Barbara Linz, Thomas Pühler, Julia Vogler, Christina Paitazoglou, Roland Richard Tilz, Stephan Ensminger, Buntaro Fujita
{"title":"[植入式心律转复除颤器在左心室辅助装置患者中的应用:目前的争议]。","authors":"Barbara Linz, Thomas Pühler, Julia Vogler, Christina Paitazoglou, Roland Richard Tilz, Stephan Ensminger, Buntaro Fujita","doi":"10.1007/s00399-025-01081-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are used to treat patients with advanced heart failure. A significant fraction of these patients simultaneously fulfill the indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>It is currently unclear whether patients require an ICD after LVAD implantation. In addition, it remains uncertain whether patients with an LVAD are suitable candidates for a subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The aforementioned questions were addresses using studies, case reports, and our own experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Studies have yielded varying findings on the above question. While some investigations suggest that an ICD may also be beneficial for LVAD patients, other studies highlight potential risks with limited benefit. This underscores the complexity of clinical decision-making in this specific patient cohort. S‑ICDs can suffer from significant functional impairments after LVAD implantation, making this combination controversial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to the inconclusiveness of current studies, a general recommendation regarding the role of an ICD (both conventional and S‑ICD) after LVAD implantation cannot be established at this time. Therefore, it should involve individualized and interdisciplinary decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":52403,"journal":{"name":"Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie","volume":" ","pages":"126-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with left ventricular assist devices : Current controversies].\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Linz, Thomas Pühler, Julia Vogler, Christina Paitazoglou, Roland Richard Tilz, Stephan Ensminger, Buntaro Fujita\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00399-025-01081-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are used to treat patients with advanced heart failure. A significant fraction of these patients simultaneously fulfill the indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>It is currently unclear whether patients require an ICD after LVAD implantation. In addition, it remains uncertain whether patients with an LVAD are suitable candidates for a subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The aforementioned questions were addresses using studies, case reports, and our own experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Studies have yielded varying findings on the above question. While some investigations suggest that an ICD may also be beneficial for LVAD patients, other studies highlight potential risks with limited benefit. This underscores the complexity of clinical decision-making in this specific patient cohort. S‑ICDs can suffer from significant functional impairments after LVAD implantation, making this combination controversial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to the inconclusiveness of current studies, a general recommendation regarding the role of an ICD (both conventional and S‑ICD) after LVAD implantation cannot be established at this time. Therefore, it should involve individualized and interdisciplinary decision making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"126-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-025-01081-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-025-01081-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with left ventricular assist devices : Current controversies].
Background: Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are used to treat patients with advanced heart failure. A significant fraction of these patients simultaneously fulfill the indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).
Objectives: It is currently unclear whether patients require an ICD after LVAD implantation. In addition, it remains uncertain whether patients with an LVAD are suitable candidates for a subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD).
Materials and methods: The aforementioned questions were addresses using studies, case reports, and our own experience.
Results: Studies have yielded varying findings on the above question. While some investigations suggest that an ICD may also be beneficial for LVAD patients, other studies highlight potential risks with limited benefit. This underscores the complexity of clinical decision-making in this specific patient cohort. S‑ICDs can suffer from significant functional impairments after LVAD implantation, making this combination controversial.
Conclusions: Due to the inconclusiveness of current studies, a general recommendation regarding the role of an ICD (both conventional and S‑ICD) after LVAD implantation cannot be established at this time. Therefore, it should involve individualized and interdisciplinary decision making.
期刊介绍:
Mit wissenschaftlichen Original- und Übersichtsarbeiten, Berichten über moderne Operationstechniken und experimentelle Methoden ist die Zeitschrift Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie ein Diskussionsforum für Themen wie:
- Zelluläre Elektrophysiologie
- Theoretische Elektrophysiologie
- Klinische Elektrophysiologie
- Angewandte Herzschrittmachertherapie
- Bradykarde und tachykarde Herzrhythmusstörungen
- Plötzlicher Herztod und Risikostratifikation
- Elektrokardiographie
- Elektromedizinische Technologie
- Experimentelle und klinische Pharmakologie
- Herzchirurgie bei Herzrhythmusstörungen
Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgruppen Herzschrittmacher und Arrhythmie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie - Herz und Kreislaufforschung e.V. (DGK) sowie Stellungnahmen und praktische Hinweise runden das breite Spektrum dieser Zeitschrift ab.
Interessensgebiete: Kardiologie, Herzschrittmachertherapie, Herzschrittmachertechnologie, klinische Elektrophysiologie