原发性自发性气胸术后早期和晚期胸管拔除:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2025-04-30 Epub Date: 2025-04-25 DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-1802
Quirine C A van Steenwijk, Louisa N Spaans, Jerry Braun, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Frank J C van den Broek
{"title":"原发性自发性气胸术后早期和晚期胸管拔除:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Quirine C A van Steenwijk, Louisa N Spaans, Jerry Braun, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Frank J C van den Broek","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-1802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal timing of postoperative chest tube removal remains disputable. Traditionally, chest tubes are left in place for several days for adequate pleurodesis and recurrence prevention after surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). Currently, early tube removal, defined as immediate removal upon cessation of air leakage, is increasingly practiced. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of early chest tube removal in terms of recurrence in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched until January 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed patients undergoing pleurodesis through video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for PSP if chest tube management was clearly described to discriminate between early and late tube removal protocols, and recurrence rate with a postoperative follow-up period of at least six months was reported. The primary outcome was recurrence rate, with secondary outcomes including postoperative length of stay (LOS), prolonged air leakage (PAL) and chest tube duration. Subgroup analysis contained type of pleurodesis. The quality of evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six studies comprising 6,166 patients were included, lacking direct comparative studies on early versus late chest tube removal. Due to loss to follow-up, 6,063 patients were analysed regarding recurrence rate, resulting in 4.49% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.33-6.03%; I<sup>2</sup>=65.6%] after late removal and 7.61% (95% CI: 5.44-10.57%; I<sup>2</sup>=8.2%) after early removal (P=0.02). Among the secondary outcomes only chest tube duration was significantly different between early and late removal [2.50 (95% CI: 2.31-2.71) versus 3.42 (95% CI: 3.08-3.81) days, P<0.001]. Subgroup analysis revealed the most pronounced difference in recurrence following pleurectomy as type of pleurodesis (P=0.003). The quality of evidence was considered low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although no direct comparative studies were retrieved, the best available evidence suggests that early chest tube removal may be associated with a slightly higher recurrence rate after surgical pleurodesis for pneumothorax. High-quality evidence is needed before implementing early removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"17 4","pages":"2194-2205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early versus late chest tube removal after surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax-a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Quirine C A van Steenwijk, Louisa N Spaans, Jerry Braun, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Frank J C van den Broek\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jtd-24-1802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal timing of postoperative chest tube removal remains disputable. Traditionally, chest tubes are left in place for several days for adequate pleurodesis and recurrence prevention after surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). Currently, early tube removal, defined as immediate removal upon cessation of air leakage, is increasingly practiced. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of early chest tube removal in terms of recurrence in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched until January 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed patients undergoing pleurodesis through video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for PSP if chest tube management was clearly described to discriminate between early and late tube removal protocols, and recurrence rate with a postoperative follow-up period of at least six months was reported. The primary outcome was recurrence rate, with secondary outcomes including postoperative length of stay (LOS), prolonged air leakage (PAL) and chest tube duration. Subgroup analysis contained type of pleurodesis. The quality of evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six studies comprising 6,166 patients were included, lacking direct comparative studies on early versus late chest tube removal. Due to loss to follow-up, 6,063 patients were analysed regarding recurrence rate, resulting in 4.49% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.33-6.03%; I<sup>2</sup>=65.6%] after late removal and 7.61% (95% CI: 5.44-10.57%; I<sup>2</sup>=8.2%) after early removal (P=0.02). Among the secondary outcomes only chest tube duration was significantly different between early and late removal [2.50 (95% CI: 2.31-2.71) versus 3.42 (95% CI: 3.08-3.81) days, P<0.001]. Subgroup analysis revealed the most pronounced difference in recurrence following pleurectomy as type of pleurodesis (P=0.003). The quality of evidence was considered low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although no direct comparative studies were retrieved, the best available evidence suggests that early chest tube removal may be associated with a slightly higher recurrence rate after surgical pleurodesis for pneumothorax. High-quality evidence is needed before implementing early removal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"2194-2205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093158/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1802\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1802","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后胸管拔除的最佳时机仍有争议。传统上,为了在原发性自发性气胸(PSP)手术后进行充分的胸膜清扫和预防复发,胸管会保留数天。目前,越来越多的人采用早期拔管,即在停止空气泄漏后立即拔管。本研究旨在评估早期胸管拔除在这些患者复发方面的安全性。方法:检索MEDLINE (PubMed)、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库至2024年1月。纳入标准包括通过电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)进行胸膜切除术的PSP患者,如果明确描述了胸管处理方法,区分了早期和晚期的拔管方案,并且术后随访时间至少为6个月的复发率报告。主要预后指标是复发率,次要预后指标包括术后住院时间(LOS)、漏气时间(PAL)和胸管时间。亚组分析包含胸膜固定术类型。采用推荐分级法、发展评价法评价证据质量。结果:纳入36项研究,包括6166例患者,缺乏早期和晚期胸管拔除的直接比较研究。由于没有随访,对6063例患者的复发率进行了分析,结果为4.49%[95%可信区间(CI): 3.33-6.03%;I2=65.6%]和7.61% (95% CI: 5.44 ~ 10.57%;I2=8.2%)早期切除后(P=0.02)。在次要结局中,只有胸管切除时间在早期和晚期有显著差异[2.50 (95% CI: 2.31-2.71)天和3.42 (95% CI: 3.08-3.81)天]。结论:虽然没有直接的比较研究,但现有的最佳证据表明,早期胸管切除可能与气胸手术胸膜切除术后复发率略高有关。在实施早期切除之前需要高质量的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early versus late chest tube removal after surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The optimal timing of postoperative chest tube removal remains disputable. Traditionally, chest tubes are left in place for several days for adequate pleurodesis and recurrence prevention after surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). Currently, early tube removal, defined as immediate removal upon cessation of air leakage, is increasingly practiced. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of early chest tube removal in terms of recurrence in these patients.

Methods: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched until January 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed patients undergoing pleurodesis through video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for PSP if chest tube management was clearly described to discriminate between early and late tube removal protocols, and recurrence rate with a postoperative follow-up period of at least six months was reported. The primary outcome was recurrence rate, with secondary outcomes including postoperative length of stay (LOS), prolonged air leakage (PAL) and chest tube duration. Subgroup analysis contained type of pleurodesis. The quality of evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method.

Results: Thirty-six studies comprising 6,166 patients were included, lacking direct comparative studies on early versus late chest tube removal. Due to loss to follow-up, 6,063 patients were analysed regarding recurrence rate, resulting in 4.49% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.33-6.03%; I2=65.6%] after late removal and 7.61% (95% CI: 5.44-10.57%; I2=8.2%) after early removal (P=0.02). Among the secondary outcomes only chest tube duration was significantly different between early and late removal [2.50 (95% CI: 2.31-2.71) versus 3.42 (95% CI: 3.08-3.81) days, P<0.001]. Subgroup analysis revealed the most pronounced difference in recurrence following pleurectomy as type of pleurodesis (P=0.003). The quality of evidence was considered low.

Conclusions: Although no direct comparative studies were retrieved, the best available evidence suggests that early chest tube removal may be associated with a slightly higher recurrence rate after surgical pleurodesis for pneumothorax. High-quality evidence is needed before implementing early removal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信