{"title":"无套管、非隧道双腔导管的导管相关感染:回顾性队列中颈内静脉与股动脉部位的发生率和危险因素","authors":"Tanwaporn Phatpituk, Suthiya Anumas, Aphichat Chatkrailert","doi":"10.1111/hdi.13261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uncuffed, non-tunneled dual-lumen catheters are often required for kidney replacement therapy (KRT), but catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) remain a serious complication. Whether the jugular site poses a lower CRBSI risk than the femoral site is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with uncuffed, non-tunneled dual-lumen catheters. CRBSI incidence, catheter dwelling time, and mortality rates were compared between jugular and femoral sites. Regression analyses identified CRBSI risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 572 patients were included in the study. The incidence proportion of CRBSI was 3.5% in both the femoral and jugular groups (10 of 286 patients in each group; p = 1.0). The incidence rates of CRBSI were 1.7 and 0.9 per 1000 patient-days for the femoral and jugular sites, respectively (p = 0.154). The median catheter dwelling time was significantly longer for jugular catheters (25 days) compared to femoral catheters (12 days; p < 0.001). The 30-day incidence proportion of death at the jugular site was significantly lower than at the femoral site (0.105 vs. 0.608, p < 0.001). Pre-existing cerebrovascular disease and congestive heart failure were identified as significant risk factors for CRBSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For uncuffed, non-tunneled dual-lumen catheters used for dialysis vascular access, the jugular insertion site does not demonstrate a reduced risk of CRBSI compared to the femoral site. However, jugular catheter placement is associated with a longer dwelling time and a lower mortality rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":94027,"journal":{"name":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catheter-Related Infection in Uncuffed, Non-Tunneled Dual-Lumen Catheters: Incidence and Risk Factors by Internal Jugular Versus Femoral Site in a Retrospective Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Tanwaporn Phatpituk, Suthiya Anumas, Aphichat Chatkrailert\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hdi.13261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uncuffed, non-tunneled dual-lumen catheters are often required for kidney replacement therapy (KRT), but catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) remain a serious complication. Whether the jugular site poses a lower CRBSI risk than the femoral site is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with uncuffed, non-tunneled dual-lumen catheters. CRBSI incidence, catheter dwelling time, and mortality rates were compared between jugular and femoral sites. Regression analyses identified CRBSI risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 572 patients were included in the study. The incidence proportion of CRBSI was 3.5% in both the femoral and jugular groups (10 of 286 patients in each group; p = 1.0). The incidence rates of CRBSI were 1.7 and 0.9 per 1000 patient-days for the femoral and jugular sites, respectively (p = 0.154). The median catheter dwelling time was significantly longer for jugular catheters (25 days) compared to femoral catheters (12 days; p < 0.001). The 30-day incidence proportion of death at the jugular site was significantly lower than at the femoral site (0.105 vs. 0.608, p < 0.001). Pre-existing cerebrovascular disease and congestive heart failure were identified as significant risk factors for CRBSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For uncuffed, non-tunneled dual-lumen catheters used for dialysis vascular access, the jugular insertion site does not demonstrate a reduced risk of CRBSI compared to the femoral site. However, jugular catheter placement is associated with a longer dwelling time and a lower mortality rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.13261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.13261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Catheter-Related Infection in Uncuffed, Non-Tunneled Dual-Lumen Catheters: Incidence and Risk Factors by Internal Jugular Versus Femoral Site in a Retrospective Cohort.
Background: Uncuffed, non-tunneled dual-lumen catheters are often required for kidney replacement therapy (KRT), but catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) remain a serious complication. Whether the jugular site poses a lower CRBSI risk than the femoral site is unclear.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with uncuffed, non-tunneled dual-lumen catheters. CRBSI incidence, catheter dwelling time, and mortality rates were compared between jugular and femoral sites. Regression analyses identified CRBSI risk factors.
Results: A total of 572 patients were included in the study. The incidence proportion of CRBSI was 3.5% in both the femoral and jugular groups (10 of 286 patients in each group; p = 1.0). The incidence rates of CRBSI were 1.7 and 0.9 per 1000 patient-days for the femoral and jugular sites, respectively (p = 0.154). The median catheter dwelling time was significantly longer for jugular catheters (25 days) compared to femoral catheters (12 days; p < 0.001). The 30-day incidence proportion of death at the jugular site was significantly lower than at the femoral site (0.105 vs. 0.608, p < 0.001). Pre-existing cerebrovascular disease and congestive heart failure were identified as significant risk factors for CRBSI.
Conclusion: For uncuffed, non-tunneled dual-lumen catheters used for dialysis vascular access, the jugular insertion site does not demonstrate a reduced risk of CRBSI compared to the femoral site. However, jugular catheter placement is associated with a longer dwelling time and a lower mortality rate.