术后外束与立体定向放射治疗对手术治疗脊柱转移瘤的辅助作用。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jordan O Gasho, Daniel de Reus, Robert-Jan Pierik, Jantijn Amelink, Joseph H Schwab, Daniel G Tobert
{"title":"术后外束与立体定向放射治疗对手术治疗脊柱转移瘤的辅助作用。","authors":"Jordan O Gasho, Daniel de Reus, Robert-Jan Pierik, Jantijn Amelink, Joseph H Schwab, Daniel G Tobert","doi":"10.1177/21925682251345753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective cohort.ObjectivesWith rising cancer rates and survival, effective palliative treatments are crucial. For decades, conventional external beam RT (cEBRT) has been the standard for palliation but is dose-limited. The efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy for spinal metastases with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in direct comparison to cEBRT remains understudied. We aim to compare clinical outcomes after treatment with cEBRT or SBRT for patients with spinal metastases.MethodsEligible patients included those who received palliative RT with cEBRT or SBRT between January 2017 and December 2022 at Massachusetts General Hospital. A matched cohort of 204 patients was created using propensity score matching. Reoperation, overall survival (OS), and postoperative complications were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for residual bias after propensity score matching.Results81 patients treated with cEBRT were matched with 123 patients treated with SBRT. Reoperation rate was 13.2%, with no significant difference between the cEBRT and SBRT groups (12.4% vs 13.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.76). Median OS was 15.9 months (IQR, 6.7-40.6 months). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant association between type of radiotherapy and either reoperation or OS (<i>P</i> = 0.40 and <i>P</i> = 0.56, respectively). When comparing reoperation by radiation modality, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference.ConclusionWe observed that SBRT does not reduce rates of reoperation or complications, nor does it improve overall survival. These findings suggest that conventional radiotherapy remains a viable postoperative treatment for spinal metastases, especially when SBRT is not available or feasible, or when cost is a significant concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251345753"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12098324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative External Beam Versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy as Adjuvant to Surgically Treated Spinal Metastases.\",\"authors\":\"Jordan O Gasho, Daniel de Reus, Robert-Jan Pierik, Jantijn Amelink, Joseph H Schwab, Daniel G Tobert\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682251345753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective cohort.ObjectivesWith rising cancer rates and survival, effective palliative treatments are crucial. For decades, conventional external beam RT (cEBRT) has been the standard for palliation but is dose-limited. The efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy for spinal metastases with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in direct comparison to cEBRT remains understudied. We aim to compare clinical outcomes after treatment with cEBRT or SBRT for patients with spinal metastases.MethodsEligible patients included those who received palliative RT with cEBRT or SBRT between January 2017 and December 2022 at Massachusetts General Hospital. A matched cohort of 204 patients was created using propensity score matching. Reoperation, overall survival (OS), and postoperative complications were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for residual bias after propensity score matching.Results81 patients treated with cEBRT were matched with 123 patients treated with SBRT. Reoperation rate was 13.2%, with no significant difference between the cEBRT and SBRT groups (12.4% vs 13.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.76). Median OS was 15.9 months (IQR, 6.7-40.6 months). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant association between type of radiotherapy and either reoperation or OS (<i>P</i> = 0.40 and <i>P</i> = 0.56, respectively). When comparing reoperation by radiation modality, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference.ConclusionWe observed that SBRT does not reduce rates of reoperation or complications, nor does it improve overall survival. These findings suggest that conventional radiotherapy remains a viable postoperative treatment for spinal metastases, especially when SBRT is not available or feasible, or when cost is a significant concern.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"21925682251345753\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12098324/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251345753\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251345753","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:回顾性队列。随着癌症发病率和生存率的上升,有效的姑息治疗至关重要。几十年来,常规外束放射治疗(cEBRT)一直是缓解的标准,但剂量有限。脊柱转移术后放射治疗与立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)直接比较的疗效仍有待研究。我们的目的是比较脊髓转移患者接受cEBRT或SBRT治疗后的临床结果。方法符合条件的患者包括2017年1月至2022年12月在马萨诸塞州总医院接受姑息性放疗联合cEBRT或SBRT的患者。采用倾向评分匹配法建立了204例患者的匹配队列。评估再手术、总生存期(OS)和术后并发症。采用多变量logistic回归对倾向评分匹配后的残差进行校正。结果81例接受cEBRT治疗的患者与123例接受SBRT治疗的患者匹配。再手术率为13.2%,两组间差异无统计学意义(12.4% vs 13.8%, P = 0.76)。中位OS为15.9个月(IQR, 6.7-40.6个月)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示放疗类型与再手术或OS无显著相关性(P = 0.40和P = 0.56)。再手术与放疗方式比较,多变量logistic回归分析无显著性差异。结论SBRT不能降低再手术率和并发症,也不能提高总生存率。这些发现表明,传统放疗仍然是脊髓转移术后可行的治疗方法,特别是当SBRT不可用或不可行的时候,或者当成本是一个重要的问题时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postoperative External Beam Versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy as Adjuvant to Surgically Treated Spinal Metastases.

Study DesignRetrospective cohort.ObjectivesWith rising cancer rates and survival, effective palliative treatments are crucial. For decades, conventional external beam RT (cEBRT) has been the standard for palliation but is dose-limited. The efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy for spinal metastases with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in direct comparison to cEBRT remains understudied. We aim to compare clinical outcomes after treatment with cEBRT or SBRT for patients with spinal metastases.MethodsEligible patients included those who received palliative RT with cEBRT or SBRT between January 2017 and December 2022 at Massachusetts General Hospital. A matched cohort of 204 patients was created using propensity score matching. Reoperation, overall survival (OS), and postoperative complications were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for residual bias after propensity score matching.Results81 patients treated with cEBRT were matched with 123 patients treated with SBRT. Reoperation rate was 13.2%, with no significant difference between the cEBRT and SBRT groups (12.4% vs 13.8%, P = 0.76). Median OS was 15.9 months (IQR, 6.7-40.6 months). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant association between type of radiotherapy and either reoperation or OS (P = 0.40 and P = 0.56, respectively). When comparing reoperation by radiation modality, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference.ConclusionWe observed that SBRT does not reduce rates of reoperation or complications, nor does it improve overall survival. These findings suggest that conventional radiotherapy remains a viable postoperative treatment for spinal metastases, especially when SBRT is not available or feasible, or when cost is a significant concern.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信