GLP-1受体激动剂对保持和降低射血分数的心力衰竭患者心脏重塑的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart Failure Reviews Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1007/s10741-025-10523-0
Hasan Fareed Siddiqui, Saad Ahmed Waqas, Ruqiat Masooma Batool, Hussain Salim, Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas, Syed Farhan Hasni, Amro Alsaid, Anna Sannino, Aasim M Afzal, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan
{"title":"GLP-1受体激动剂对保持和降低射血分数的心力衰竭患者心脏重塑的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Hasan Fareed Siddiqui, Saad Ahmed Waqas, Ruqiat Masooma Batool, Hussain Salim, Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas, Syed Farhan Hasni, Amro Alsaid, Anna Sannino, Aasim M Afzal, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan","doi":"10.1007/s10741-025-10523-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have shown promising effects on heart failure (HF) outcomes, particularly in phenotype-specific populations. However, their impact on cardiac structure and function in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were queried through December 2024 for primary and secondary analyses of randomized controlled trials comparing GLP-1RA with placebo in HF patients. Outcomes included changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), global longitudinal strain (GLS), left ventricular mass, left atrial volume (LAV), and NT-proBNP levels. Random-effects models were used to calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs) or hazard ratios (HRs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six trials (n = 1,195) were included, with three each evaluating HFpEF and HFrEF populations. In patients with HFpEF, GLP-1RA significantly reduced the LV mass (WMD: -8.6 g; 95% CI: -14.6, -2.6; p = 0.005) and LAV (WMD: -5.4 ml; 95% CI: -8.8, -2.0; p = 0.002) and lowered NT-proBNP concentration throughout (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.8, 0.9; p < 0.001). A decrease in LAV was observed in the HFrEF population (WMD: -5.4 ml [95% CI: -8.8, -2.0]; p = 0.002). However, no significant improvements were observed in LVEF, LVEDV, LVESV, or GLS. There were significant differences between HFpEF and HFrEF for LVEDV (p = 0.01) and LVESV (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GLP-1RA demonstrated phenotype-specific benefits, improving structural remodeling in HFpEF but showing limited effects in HFrEF. These findings highlight the importance of targeted therapeutic strategies based on HF phenotypes. Further research is warranted to elucidate underlying mechanisms and optimize patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":12950,"journal":{"name":"Heart Failure Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"991-1004"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cardiac remodeling in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hasan Fareed Siddiqui, Saad Ahmed Waqas, Ruqiat Masooma Batool, Hussain Salim, Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas, Syed Farhan Hasni, Amro Alsaid, Anna Sannino, Aasim M Afzal, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10741-025-10523-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have shown promising effects on heart failure (HF) outcomes, particularly in phenotype-specific populations. However, their impact on cardiac structure and function in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were queried through December 2024 for primary and secondary analyses of randomized controlled trials comparing GLP-1RA with placebo in HF patients. Outcomes included changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), global longitudinal strain (GLS), left ventricular mass, left atrial volume (LAV), and NT-proBNP levels. Random-effects models were used to calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs) or hazard ratios (HRs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six trials (n = 1,195) were included, with three each evaluating HFpEF and HFrEF populations. In patients with HFpEF, GLP-1RA significantly reduced the LV mass (WMD: -8.6 g; 95% CI: -14.6, -2.6; p = 0.005) and LAV (WMD: -5.4 ml; 95% CI: -8.8, -2.0; p = 0.002) and lowered NT-proBNP concentration throughout (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.8, 0.9; p < 0.001). A decrease in LAV was observed in the HFrEF population (WMD: -5.4 ml [95% CI: -8.8, -2.0]; p = 0.002). However, no significant improvements were observed in LVEF, LVEDV, LVESV, or GLS. There were significant differences between HFpEF and HFrEF for LVEDV (p = 0.01) and LVESV (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GLP-1RA demonstrated phenotype-specific benefits, improving structural remodeling in HFpEF but showing limited effects in HFrEF. These findings highlight the importance of targeted therapeutic strategies based on HF phenotypes. Further research is warranted to elucidate underlying mechanisms and optimize patient selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Failure Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"991-1004\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Failure Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-025-10523-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Failure Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-025-10523-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)已显示出对心力衰竭(HF)结局的良好影响,特别是在表型特异性人群中。然而,它们对保持射血分数(HFpEF)和降低射血分数(HFrEF)的心衰患者心脏结构和功能的影响尚不清楚。方法:截至2024年12月,Medline、Cochrane Library和Scopus检索了比较GLP-1RA与安慰剂在HF患者中的随机对照试验的主要和次要分析。结果包括左室射血分数(LVEF)、舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、收缩末期容积(LVESV)、整体纵向应变(GLS)、左室质量、左房容积(LAV)和NT-proBNP水平的变化。随机效应模型用于计算加权平均差(wmd)或风险比(hr)。结果:纳入6项试验(n = 1195),其中3项分别评估HFpEF和HFrEF人群。在HFpEF患者中,GLP-1RA显著降低左室质量(WMD: -8.6 g;95% ci: -14.6, -2.6;p = 0.005)和LAV (WMD: -5.4 ml;95% ci: -8.8, -2.0;p = 0.002), NT-proBNP浓度降低(HR: 0.85;95% ci: 0.8, 0.9;p结论:GLP-1RA表现出表型特异性益处,改善HFpEF的结构重塑,但对HFrEF的影响有限。这些发现强调了基于HF表型的靶向治疗策略的重要性。进一步的研究是必要的,以阐明潜在的机制和优化患者选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cardiac remodeling in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have shown promising effects on heart failure (HF) outcomes, particularly in phenotype-specific populations. However, their impact on cardiac structure and function in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains unclear.

Methods: Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were queried through December 2024 for primary and secondary analyses of randomized controlled trials comparing GLP-1RA with placebo in HF patients. Outcomes included changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), global longitudinal strain (GLS), left ventricular mass, left atrial volume (LAV), and NT-proBNP levels. Random-effects models were used to calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs) or hazard ratios (HRs).

Results: Six trials (n = 1,195) were included, with three each evaluating HFpEF and HFrEF populations. In patients with HFpEF, GLP-1RA significantly reduced the LV mass (WMD: -8.6 g; 95% CI: -14.6, -2.6; p = 0.005) and LAV (WMD: -5.4 ml; 95% CI: -8.8, -2.0; p = 0.002) and lowered NT-proBNP concentration throughout (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.8, 0.9; p < 0.001). A decrease in LAV was observed in the HFrEF population (WMD: -5.4 ml [95% CI: -8.8, -2.0]; p = 0.002). However, no significant improvements were observed in LVEF, LVEDV, LVESV, or GLS. There were significant differences between HFpEF and HFrEF for LVEDV (p = 0.01) and LVESV (p = 0.04).

Conclusions: GLP-1RA demonstrated phenotype-specific benefits, improving structural remodeling in HFpEF but showing limited effects in HFrEF. These findings highlight the importance of targeted therapeutic strategies based on HF phenotypes. Further research is warranted to elucidate underlying mechanisms and optimize patient selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Failure Reviews
Heart Failure Reviews 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart Failure Reviews is an international journal which develops links between basic scientists and clinical investigators, creating a unique, interdisciplinary dialogue focused on heart failure, its pathogenesis and treatment. The journal accordingly publishes papers in both basic and clinical research fields. Topics covered include clinical and surgical approaches to therapy, basic pharmacology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pathology, and electrophysiology. The reviews are comprehensive, expanding the reader''s knowledge base and awareness of current research and new findings in this rapidly growing field of cardiovascular medicine. All reviews are thoroughly peer-reviewed before publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信