Matthew S. Pantell MD, MS , David M. Mosen PhD, MPH , Nathan Tran BS , Laura M. Gottlieb MD, MPH , Matthew P. Banegas PhD, MPH, MS
{"title":"儿科患者个体社会风险、社会需求和社区社会风险的差异","authors":"Matthew S. Pantell MD, MS , David M. Mosen PhD, MPH , Nathan Tran BS , Laura M. Gottlieb MD, MPH , Matthew P. Banegas PhD, MPH, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.102851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We sought to explore relationships between community-level social determinants/drivers of health (SDOH), individual-level social risk factors, and individual-level social needs—whether families desire help addressing social risk factors—among children’s families in a large, diverse patient population in the Pacific Northwest.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children ages 0 to 18 who received care at Kaiser Permanente Northwest, an integrated health care system serving patients in Oregon and Southwest Washington, between December 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019. Social data came from the Your Current Life Situation survey as recorded in patient electronic medical records and included information on housing instability, food insecurity, transportation needs, and financial hardships. We used chi-square tests to compare rates of social risks, social needs, and Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI) quartiles.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample included 2313 children. Among the 59.6% of families endorsing at least 1 social risk, 66.9% desired assistance addressing at least 1 social need. Both individual-level social risks and social needs varied significantly by NDI quartile, with the highest social risk and social needs rates being in the highest NDI quartiles (most social disadvantage). However, among families in the lowest NDI quartile (most social advantage), 42.1% of families endorsed at least 1 risk and 23.3% of families endorsed at least 1 social need.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In a diverse sample of pediatric patients, we found that a community-level SDOH index inadequately identified families endorsing social risks and social needs. Our findings support policies that incentivize individual-level social risk and social need data collection in clinical settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":"25 7","pages":"Article 102851"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences Between Individual Social Risks, Social Needs, and Community-Level Social Risk Among Pediatric Patients\",\"authors\":\"Matthew S. Pantell MD, MS , David M. Mosen PhD, MPH , Nathan Tran BS , Laura M. Gottlieb MD, MPH , Matthew P. Banegas PhD, MPH, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acap.2025.102851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We sought to explore relationships between community-level social determinants/drivers of health (SDOH), individual-level social risk factors, and individual-level social needs—whether families desire help addressing social risk factors—among children’s families in a large, diverse patient population in the Pacific Northwest.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children ages 0 to 18 who received care at Kaiser Permanente Northwest, an integrated health care system serving patients in Oregon and Southwest Washington, between December 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019. Social data came from the Your Current Life Situation survey as recorded in patient electronic medical records and included information on housing instability, food insecurity, transportation needs, and financial hardships. We used chi-square tests to compare rates of social risks, social needs, and Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI) quartiles.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample included 2313 children. Among the 59.6% of families endorsing at least 1 social risk, 66.9% desired assistance addressing at least 1 social need. Both individual-level social risks and social needs varied significantly by NDI quartile, with the highest social risk and social needs rates being in the highest NDI quartiles (most social disadvantage). However, among families in the lowest NDI quartile (most social advantage), 42.1% of families endorsed at least 1 risk and 23.3% of families endorsed at least 1 social need.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In a diverse sample of pediatric patients, we found that a community-level SDOH index inadequately identified families endorsing social risks and social needs. Our findings support policies that incentivize individual-level social risk and social need data collection in clinical settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 7\",\"pages\":\"Article 102851\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876285925000762\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876285925000762","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differences Between Individual Social Risks, Social Needs, and Community-Level Social Risk Among Pediatric Patients
Objective
We sought to explore relationships between community-level social determinants/drivers of health (SDOH), individual-level social risk factors, and individual-level social needs—whether families desire help addressing social risk factors—among children’s families in a large, diverse patient population in the Pacific Northwest.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children ages 0 to 18 who received care at Kaiser Permanente Northwest, an integrated health care system serving patients in Oregon and Southwest Washington, between December 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019. Social data came from the Your Current Life Situation survey as recorded in patient electronic medical records and included information on housing instability, food insecurity, transportation needs, and financial hardships. We used chi-square tests to compare rates of social risks, social needs, and Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI) quartiles.
Results
The sample included 2313 children. Among the 59.6% of families endorsing at least 1 social risk, 66.9% desired assistance addressing at least 1 social need. Both individual-level social risks and social needs varied significantly by NDI quartile, with the highest social risk and social needs rates being in the highest NDI quartiles (most social disadvantage). However, among families in the lowest NDI quartile (most social advantage), 42.1% of families endorsed at least 1 risk and 23.3% of families endorsed at least 1 social need.
Conclusions
In a diverse sample of pediatric patients, we found that a community-level SDOH index inadequately identified families endorsing social risks and social needs. Our findings support policies that incentivize individual-level social risk and social need data collection in clinical settings.
期刊介绍:
Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.