欧洲中风组织(ESO)和欧洲神经外科学会协会(EANS)关于自发性脑出血引起的中风的指南。

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Thorsten Steiner, Jan C Purrucker, Diana Aguiar de Sousa, Trine Apostolaki-Hansson, Jürgen Beck, Hanne Christensen, Charlotte Cordonnier, Matthew B Downer, Helle Eilertsen, Rachael Gartly, Stefan T Gerner, Leonard Ho, Silje Holt Jahr, Catharina Jm Klijn, Nicolas Martinez-Majander, Kateriine Orav, Jesper Petersson, Andreas Raabe, Else Charlotte Sandset, Floris H Schreuder, David Seiffge, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman
{"title":"欧洲中风组织(ESO)和欧洲神经外科学会协会(EANS)关于自发性脑出血引起的中风的指南。","authors":"Thorsten Steiner, Jan C Purrucker, Diana Aguiar de Sousa, Trine Apostolaki-Hansson, Jürgen Beck, Hanne Christensen, Charlotte Cordonnier, Matthew B Downer, Helle Eilertsen, Rachael Gartly, Stefan T Gerner, Leonard Ho, Silje Holt Jahr, Catharina Jm Klijn, Nicolas Martinez-Majander, Kateriine Orav, Jesper Petersson, Andreas Raabe, Else Charlotte Sandset, Floris H Schreuder, David Seiffge, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman","doi":"10.1177/23969873251340815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) affects ~3.4 million people worldwide each year, causing ~2.8 million deaths. Many randomised controlled trials and high-quality observational studies have added to the evidence base for the management of people with ICH since the last European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for the management of spontaneous ICH were published in 2014, so we updated the ESO guideline. This guideline update was guided by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) standard operating procedures for guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, in collaboration with the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS). We identified 37 Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions and prioritised clinical outcomes. We conducted systematic literature searches, tailored to each PICO, seeking randomised controlled trials (RCT) - or observational studies when RCTs were not appropriate, or not available - that investigated interventions to improve clinical outcomes. A group of co-authors allocated to each PICO screened titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted data from included studies. A methodologist conducted study-level meta-analyses and created summaries of findings tables. The same group of co-authors graded the quality of evidence, and drafted recommendations that were reviewed, revised and approved by the entire group. When there was insufficient evidence to make a recommendation, each group of co-authors drafted an expert consensus statement, which was reviewed, revised and voted on by the entire group. The systematic literature search revealed 115,647 articles. We included 208 studies. We found <b>strong evidence for</b> treatment of people with ICH on organised stroke units, and secondary prevention of stroke with blood pressure lowering. We found <b>weak evidence for</b> scores for predicting macrovascular causes underlying ICH; acute blood pressure lowering; open surgery via craniotomy for supratentorial ICH; minimally invasive surgery for supratentorial ICH; decompressive surgery for deep supratentorial ICH; evacuation of cerebellar ICH > 15 mL; external ventricular drainage with intraventricular thrombolysis for intraventricular extension; minimally invasive surgical evacuation of intraventricular blood; intermittent pneumatic compression to prevent proximal deep vein thrombosis; antiplatelet therapy for a licensed indication for secondary prevention; and applying a care bundle. We found <b>strong evidence against</b> anti-inflammatory drug use outside of clinical trials. We found <b>weak evidence against</b> routine use of rFVIIa, platelet transfusions for antiplatelet-associated ICH, general policies that limit treatment within 24 h of ICH onset, temperature and glucose management as single measures (outside of care bundles), prophylactic anti-seizures medicines, and prophylactic use of temperature-lowering measures, prokinetic anti-emetics, and/or antibiotics. New evidence about the management of ICH has emerged since 2014, enabling this update of the ESO guideline to provide new recommendations and consensus statements. Although we made strong recommendations for and against a few interventions, we were only able to make weak recommendations for and against many others, or produce consensus statements where the evidence was insufficient to guide clinical decisions. Although progress has been made, many interventions still require definitive, high-quality evidence, underpinning the need for embedding clinical trials in routine clinical practice for ICH.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"23969873251340815"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12098356/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) guideline on stroke due to spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage.