不同跑鞋技术对休闲跑步者跑步时肌肉骨骼负荷和损伤结果的影响。

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Sportverletzung-Sportschaden Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1055/a-2563-4935
Gert-Peter Brüggemann, Tanja Esser, Sebastian Rehorst, Eva Hirschhäuser, Norbert Hensen
{"title":"不同跑鞋技术对休闲跑步者跑步时肌肉骨骼负荷和损伤结果的影响。","authors":"Gert-Peter Brüggemann, Tanja Esser, Sebastian Rehorst, Eva Hirschhäuser, Norbert Hensen","doi":"10.1055/a-2563-4935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This biomechanical study of 38 male and female recreational runners demonstrates the relationship between the four most frequently used footwear technologies and the biomechanical load on the lower extremities during running. Running with the four midsole technologies ((1) neutral, cushioning running shoes (N_LS), (2) supportive, motion control running shoes (S_LS), (3) maximalist, carbon-fibre plate running shoes (M_LS), and (4) running shoes with a U-shaped midsole construction and highly cushioning foam (U_LS)) indicates a strong impact of the midsole technology on the kinetics of the lower extremities. Midsole construction and material of the four running shoe categories systematically influence joint moments at the foot, ankle joint, and knee joint, thereby modulating the mechanical load on the biological structures of the lower extremities with each running step. The data demonstrate no significant differences in running kinetics between N_LS and S_LS, while M_LS increases and U_LS decreases ankle joint and knee joint load during the stance phase.A 12-month standardized and randomized intervention trial surveyed 1697 recreational runners who used one of the four dedicated running shoe categories in more than 75% of their runs. The results demonstrate a strong relation between the development of running-associated injuries in general, and knee and Achilles tendon problems in particular, and the footwear categories. While neutral and supportive running shoes show no significant differences in the development of running-related injuries, M_LS increases and U_LS decreases this risk, especially the occurrence of knee pain. Other risk factors, such as age, gender, BMI, running distance, average speed, surface as well as foot morphology and leg axis, only had a minor effect on the development of running-related injuries in the 12-month survey. Running shoe midsole technologies offer a sophisticated causal explanation for overload injuries of biological structures in the lower extremity during running and the resulting running-related injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":51169,"journal":{"name":"Sportverletzung-Sportschaden","volume":"39 2","pages":"77-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The Influence of Different Running Shoe Technologies on the Musculoskeletal Load in Running and Injury Outcomes in Recreational Runners].\",\"authors\":\"Gert-Peter Brüggemann, Tanja Esser, Sebastian Rehorst, Eva Hirschhäuser, Norbert Hensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2563-4935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This biomechanical study of 38 male and female recreational runners demonstrates the relationship between the four most frequently used footwear technologies and the biomechanical load on the lower extremities during running. Running with the four midsole technologies ((1) neutral, cushioning running shoes (N_LS), (2) supportive, motion control running shoes (S_LS), (3) maximalist, carbon-fibre plate running shoes (M_LS), and (4) running shoes with a U-shaped midsole construction and highly cushioning foam (U_LS)) indicates a strong impact of the midsole technology on the kinetics of the lower extremities. Midsole construction and material of the four running shoe categories systematically influence joint moments at the foot, ankle joint, and knee joint, thereby modulating the mechanical load on the biological structures of the lower extremities with each running step. The data demonstrate no significant differences in running kinetics between N_LS and S_LS, while M_LS increases and U_LS decreases ankle joint and knee joint load during the stance phase.A 12-month standardized and randomized intervention trial surveyed 1697 recreational runners who used one of the four dedicated running shoe categories in more than 75% of their runs. The results demonstrate a strong relation between the development of running-associated injuries in general, and knee and Achilles tendon problems in particular, and the footwear categories. While neutral and supportive running shoes show no significant