Naveed Rabbani MD , Margaret Fry MD , Louis Vernacchio MD, MSc , Emily Trudell Correa MPH, MS , Susannah Kisvarday MD , Jonathan Hatoun MD, MPH, MS , Michael Day MD , Mark E. Alexander MD
{"title":"在儿科初级保健网络中实施心源性猝死风险筛查。","authors":"Naveed Rabbani MD , Margaret Fry MD , Louis Vernacchio MD, MSc , Emily Trudell Correa MPH, MS , Susannah Kisvarday MD , Jonathan Hatoun MD, MPH, MS , Michael Day MD , Mark E. Alexander MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.102850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>In 2021, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommended universal, history-based sudden cardiac death risk screening, representing an expansion from history- and exam-based screening for sports preparticipation. We studied the implementation of universal cardiac risk screening within a large pediatric primary care network to better understand optimal workflow design, screening positivity rate, and potential system-based effects that may arise from expanded screening.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We adapted the AAP guidelines to a 3-question screener implemented into the electronic health record as a patient portal questionnaire with a back-up paper-based workflow. A noninterruptive alert provided clinical decision support. Screening positivity rates and rates of follow-up actions were measured. Screening rates were compared across patient demographics using a multivariable model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between March 1, 2024, and February 28, 2025, of 72,037 eligible patients, 41,433 (58%) were screened. Of these, 3463 (8.4%) had a clinically actionable positive screen. Follow-up evaluation was ordered in 31% of cases. A multivariable model demonstrated that inactive patient portal status, teenage patient age, patient race of “Unknown,” and public insurance were associated with lower screening rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Implementing universal history-based sudden cardiac death risk screening in a pediatric primary care network exhibited an 8.4% positivity rate after clinician review, representing a large potential burden of cardiology referrals. Over half of eligible patients were screened, and follow-up evaluation was ordered in a minority of positive cases, signaling a gap in adoption/adherence. This implementation was associated with lower screening rates in certain disadvantaged populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":"25 6","pages":"Article 102850"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Screening Within a Pediatric Primary Care Network\",\"authors\":\"Naveed Rabbani MD , Margaret Fry MD , Louis Vernacchio MD, MSc , Emily Trudell Correa MPH, MS , Susannah Kisvarday MD , Jonathan Hatoun MD, MPH, MS , Michael Day MD , Mark E. Alexander MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acap.2025.102850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>In 2021, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommended universal, history-based sudden cardiac death risk screening, representing an expansion from history- and exam-based screening for sports preparticipation. We studied the implementation of universal cardiac risk screening within a large pediatric primary care network to better understand optimal workflow design, screening positivity rate, and potential system-based effects that may arise from expanded screening.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We adapted the AAP guidelines to a 3-question screener implemented into the electronic health record as a patient portal questionnaire with a back-up paper-based workflow. A noninterruptive alert provided clinical decision support. Screening positivity rates and rates of follow-up actions were measured. Screening rates were compared across patient demographics using a multivariable model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between March 1, 2024, and February 28, 2025, of 72,037 eligible patients, 41,433 (58%) were screened. Of these, 3463 (8.4%) had a clinically actionable positive screen. Follow-up evaluation was ordered in 31% of cases. A multivariable model demonstrated that inactive patient portal status, teenage patient age, patient race of “Unknown,” and public insurance were associated with lower screening rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Implementing universal history-based sudden cardiac death risk screening in a pediatric primary care network exhibited an 8.4% positivity rate after clinician review, representing a large potential burden of cardiology referrals. Over half of eligible patients were screened, and follow-up evaluation was ordered in a minority of positive cases, signaling a gap in adoption/adherence. This implementation was associated with lower screening rates in certain disadvantaged populations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 102850\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876285925000750\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876285925000750","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementing Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Screening Within a Pediatric Primary Care Network
Objective
In 2021, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommended universal, history-based sudden cardiac death risk screening, representing an expansion from history- and exam-based screening for sports preparticipation. We studied the implementation of universal cardiac risk screening within a large pediatric primary care network to better understand optimal workflow design, screening positivity rate, and potential system-based effects that may arise from expanded screening.
Methods
We adapted the AAP guidelines to a 3-question screener implemented into the electronic health record as a patient portal questionnaire with a back-up paper-based workflow. A noninterruptive alert provided clinical decision support. Screening positivity rates and rates of follow-up actions were measured. Screening rates were compared across patient demographics using a multivariable model.
Results
Between March 1, 2024, and February 28, 2025, of 72,037 eligible patients, 41,433 (58%) were screened. Of these, 3463 (8.4%) had a clinically actionable positive screen. Follow-up evaluation was ordered in 31% of cases. A multivariable model demonstrated that inactive patient portal status, teenage patient age, patient race of “Unknown,” and public insurance were associated with lower screening rates.
Conclusions
Implementing universal history-based sudden cardiac death risk screening in a pediatric primary care network exhibited an 8.4% positivity rate after clinician review, representing a large potential burden of cardiology referrals. Over half of eligible patients were screened, and follow-up evaluation was ordered in a minority of positive cases, signaling a gap in adoption/adherence. This implementation was associated with lower screening rates in certain disadvantaged populations.
期刊介绍:
Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.