[植入式心律转复除颤器在左心室辅助装置患者中的应用:目前的争议]。

Q4 Medicine
Barbara Linz, Thomas Pühler, Julia Vogler, Christina Paitazoglou, Roland Richard Tilz, Stephan Ensminger, Buntaro Fujita
{"title":"[植入式心律转复除颤器在左心室辅助装置患者中的应用:目前的争议]。","authors":"Barbara Linz, Thomas Pühler, Julia Vogler, Christina Paitazoglou, Roland Richard Tilz, Stephan Ensminger, Buntaro Fujita","doi":"10.1007/s00399-025-01081-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are used to treat patients with advanced heart failure. A significant fraction of these patients simultaneously fulfill the indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>It is currently unclear whether patients require an ICD after LVAD implantation. In addition, it remains uncertain whether patients with an LVAD are suitable candidates for a subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The aforementioned questions were addresses using studies, case reports, and our own experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Studies have yielded varying findings on the above question. While some investigations suggest that an ICD may also be beneficial for LVAD patients, other studies highlight potential risks with limited benefit. This underscores the complexity of clinical decision-making in this specific patient cohort. S‑ICDs can suffer from significant functional impairments after LVAD implantation, making this combination controversial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to the inconclusiveness of current studies, a general recommendation regarding the role of an ICD (both conventional and S‑ICD) after LVAD implantation cannot be established at this time. Therefore, it should involve individualized and interdisciplinary decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":52403,"journal":{"name":"Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie","volume":" ","pages":"126-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with left ventricular assist devices : Current controversies].\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Linz, Thomas Pühler, Julia Vogler, Christina Paitazoglou, Roland Richard Tilz, Stephan Ensminger, Buntaro Fujita\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00399-025-01081-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are used to treat patients with advanced heart failure. A significant fraction of these patients simultaneously fulfill the indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>It is currently unclear whether patients require an ICD after LVAD implantation. In addition, it remains uncertain whether patients with an LVAD are suitable candidates for a subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The aforementioned questions were addresses using studies, case reports, and our own experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Studies have yielded varying findings on the above question. While some investigations suggest that an ICD may also be beneficial for LVAD patients, other studies highlight potential risks with limited benefit. This underscores the complexity of clinical decision-making in this specific patient cohort. S‑ICDs can suffer from significant functional impairments after LVAD implantation, making this combination controversial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to the inconclusiveness of current studies, a general recommendation regarding the role of an ICD (both conventional and S‑ICD) after LVAD implantation cannot be established at this time. Therefore, it should involve individualized and interdisciplinary decision making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"126-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-025-01081-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-025-01081-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:左心室辅助装置(LVAD)用于治疗晚期心力衰竭患者。这些患者中有很大一部分同时符合植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)的指征。目的:目前尚不清楚患者在LVAD植入后是否需要ICD。此外,LVAD患者是否适合进行皮下ICD (S-ICD)仍不确定。材料和方法:上述问题是通过研究、案例报告和我们自己的经验来解决的。结果:对上述问题的研究得出了不同的结论。虽然一些研究表明ICD也可能对LVAD患者有益,但其他研究强调了潜在的风险和有限的益处。这强调了在这一特定患者群体中临床决策的复杂性。S - icd在LVAD植入后可能遭受严重的功能损害,这使得这种组合存在争议。结论:由于目前研究的不确定性,目前还不能对LVAD植入后ICD(包括常规ICD和S - ICD)的作用提出一般性建议。因此,它应该涉及个性化和跨学科的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with left ventricular assist devices : Current controversies].

Background: Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are used to treat patients with advanced heart failure. A significant fraction of these patients simultaneously fulfill the indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).

Objectives: It is currently unclear whether patients require an ICD after LVAD implantation. In addition, it remains uncertain whether patients with an LVAD are suitable candidates for a subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD).

Materials and methods: The aforementioned questions were addresses using studies, case reports, and our own experience.

Results: Studies have yielded varying findings on the above question. While some investigations suggest that an ICD may also be beneficial for LVAD patients, other studies highlight potential risks with limited benefit. This underscores the complexity of clinical decision-making in this specific patient cohort. S‑ICDs can suffer from significant functional impairments after LVAD implantation, making this combination controversial.

Conclusions: Due to the inconclusiveness of current studies, a general recommendation regarding the role of an ICD (both conventional and S‑ICD) after LVAD implantation cannot be established at this time. Therefore, it should involve individualized and interdisciplinary decision making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie
Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Mit wissenschaftlichen Original- und Übersichtsarbeiten, Berichten über moderne Operationstechniken und experimentelle Methoden ist die Zeitschrift Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie ein Diskussionsforum für Themen wie: - Zelluläre Elektrophysiologie - Theoretische Elektrophysiologie - Klinische Elektrophysiologie - Angewandte Herzschrittmachertherapie - Bradykarde und tachykarde Herzrhythmusstörungen - Plötzlicher Herztod und Risikostratifikation - Elektrokardiographie - Elektromedizinische Technologie - Experimentelle und klinische Pharmakologie - Herzchirurgie bei Herzrhythmusstörungen Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgruppen Herzschrittmacher und Arrhythmie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie - Herz und Kreislaufforschung e.V. (DGK) sowie Stellungnahmen und praktische Hinweise runden das breite Spektrum dieser Zeitschrift ab. Interessensgebiete: Kardiologie, Herzschrittmachertherapie, Herzschrittmachertechnologie, klinische Elektrophysiologie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信