\",\"authors\":\"Thorsten Steiner, Jan C Purrucker, Diana Aguiar de Sousa, Trine Apostolaki-Hansson, Jürgen Beck, Hanne Christensen, Charlotte Cordonnier, Matthew B Downer, Helle Eilertsen, Rachael Gartly, Stefan T Gerner, Leonard Ho, Silje Holt Jahr, Catharina Jm Klijn, Nicolas Martinez-Majander, Kateriine Orav, Jesper Petersson, Andreas Raabe, Else Charlotte Sandset, Floris H Schreuder, David Seiffge, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23969873251340815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) affects ~3.4 million people worldwide each year, causing ~2.8 million deaths. Many randomised controlled trials and high-quality observational studies have added to the evidence base for the management of people with ICH since the last European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for the management of spontaneous ICH were published in 2014, so we updated the ESO guideline. This guideline update was guided by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) standard operating procedures for guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, in collaboration with the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS). We identified 37 Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions and prioritised clinical outcomes. We conducted systematic literature searches, tailored to each PICO, seeking randomised controlled trials (RCT) - or observational studies when RCTs were not appropriate, or not available - that investigated interventions to improve clinical outcomes. A group of co-authors allocated to each PICO screened titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted data from included studies. A methodologist conducted study-level meta-analyses and created summaries of findings tables. The same group of co-authors graded the quality of evidence, and drafted recommendations that were reviewed, revised and approved by the entire group. When there was insufficient evidence to make a recommendation, each group of co-authors drafted an expert consensus statement, which was reviewed, revised and voted on by the entire group. The systematic literature search revealed 115,647 articles. We included 208 studies. We found <b>strong evidence for</b> treatment of people with ICH on organised stroke units, and secondary prevention of stroke with blood pressure lowering. We found <b>weak evidence for</b> scores for predicting macrovascular causes underlying ICH; acute blood pressure lowering; open surgery via craniotomy for supratentorial ICH; minimally invasive surgery for supratentorial ICH; decompressive surgery for deep supratentorial ICH; evacuation of cerebellar ICH > 15 mL; external ventricular drainage with intraventricular thrombolysis for intraventricular extension; minimally invasive surgical evacuation of intraventricular blood; intermittent pneumatic compression to prevent proximal deep vein thrombosis; antiplatelet therapy for a licensed indication for secondary prevention; and applying a care bundle. We found <b>strong evidence against</b> anti-inflammatory drug use outside of clinical trials. We found <b>weak evidence against</b> routine use of rFVIIa, platelet transfusions for antiplatelet-associated ICH, general policies that limit treatment within 24 h of ICH onset, temperature and glucose management as single measures (outside of care bundles), prophylactic anti-seizures medicines, and prophylactic use of temperature-lowering measures, prokinetic anti-emetics, and/or antibiotics. New evidence about the management of ICH has emerged since 2014, enabling this update of the ESO guideline to provide new recommendations and consensus statements. Although we made strong recommendations for and against a few interventions, we were only able to make weak recommendations for and against many others, or produce consensus statements where the evidence was insufficient to guide clinical decisions. Although progress has been made, many interventions still require definitive, high-quality evidence, underpinning the need for embedding clinical trials in routine clinical practice for ICH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Stroke Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"23969873251340815\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12098356/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Stroke Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873251340815\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Stroke Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873251340815","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自发性(非创伤性)脑出血(ICH)每年影响全世界约340万人,造成约280万人死亡。自2014年欧洲卒中组织(ESO)自发性脑出血管理指南发布以来,许多随机对照试验和高质量观察性研究增加了脑出血患者管理的证据基础,因此我们更新了ESO指南。本次指南更新由欧洲卒中组织(ESO)指南标准操作程序和推荐、评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)框架指导,并与欧洲神经外科学会协会(EANS)合作。我们确定了37个人群、干预、比较物、结果(PICO)问题,并对临床结果进行了优先排序。我们进行了系统的文献检索,为每个PICO量身定制,寻找随机对照试验(RCT) -或当RCT不合适或无法获得时的观察性研究-调查干预措施以改善临床结果。分配给每个PICO的一组共同作者筛选标题、摘要和全文,并从纳入的研究中提取数据。一位方法学家进行了研究水平的荟萃分析,并创建了结果摘要表。同一组共同作者对证据的质量进行评分,并起草建议,由整个小组审查、修订和批准。当没有足够的证据提出建议时,每组共同作者起草一份专家共识声明,由整个小组进行审查、修改和投票。系统的文献检索结果为115647篇。我们纳入了208项研究。我们发现了强有力的证据,证明脑出血患者在有组织的卒中单位进行治疗,并通过降低血压进行卒中二级预防。我们发现评分预测颅内出血大血管病因的证据不足;急性降血压;幕上脑出血开颅手术;幕上脑出血的微创手术;幕上深部脑出血减压术;小脑脑出血> 15 mL;脑室外引流联合脑室溶栓治疗脑室扩张;微创手术脑室内血液抽吸;间歇气动压缩预防近端深静脉血栓形成;二级预防指征的抗血小板治疗;使用护理包。我们在临床试验之外发现了反对使用消炎药的有力证据。我们发现弱证据反对常规使用rFVIIa,血小板输注抗血小板相关性脑出血,限制脑出血发病24小时内治疗的一般政策,将体温和血糖管理作为单一措施(护理包外),预防性抗癫痫药物,预防性使用降温措施,促动力学止呕吐剂和/或抗生素。2014年以来出现了关于非ICH管理的新证据,使得ESO指南的更新能够提供新的建议和共识声明。尽管我们对一些干预措施提出了强烈的支持和反对建议,但我们只能对许多其他干预措施提出微弱的支持和反对建议,或者在证据不足以指导临床决策的情况下发表共识声明。尽管取得了进展,但许多干预措施仍然需要明确的、高质量的证据,因此需要将临床试验纳入脑出血的常规临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) guideline on stroke due to spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage.

Spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) affects ~3.4 million people worldwide each year, causing ~2.8 million deaths. Many randomised controlled trials and high-quality observational studies have added to the evidence base for the management of people with ICH since the last European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for the management of spontaneous ICH were published in 2014, so we updated the ESO guideline. This guideline update was guided by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) standard operating procedures for guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, in collaboration with the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS). We identified 37 Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions and prioritised clinical outcomes. We conducted systematic literature searches, tailored to each PICO, seeking randomised controlled trials (RCT) - or observational studies when RCTs were not appropriate, or not available - that investigated interventions to improve clinical outcomes. A group of co-authors allocated to each PICO screened titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted data from included studies. A methodologist conducted study-level meta-analyses and created summaries of findings tables. The same group of co-authors graded the quality of evidence, and drafted recommendations that were reviewed, revised and approved by the entire group. When there was insufficient evidence to make a recommendation, each group of co-authors drafted an expert consensus statement, which was reviewed, revised and voted on by the entire group. The systematic literature search revealed 115,647 articles. We included 208 studies. We found strong evidence for treatment of people with ICH on organised stroke units, and secondary prevention of stroke with blood pressure lowering. We found weak evidence for scores for predicting macrovascular causes underlying ICH; acute blood pressure lowering; open surgery via craniotomy for supratentorial ICH; minimally invasive surgery for supratentorial ICH; decompressive surgery for deep supratentorial ICH; evacuation of cerebellar ICH > 15 mL; external ventricular drainage with intraventricular thrombolysis for intraventricular extension; minimally invasive surgical evacuation of intraventricular blood; intermittent pneumatic compression to prevent proximal deep vein thrombosis; antiplatelet therapy for a licensed indication for secondary prevention; and applying a care bundle. We found strong evidence against anti-inflammatory drug use outside of clinical trials. We found weak evidence against routine use of rFVIIa, platelet transfusions for antiplatelet-associated ICH, general policies that limit treatment within 24 h of ICH onset, temperature and glucose management as single measures (outside of care bundles), prophylactic anti-seizures medicines, and prophylactic use of temperature-lowering measures, prokinetic anti-emetics, and/or antibiotics. New evidence about the management of ICH has emerged since 2014, enabling this update of the ESO guideline to provide new recommendations and consensus statements. Although we made strong recommendations for and against a few interventions, we were only able to make weak recommendations for and against many others, or produce consensus statements where the evidence was insufficient to guide clinical decisions. Although progress has been made, many interventions still require definitive, high-quality evidence, underpinning the need for embedding clinical trials in routine clinical practice for ICH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.60%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Launched in 2016 the European Stroke Journal (ESJ) is the official journal of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), a professional non-profit organization with over 1,400 individual members, and affiliations to numerous related national and international societies. ESJ covers clinical stroke research from all fields, including clinical trials, epidemiology, primary and secondary prevention, diagnosis, acute and post-acute management, guidelines, translation of experimental findings into clinical practice, rehabilitation, organisation of stroke care, and societal impact. It is open to authors from all relevant medical and health professions. Article types include review articles, original research, protocols, guidelines, editorials and letters to the Editor. Through ESJ, authors and researchers have gained a new platform for the rapid and professional publication of peer reviewed scientific material of the highest standards; publication in ESJ is highly competitive. The journal and its editorial team has developed excellent cooperation with sister organisations such as the World Stroke Organisation and the International Journal of Stroke, and the American Heart Organization/American Stroke Association and the journal Stroke. ESJ is fully peer-reviewed and is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Issues are published 4 times a year (March, June, September and December) and articles are published OnlineFirst prior to issue publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信