Melissa Kilburn, Yvonne Hornby-Turner, Valda Wallace, Dympna Leonard, Sarah G Russell, Rachel Quigley, Edward Strivens, Rebecca Evans
{"title":"自我报告的身体活动和久坐行为评估在全球土著人口中得到验证:范围审查。","authors":"Melissa Kilburn, Yvonne Hornby-Turner, Valda Wallace, Dympna Leonard, Sarah G Russell, Rachel Quigley, Edward Strivens, Rebecca Evans","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daaf055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic disease prevention programs that target physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are often evaluated using self-report assessment tools. However, these tools may require additional validation to ensure relevance and efficacy for Indigenous peoples. The scope to which this occurs is yet to be systematically assessed within the literature. This review aimed to explore and define the range of self-report physical activity and sedentary behaviour assessment tools validated for Indigenous adults globally. Searches were conducted across seven electronic databases; resultant articles were screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two reviewers. Analysis of the 15 included articles suggests that self-report physical activity and sedentary behaviour assessment tools have achieved varying levels of validity amongst Indigenous populations globally. Most studies rated as low cultural appropriateness on a 14-item Indigenous research quality appraisal tool, however, there was a significant moderate upward trend over time (P = 0.0328). Digital physical activity or sedentary behaviour assessment tools have not yet been validated within Indigenous adult populations and constitute an apparent gap in the literature. Established validation methods for other populations were commonly found to be inappropriate for Indigenous population groups. There were no evident trends regarding validation study methodology identified, signifying a more bespoke approach within Indigenous population groups. Therefore, meaningful consultation and project co-design may help to prevent the potential methodological redundancy when developing and validating physical activity assessment methods within Indigenous populations globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-report physical activity and sedentary behaviour assessments validated for Indigenous populations globally: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Kilburn, Yvonne Hornby-Turner, Valda Wallace, Dympna Leonard, Sarah G Russell, Rachel Quigley, Edward Strivens, Rebecca Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapro/daaf055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chronic disease prevention programs that target physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are often evaluated using self-report assessment tools. However, these tools may require additional validation to ensure relevance and efficacy for Indigenous peoples. The scope to which this occurs is yet to be systematically assessed within the literature. This review aimed to explore and define the range of self-report physical activity and sedentary behaviour assessment tools validated for Indigenous adults globally. Searches were conducted across seven electronic databases; resultant articles were screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two reviewers. Analysis of the 15 included articles suggests that self-report physical activity and sedentary behaviour assessment tools have achieved varying levels of validity amongst Indigenous populations globally. Most studies rated as low cultural appropriateness on a 14-item Indigenous research quality appraisal tool, however, there was a significant moderate upward trend over time (P = 0.0328). Digital physical activity or sedentary behaviour assessment tools have not yet been validated within Indigenous adult populations and constitute an apparent gap in the literature. Established validation methods for other populations were commonly found to be inappropriate for Indigenous population groups. There were no evident trends regarding validation study methodology identified, signifying a more bespoke approach within Indigenous population groups. Therefore, meaningful consultation and project co-design may help to prevent the potential methodological redundancy when developing and validating physical activity assessment methods within Indigenous populations globally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion International\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096453/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf055\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Self-report physical activity and sedentary behaviour assessments validated for Indigenous populations globally: a scoping review.
Chronic disease prevention programs that target physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are often evaluated using self-report assessment tools. However, these tools may require additional validation to ensure relevance and efficacy for Indigenous peoples. The scope to which this occurs is yet to be systematically assessed within the literature. This review aimed to explore and define the range of self-report physical activity and sedentary behaviour assessment tools validated for Indigenous adults globally. Searches were conducted across seven electronic databases; resultant articles were screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two reviewers. Analysis of the 15 included articles suggests that self-report physical activity and sedentary behaviour assessment tools have achieved varying levels of validity amongst Indigenous populations globally. Most studies rated as low cultural appropriateness on a 14-item Indigenous research quality appraisal tool, however, there was a significant moderate upward trend over time (P = 0.0328). Digital physical activity or sedentary behaviour assessment tools have not yet been validated within Indigenous adult populations and constitute an apparent gap in the literature. Established validation methods for other populations were commonly found to be inappropriate for Indigenous population groups. There were no evident trends regarding validation study methodology identified, signifying a more bespoke approach within Indigenous population groups. Therefore, meaningful consultation and project co-design may help to prevent the potential methodological redundancy when developing and validating physical activity assessment methods within Indigenous populations globally.
期刊介绍:
Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.