{"title":"某三级医院儿科出院患者用药及处方不当评价","authors":"Meeradevi Maratha Muthu, Shamala Balan, Sofea Syahira Salim, Ellya Maisarah Mohamad Idris, Anis Suzanna Nor Azmi","doi":"10.1177/00185787251337624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Aims:</b> Drug utilization and appropriateness assessment among pediatrics is crucial and relies on relevant evidence generation. The study aimed to analyze drug utilization and prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP) and determine the risk factors for PIP among discharged pediatric patients in a tertiary care hospital. <b>Methods:</b> The cross-sectional study included discharged pediatric (aged < 18 years) prescriptions received between March and May 2023. Drug utilization was assessed using World Health Organization (WHO) Prescribing Indicators. Appropriateness was evaluated using the prescription intervention categories (implicit tool) and 67-item Key Potentially Inappropriate Drugs in Pediatrics List (KIDs List; explicit tool). Categorical and continuous data were analyzed descriptively. Risk factors of PIP were determined by logistic regression analysis. <b>Results:</b> Overall, 1952 prescriptions (mean age 4.61 ± 4.72 years) containing 3304 drugs and 149 drug types were analyzed. The average number of drugs per prescription was 1.69. The use of generic names and drugs from the Malaysian National Essential Medicines List were 2061 (62.38%) and 2985 (90.35%), respectively. The number of antibiotics and injectables per prescription were 1338 (68.55%) and 1(0.05%), respectively. The prevalence of PIP was 8.15% (n = 159). Sixty-one (3.13%) prescriptions were intervened for inappropriate regimen, mainly involving inappropriate dose (n = 47, 2.41%), and inappropriate frequency (n = 15, 0.77%). Ten drugs (14.93%) from KIDs List were prescribed in 80 prescriptions (4.09%), primarily involving tramadol (n = 40, 2.05%). Number of drugs prescribed (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.63, 95% CI (1.40, 1.89), <i>P</i> < .001), and ages 28 days to 23 months (aOR = 0.15, 95% CI (0.05, 0.49), <i>P</i> = .001), and 2 to 11 years (aOR = 0.22, 95% CI (0.07, 0.71), <i>P</i> = .011) were identified as PIP risk factors. <b>Conclusion:</b> The study found inconsistencies with WHO recommendations for essential drugs, antibiotics, and generic names. Although PIP prevalence was low, the number of drugs prescribed and age categories were key risk factors, emphasizing the need for structured drug reconciliation and a country-specific safe prescribing tool to minimize PIP in pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"00185787251337624"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug Utilization and Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions Assessment Among Discharged Pediatric Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Meeradevi Maratha Muthu, Shamala Balan, Sofea Syahira Salim, Ellya Maisarah Mohamad Idris, Anis Suzanna Nor Azmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00185787251337624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and Aims:</b> Drug utilization and appropriateness assessment among pediatrics is crucial and relies on relevant evidence generation. The study aimed to analyze drug utilization and prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP) and determine the risk factors for PIP among discharged pediatric patients in a tertiary care hospital. <b>Methods:</b> The cross-sectional study included discharged pediatric (aged < 18 years) prescriptions received between March and May 2023. Drug utilization was assessed using World Health Organization (WHO) Prescribing Indicators. Appropriateness was evaluated using the prescription intervention categories (implicit tool) and 67-item Key Potentially Inappropriate Drugs in Pediatrics List (KIDs List; explicit tool). Categorical and continuous data were analyzed descriptively. Risk factors of PIP were determined by logistic regression analysis. <b>Results:</b> Overall, 1952 prescriptions (mean age 4.61 ± 4.72 years) containing 3304 drugs and 149 drug types were analyzed. The average number of drugs per prescription was 1.69. The use of generic names and drugs from the Malaysian National Essential Medicines List were 2061 (62.38%) and 2985 (90.35%), respectively. The number of antibiotics and injectables per prescription were 1338 (68.55%) and 1(0.05%), respectively. The prevalence of PIP was 8.15% (n = 159). Sixty-one (3.13%) prescriptions were intervened for inappropriate regimen, mainly involving inappropriate dose (n = 47, 2.41%), and inappropriate frequency (n = 15, 0.77%). Ten drugs (14.93%) from KIDs List were prescribed in 80 prescriptions (4.09%), primarily involving tramadol (n = 40, 2.05%). Number of drugs prescribed (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.63, 95% CI (1.40, 1.89), <i>P</i> < .001), and ages 28 days to 23 months (aOR = 0.15, 95% CI (0.05, 0.49), <i>P</i> = .001), and 2 to 11 years (aOR = 0.22, 95% CI (0.07, 0.71), <i>P</i> = .011) were identified as PIP risk factors. <b>Conclusion:</b> The study found inconsistencies with WHO recommendations for essential drugs, antibiotics, and generic names. Although PIP prevalence was low, the number of drugs prescribed and age categories were key risk factors, emphasizing the need for structured drug reconciliation and a country-specific safe prescribing tool to minimize PIP in pediatric patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"00185787251337624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089120/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787251337624\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787251337624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:儿科药物使用和适宜性评估至关重要,并依赖于相关证据的产生。本研究旨在分析某三级医院儿科出院患者的药物使用和潜在不适当处方(PIP)的流行情况,并确定潜在不适当处方的危险因素。结果:共收集处方1952张,平均年龄(4.61±4.72岁),含药物3304种,药物种类149种。每张处方的平均药品数量为1.69种。使用马来西亚国家基本药物目录通用名和药物分别为2061例(62.38%)和2985例(90.35%)。单处方抗生素和注射剂分别为1338种(68.55%)和1种(0.05%)。PIP患病率为8.15% (n = 159)。干预处方61张(3.13%),主要涉及剂量不适宜(n = 47, 2.41%)和频次不适宜(n = 15, 0.77%)。80张处方(4.09%)中使用儿童用药清单中的10种药物(14.93%),主要涉及曲马多(n = 40, 2.05%)。处方药物数量(调整优势比(aOR) = 1.63, 95% CI (1.40, 1.89), P = 0.001)和2 ~ 11岁(aOR = 0.22, 95% CI (0.07, 0.71), P = 0.011)被确定为PIP危险因素。结论:研究发现与世卫组织关于基本药物、抗生素和通用名称的建议不一致。虽然PIP患病率很低,但处方药物的数量和年龄类别是关键的风险因素,强调需要结构化的药物协调和针对特定国家的安全处方工具,以尽量减少儿科患者的PIP。
Drug Utilization and Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions Assessment Among Discharged Pediatric Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital.
Background and Aims: Drug utilization and appropriateness assessment among pediatrics is crucial and relies on relevant evidence generation. The study aimed to analyze drug utilization and prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP) and determine the risk factors for PIP among discharged pediatric patients in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: The cross-sectional study included discharged pediatric (aged < 18 years) prescriptions received between March and May 2023. Drug utilization was assessed using World Health Organization (WHO) Prescribing Indicators. Appropriateness was evaluated using the prescription intervention categories (implicit tool) and 67-item Key Potentially Inappropriate Drugs in Pediatrics List (KIDs List; explicit tool). Categorical and continuous data were analyzed descriptively. Risk factors of PIP were determined by logistic regression analysis. Results: Overall, 1952 prescriptions (mean age 4.61 ± 4.72 years) containing 3304 drugs and 149 drug types were analyzed. The average number of drugs per prescription was 1.69. The use of generic names and drugs from the Malaysian National Essential Medicines List were 2061 (62.38%) and 2985 (90.35%), respectively. The number of antibiotics and injectables per prescription were 1338 (68.55%) and 1(0.05%), respectively. The prevalence of PIP was 8.15% (n = 159). Sixty-one (3.13%) prescriptions were intervened for inappropriate regimen, mainly involving inappropriate dose (n = 47, 2.41%), and inappropriate frequency (n = 15, 0.77%). Ten drugs (14.93%) from KIDs List were prescribed in 80 prescriptions (4.09%), primarily involving tramadol (n = 40, 2.05%). Number of drugs prescribed (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.63, 95% CI (1.40, 1.89), P < .001), and ages 28 days to 23 months (aOR = 0.15, 95% CI (0.05, 0.49), P = .001), and 2 to 11 years (aOR = 0.22, 95% CI (0.07, 0.71), P = .011) were identified as PIP risk factors. Conclusion: The study found inconsistencies with WHO recommendations for essential drugs, antibiotics, and generic names. Although PIP prevalence was low, the number of drugs prescribed and age categories were key risk factors, emphasizing the need for structured drug reconciliation and a country-specific safe prescribing tool to minimize PIP in pediatric patients.
期刊介绍:
Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.