutions to independently balance participant safety, ethical responsibilities, and resource constraints. Using the Australian National Total Body PET Facility as a case study, this article explores strategies for managing incidental findings in PET/CT research. By comparing research workflows with clinical practices, we highlight critical differences and propose a practical framework to help institutions establish ethically sound and feasible protocols. This framework aims to balance the duty of care to the participant with the logistical demands of PET research, contributing to the ongoing discourse on ethical imaging practices and offering guidance for managers of TB-PET research facilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJNMMI reports\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095698/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJNMMI reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-025-00251-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-025-00251-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全身正电子发射断层扫描(TB-PET)是分子成像技术的一项重大进展。虽然这项技术扩大了PET成像在研究和临床应用中的能力,但它也带来了重大的伦理和操作挑战,特别是在意外发现的管理方面。目前的伦理和监管指南承认有必要解决研究过程中出现的偶然发现,但往往提供模棱两可或不充分的指导。这使得机构需要独立地平衡参与者的安全、道德责任和资源约束。本文以澳大利亚国家全身PET设备为例,探讨了处理PET/CT研究中意外发现的策略。通过比较研究工作流程与临床实践,我们强调了关键的差异,并提出了一个实用的框架,以帮助机构建立道德健全和可行的协议。该框架旨在平衡对参与者的注意义务与PET研究的后勤需求,有助于正在进行的关于伦理成像实践的讨论,并为TB-PET研究设施的管理人员提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Managing incidental findings in total body PET/CT studies: balancing ethical considerations and resource constraints.

Total body positron emission tomography (TB-PET) represents a major advancement in molecular imaging. While this technology expands the capabilities of PET imaging for both research and clinical applications, it also introduces significant ethical and operational challenges, particularly in the management of incidental findings. Current ethical and regulatory guidance acknowledge the need to address incidental findings that arise during research studies, but often provides ambiguous or insufficient direction. This leaves institutions to independently balance participant safety, ethical responsibilities, and resource constraints. Using the Australian National Total Body PET Facility as a case study, this article explores strategies for managing incidental findings in PET/CT research. By comparing research workflows with clinical practices, we highlight critical differences and propose a practical framework to help institutions establish ethically sound and feasible protocols. This framework aims to balance the duty of care to the participant with the logistical demands of PET research, contributing to the ongoing discourse on ethical imaging practices and offering guidance for managers of TB-PET research facilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信