肺大细胞神经内分泌癌与小细胞肺癌手术切除的临床病理特征及预后比较。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2025-04-30 Epub Date: 2025-04-27 DOI:10.21037/jtd-2025-345
Yuke Mao, Hao Chang, Lu Wang, Jinlong Teng, Tianjun Li, Luca Ampollini, Yoshinobu Ichiki, Robert A Ramirez, Hong Liu, Baohui Han, Jing Wang, Yanan Wang
{"title":"肺大细胞神经内分泌癌与小细胞肺癌手术切除的临床病理特征及预后比较。","authors":"Yuke Mao, Hao Chang, Lu Wang, Jinlong Teng, Tianjun Li, Luca Ampollini, Yoshinobu Ichiki, Robert A Ramirez, Hong Liu, Baohui Han, Jing Wang, Yanan Wang","doi":"10.21037/jtd-2025-345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are classified as types of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC). The aim of this study was to determine the similarities and differences in clinical features and prognosis between LCNEC and SCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively compared the clinical features and prognosis of LCNEC and SCLC, along with well as their two subtypes, including pure LCNEC (P-LCNEC) and combined LCNEC (C-LCNEC) and SCLC combined with LCNEC and SCLC combined with non-LCNEC, respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 341 patients with LCNEC and 580 patients with SCLC who underwent surgical treatment. Significant differences in smoking history, primary site, tumor location, pathological (p) N stage, pTNM stage, and visceral pleural invasion (VPI) were observed between LCNEC and SCLC groups (all P values <0.05). The subgroups of LCNEC (P-LCNEC and C-LCNEC) and SCLC (SCLC/LCNEC and SCLC/non-LCNEC) displayed differences in smoking history, primary site, tumor location, pT stage, pN stage, pTNM stage, VPI, adjuvant chemotherapy, and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. LCNEC and its subtypes P-LCNEC and C-LCNEC were associated with superior DFS and OS than were SCLC and its subtypes SCLC/LCNEC and SCLC/non-LCNEC (DFS: P=0.008, P=0.001, P=0.049; OS: P=0.005, P=0.005, P=0.006). Compared to patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, those with stage I SCLC or LCNEC who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated a significantly improved DFS (P=0.005 and P=0.048) and OS (P=0.004 and P=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LCNEC and SCLC, as well as their subtypes, have distinct clinical features and survival outcomes. SCLC exhibited more malignant biological behavior and was associated with a worse prognosis compared to LCNEC. Postoperative chemotherapy is recommended for patients with stage I HGNEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"17 4","pages":"2394-2410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of clinicopathologic features and prognosis between surgically resected pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small-cell lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Yuke Mao, Hao Chang, Lu Wang, Jinlong Teng, Tianjun Li, Luca Ampollini, Yoshinobu Ichiki, Robert A Ramirez, Hong Liu, Baohui Han, Jing Wang, Yanan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jtd-2025-345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are classified as types of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC). The aim of this study was to determine the similarities and differences in clinical features and prognosis between LCNEC and SCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively compared the clinical features and prognosis of LCNEC and SCLC, along with well as their two subtypes, including pure LCNEC (P-LCNEC) and combined LCNEC (C-LCNEC) and SCLC combined with LCNEC and SCLC combined with non-LCNEC, respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 341 patients with LCNEC and 580 patients with SCLC who underwent surgical treatment. Significant differences in smoking history, primary site, tumor location, pathological (p) N stage, pTNM stage, and visceral pleural invasion (VPI) were observed between LCNEC and SCLC groups (all P values <0.05). The subgroups of LCNEC (P-LCNEC and C-LCNEC) and SCLC (SCLC/LCNEC and SCLC/non-LCNEC) displayed differences in smoking history, primary site, tumor location, pT stage, pN stage, pTNM stage, VPI, adjuvant chemotherapy, and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. LCNEC and its subtypes P-LCNEC and C-LCNEC were associated with superior DFS and OS than were SCLC and its subtypes SCLC/LCNEC and SCLC/non-LCNEC (DFS: P=0.008, P=0.001, P=0.049; OS: P=0.005, P=0.005, P=0.006). Compared to patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, those with stage I SCLC or LCNEC who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated a significantly improved DFS (P=0.005 and P=0.048) and OS (P=0.004 and P=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LCNEC and SCLC, as well as their subtypes, have distinct clinical features and survival outcomes. SCLC exhibited more malignant biological behavior and was associated with a worse prognosis compared to LCNEC. Postoperative chemotherapy is recommended for patients with stage I HGNEC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"2394-2410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090107/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-2025-345\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-2025-345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺大细胞神经内分泌癌(LCNEC)和小细胞肺癌(SCLC)被归类为高级别神经内分泌癌(HGNEC)。本研究的目的是确定LCNEC和SCLC在临床特征和预后方面的异同。方法:回顾性比较LCNEC和SCLC的临床特征和预后,以及它们的两种亚型,分别为纯LCNEC (P-LCNEC)、合并LCNEC (C-LCNEC)、SCLC合并LCNEC和SCLC合并非LCNEC。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:我们纳入了341例LCNEC患者和580例SCLC患者,他们接受了手术治疗。LCNEC组和SCLC组在吸烟史、原发部位、肿瘤位置、病理(p) N分期、pTNM分期、内脏胸膜浸润(VPI)等方面均存在显著差异(p值均为p值)。结论:LCNEC和SCLC及其亚型具有不同的临床特征和生存结局。与LCNEC相比,SCLC表现出更恶性的生物学行为,预后更差。I期HGNEC患者推荐术后化疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of clinicopathologic features and prognosis between surgically resected pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small-cell lung cancer.

Background: Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are classified as types of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC). The aim of this study was to determine the similarities and differences in clinical features and prognosis between LCNEC and SCLC.

Methods: We retrospectively compared the clinical features and prognosis of LCNEC and SCLC, along with well as their two subtypes, including pure LCNEC (P-LCNEC) and combined LCNEC (C-LCNEC) and SCLC combined with LCNEC and SCLC combined with non-LCNEC, respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: We included 341 patients with LCNEC and 580 patients with SCLC who underwent surgical treatment. Significant differences in smoking history, primary site, tumor location, pathological (p) N stage, pTNM stage, and visceral pleural invasion (VPI) were observed between LCNEC and SCLC groups (all P values <0.05). The subgroups of LCNEC (P-LCNEC and C-LCNEC) and SCLC (SCLC/LCNEC and SCLC/non-LCNEC) displayed differences in smoking history, primary site, tumor location, pT stage, pN stage, pTNM stage, VPI, adjuvant chemotherapy, and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. LCNEC and its subtypes P-LCNEC and C-LCNEC were associated with superior DFS and OS than were SCLC and its subtypes SCLC/LCNEC and SCLC/non-LCNEC (DFS: P=0.008, P=0.001, P=0.049; OS: P=0.005, P=0.005, P=0.006). Compared to patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, those with stage I SCLC or LCNEC who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated a significantly improved DFS (P=0.005 and P=0.048) and OS (P=0.004 and P=0.03).

Conclusions: LCNEC and SCLC, as well as their subtypes, have distinct clinical features and survival outcomes. SCLC exhibited more malignant biological behavior and was associated with a worse prognosis compared to LCNEC. Postoperative chemotherapy is recommended for patients with stage I HGNEC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信