急诊医疗机构见证的医师协助死亡一例报告

Q4 Nursing
Saahith Potluri, Tharun Potluri, Jose Victor Nable, Paul Peng, Kusum Punjabi
{"title":"急诊医疗机构见证的医师协助死亡一例报告","authors":"Saahith Potluri, Tharun Potluri, Jose Victor Nable, Paul Peng, Kusum Punjabi","doi":"10.5811/cpcem.38060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physician-assisted dying (PAD) is a practice that allows terminally ill patients to self-administer prescribed lethal medication. In the 11 states in the United States where PAD is legal, the incidence of PAD cases is rapidly rising. Despite most of these cases occurring in the out-of-hospital setting, states lack specific emergency medical services (EMS) protocols to guide prehospital responders who may encounter PAD in the field. We report a case in which a patient called 9-1-1 for a medical emergency and requested to ingest her prescribed lethal medication while in EMS care.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>Emergency medical services was dispatched for a 56-year-old female bleeding from her tracheostomy stoma. Despite the EMS responders' recommendation, the patient refused transport and instead requested to ingest her PAD medication. The crew, unfamiliar with PAD laws, were unsure whether they could legally honor the patient's refusal. Clinicians consulted with online medical control, who were also unaware of PAD. After extensive deliberation, the crew decided to honor the patient's refusal and thoroughly document the situation. The patient self-administered her medication as EMS cleared the scene.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case highlights logistical challenges and ethical dilemmas faced by EMS responders and underscores the complexity of balancing patient autonomy with legal and medical responsibilities in prehospital situations involving PAD. As PAD becomes increasingly prevalent, equipping EMS responders with clear protocols and providing ongoing education about prehospital PAD cases are vital for preserving patient rights while protecting the responders from legal and ethical uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":31975,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine","volume":"9 2","pages":"182-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12097240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician-Assisted Dying Witnessed by Emergency Medical Services: A Case Report.\",\"authors\":\"Saahith Potluri, Tharun Potluri, Jose Victor Nable, Paul Peng, Kusum Punjabi\",\"doi\":\"10.5811/cpcem.38060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physician-assisted dying (PAD) is a practice that allows terminally ill patients to self-administer prescribed lethal medication. In the 11 states in the United States where PAD is legal, the incidence of PAD cases is rapidly rising. Despite most of these cases occurring in the out-of-hospital setting, states lack specific emergency medical services (EMS) protocols to guide prehospital responders who may encounter PAD in the field. We report a case in which a patient called 9-1-1 for a medical emergency and requested to ingest her prescribed lethal medication while in EMS care.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>Emergency medical services was dispatched for a 56-year-old female bleeding from her tracheostomy stoma. Despite the EMS responders' recommendation, the patient refused transport and instead requested to ingest her PAD medication. The crew, unfamiliar with PAD laws, were unsure whether they could legally honor the patient's refusal. Clinicians consulted with online medical control, who were also unaware of PAD. After extensive deliberation, the crew decided to honor the patient's refusal and thoroughly document the situation. The patient self-administered her medication as EMS cleared the scene.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case highlights logistical challenges and ethical dilemmas faced by EMS responders and underscores the complexity of balancing patient autonomy with legal and medical responsibilities in prehospital situations involving PAD. As PAD becomes increasingly prevalent, equipping EMS responders with clear protocols and providing ongoing education about prehospital PAD cases are vital for preserving patient rights while protecting the responders from legal and ethical uncertainty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":31975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"182-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12097240/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5811/cpcem.38060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/cpcem.38060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:医生协助死亡(PAD)是一种允许绝症患者自行服用处方致命药物的做法。在PAD合法的美国11个州,PAD病例的发病率正在迅速上升。尽管这些病例大多发生在院外环境,但各州缺乏具体的紧急医疗服务(EMS)协议来指导可能在现场遇到PAD的院前急救人员。我们报告一个病例,其中一个病人拨打9-1-1医疗紧急情况,并要求摄取她的处方致命药物,而在EMS护理。病例介绍:一名56岁女性因气管造口出血而被紧急医疗服务。尽管急救人员的建议,患者拒绝转运,而是要求摄取她的PAD药物。工作人员不熟悉PAD法律,不确定他们是否可以合法地尊重病人的拒绝。临床医生咨询了在线医疗控制,他们也不知道PAD。经过深思熟虑后,医护人员决定尊重病人的拒绝,并彻底记录下当时的情况。急救人员清理现场时病人自行服药。结论:本病例突出了EMS急救人员面临的后勤挑战和伦理困境,并强调了在涉及PAD的院前情况下平衡患者自主权与法律和医疗责任的复杂性。随着PAD变得越来越普遍,为EMS响应者提供明确的协议,并提供关于院前PAD病例的持续教育,对于维护患者权利,同时保护响应者免受法律和道德不确定性的影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Physician-Assisted Dying Witnessed by Emergency Medical Services: A Case Report.

Physician-Assisted Dying Witnessed by Emergency Medical Services: A Case Report.

Introduction: Physician-assisted dying (PAD) is a practice that allows terminally ill patients to self-administer prescribed lethal medication. In the 11 states in the United States where PAD is legal, the incidence of PAD cases is rapidly rising. Despite most of these cases occurring in the out-of-hospital setting, states lack specific emergency medical services (EMS) protocols to guide prehospital responders who may encounter PAD in the field. We report a case in which a patient called 9-1-1 for a medical emergency and requested to ingest her prescribed lethal medication while in EMS care.

Case presentation: Emergency medical services was dispatched for a 56-year-old female bleeding from her tracheostomy stoma. Despite the EMS responders' recommendation, the patient refused transport and instead requested to ingest her PAD medication. The crew, unfamiliar with PAD laws, were unsure whether they could legally honor the patient's refusal. Clinicians consulted with online medical control, who were also unaware of PAD. After extensive deliberation, the crew decided to honor the patient's refusal and thoroughly document the situation. The patient self-administered her medication as EMS cleared the scene.

Conclusion: This case highlights logistical challenges and ethical dilemmas faced by EMS responders and underscores the complexity of balancing patient autonomy with legal and medical responsibilities in prehospital situations involving PAD. As PAD becomes increasingly prevalent, equipping EMS responders with clear protocols and providing ongoing education about prehospital PAD cases are vital for preserving patient rights while protecting the responders from legal and ethical uncertainty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信