differences in the development of running-related injuries, M_LS increases and U_LS decreases this risk, especially the occurrence of knee pain. Other risk factors, such as age, gender, BMI, running distance, average speed, surface as well as foot morphology and leg axis, only had a minor effect on the development of running-related injuries in the 12-month survey. Running shoe midsole technologies offer a sophisticated causal explanation for overload injuries of biological structures in the lower extremity during running and the resulting running-related injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sportverletzung-Sportschaden\",\"volume\":\"39 2\",\"pages\":\"77-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sportverletzung-Sportschaden\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2563-4935\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sportverletzung-Sportschaden","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2563-4935","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项对38名男性和女性休闲跑步者的生物力学研究证明了四种最常用的鞋类技术与跑步过程中下肢的生物力学负荷之间的关系。使用四种中底技术((1)中性缓冲跑鞋(N_LS),(2)支持性运动控制跑鞋(S_LS),(3)最大化碳纤维板跑鞋(M_LS)和(4)u型中底结构和高缓冲泡沫跑鞋(U_LS))跑步表明中底技术对下肢动力学的强烈影响。四种跑鞋的中底结构和材料系统地影响足部、踝关节和膝关节的关节力矩,从而调节每一步跑步时下肢生物结构的机械负荷。在站立阶段,N_LS和S_LS在跑步动力学上没有显著差异,而M_LS增加了踝关节和膝关节负荷,U_LS减少了踝关节和膝关节负荷。一项为期12个月的标准化和随机干预试验调查了1697名休闲跑步者,他们在75%以上的跑步中使用四种专用跑鞋中的一种。研究结果表明,一般情况下,与跑步相关的损伤,特别是膝盖和跟腱问题的发展与鞋类类别之间存在很强的关系。中性跑鞋和支持性跑鞋在发生与跑步相关的损伤方面没有显著差异,但M_LS增加了这种风险,U_LS减少了这种风险,尤其是膝盖疼痛的发生。在为期12个月的调查中,其他风险因素,如年龄、性别、体重指数、跑步距离、平均速度、表面以及足部形态和腿轴,对跑步相关损伤的发展只有很小的影响。跑鞋中底技术为跑步过程中下肢生物结构的过载损伤和由此产生的跑步相关损伤提供了复杂的因果解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The Influence of Different Running Shoe Technologies on the Musculoskeletal Load in Running and Injury Outcomes in Recreational Runners].

This biomechanical study of 38 male and female recreational runners demonstrates the relationship between the four most frequently used footwear technologies and the biomechanical load on the lower extremities during running. Running with the four midsole technologies ((1) neutral, cushioning running shoes (N_LS), (2) supportive, motion control running shoes (S_LS), (3) maximalist, carbon-fibre plate running shoes (M_LS), and (4) running shoes with a U-shaped midsole construction and highly cushioning foam (U_LS)) indicates a strong impact of the midsole technology on the kinetics of the lower extremities. Midsole construction and material of the four running shoe categories systematically influence joint moments at the foot, ankle joint, and knee joint, thereby modulating the mechanical load on the biological structures of the lower extremities with each running step. The data demonstrate no significant differences in running kinetics between N_LS and S_LS, while M_LS increases and U_LS decreases ankle joint and knee joint load during the stance phase.A 12-month standardized and randomized intervention trial surveyed 1697 recreational runners who used one of the four dedicated running shoe categories in more than 75% of their runs. The results demonstrate a strong relation between the development of running-associated injuries in general, and knee and Achilles tendon problems in particular, and the footwear categories. While neutral and supportive running shoes show no significant differences in the development of running-related injuries, M_LS increases and U_LS decreases this risk, especially the occurrence of knee pain. Other risk factors, such as age, gender, BMI, running distance, average speed, surface as well as foot morphology and leg axis, only had a minor effect on the development of running-related injuries in the 12-month survey. Running shoe midsole technologies offer a sophisticated causal explanation for overload injuries of biological structures in the lower extremity during running and the resulting running-related injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sportverletzung-Sportschaden
Sportverletzung-Sportschaden 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ihr Forum - Die Zeitschrift Sportverletzung-Sportschaden Infos von A bis Z: Grundlagen, Prävention und Rehabilitation Topaktuelle Themen: Abbildung der Verletzungen/Prävention bei Trendsportarten Vielfältiges Spektrum: Physiotherapie, Wissenschaft und angewandte Forschung, neue Produkte und Hilfsmittel Aktuelle Themen mit echtem Nutzwert Sporttraumatologie: Prävention, Therapie, Rehabilitation Sportphysiotherapie: Grundlagen, Biomechanik, Manuelle Therapie, Funktionelle Therapie, Trainingstherapie im Sport, Geräte, Trends
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信