创伤有一个回声:一项混合方法研究探索在英国高等教育环境中的性暴力幸存者的常规医疗保健障碍。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Laura Hooper, Jane Meyrick
{"title":"创伤有一个回声:一项混合方法研究探索在英国高等教育环境中的性暴力幸存者的常规医疗保健障碍。","authors":"Laura Hooper, Jane Meyrick","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore barriers to healthcare among survivors of sexual violence (SV) and the behavioural pathways behind avoidance, focusing on survivor-led solutions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A mixed methods study collated qualitative interviews/surveys to explore the lived experiences of survivors of SV. Data were analysed using both quantitative descriptors and qualitative thematic analysis to expand the mechanisms/solutions to reported rates.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Higher education setting in the UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty-two survivors of SV between the ages of 18 and 29 self-identified as female (36), male (4), genderfluid (1) and non-binary transmasculine (1), with 10 describing themselves as being from racially minoritised communities and 32 as White survivors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis found 86% of survivors completely or significantly avoided healthcare, particularly sexual and reproductive services. Three themes were identified: (1) wider societal blame/marginalisation of survivors hindered their ability to access care in what felt like 'a system of oppression'; (2) once past these barriers, direct experiences with professionals replicated trauma, exacerbating avoidance and health disparities through 'healthcare-induced re-traumatisation'; (3) survivors identified what they needed to re-engage in healthcare including trauma-informed professionals and compassionate services with 'survivor-centred care'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SV may deepen health inequalities as survivors avoid healthcare. Survivor-led reforms called for survivor-centred practices and encouraged systemic reflection on how healthcare systems may contribute to the broader marginalisation of survivors. Findings echo policy recommendations for co-produced services led by minoritised/marginalised patients and operationalise trauma-informed training for healthcare professionals. Additionally, access-focused psychological support could reduce the impact of sexual trauma on morbidity and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 5","pages":"e102181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12097059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trauma has an echo: a mixed methods study exploring barriers to routine healthcare for survivors of sexual violence in a UK higher education setting.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Hooper, Jane Meyrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore barriers to healthcare among survivors of sexual violence (SV) and the behavioural pathways behind avoidance, focusing on survivor-led solutions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A mixed methods study collated qualitative interviews/surveys to explore the lived experiences of survivors of SV. Data were analysed using both quantitative descriptors and qualitative thematic analysis to expand the mechanisms/solutions to reported rates.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Higher education setting in the UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty-two survivors of SV between the ages of 18 and 29 self-identified as female (36), male (4), genderfluid (1) and non-binary transmasculine (1), with 10 describing themselves as being from racially minoritised communities and 32 as White survivors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis found 86% of survivors completely or significantly avoided healthcare, particularly sexual and reproductive services. Three themes were identified: (1) wider societal blame/marginalisation of survivors hindered their ability to access care in what felt like 'a system of oppression'; (2) once past these barriers, direct experiences with professionals replicated trauma, exacerbating avoidance and health disparities through 'healthcare-induced re-traumatisation'; (3) survivors identified what they needed to re-engage in healthcare including trauma-informed professionals and compassionate services with 'survivor-centred care'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SV may deepen health inequalities as survivors avoid healthcare. Survivor-led reforms called for survivor-centred practices and encouraged systemic reflection on how healthcare systems may contribute to the broader marginalisation of survivors. Findings echo policy recommendations for co-produced services led by minoritised/marginalised patients and operationalise trauma-informed training for healthcare professionals. Additionally, access-focused psychological support could reduce the impact of sexual trauma on morbidity and mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"e102181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12097059/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102181\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨性暴力(SV)幸存者获得医疗保健的障碍和逃避背后的行为途径,重点是幸存者主导的解决方案。设计:一项混合方法的研究整理了定性访谈/调查,以探索性侵幸存者的生活经历。使用定量描述符和定性专题分析对数据进行了分析,以扩大报告比率的机制/解决办法。环境:英国高等教育环境。参与者:42名年龄在18至29岁之间的SV幸存者,自我认定为女性(36人),男性(4人),性别流动(1人)和非二元变性男性(1人),其中10人自称来自少数种族社区,32人自称为白人幸存者。结果:分析发现,86%的幸存者完全或明显避免了医疗保健,特别是性和生殖服务。确定了三个主题:(1)对幸存者的更广泛的社会指责/边缘化阻碍了他们获得护理的能力,感觉像是“压迫制度”;(2)一旦越过这些障碍,与专业人员的直接经历就会复制创伤,通过“医疗保健诱发的再创伤”加剧逃避和健康差异;(3)幸存者确定了他们需要什么来重新参与医疗保健,包括创伤知情的专业人员和富有同情心的服务,以“幸存者为中心的护理”。结论:SV可能加深健康不平等,因为幸存者逃避医疗保健。幸存者主导的改革呼吁采取以幸存者为中心的做法,并鼓励系统地思考卫生保健系统如何可能导致幸存者更广泛的边缘化。调查结果与由少数/边缘化患者领导的联合生产服务的政策建议相呼应,并对医疗保健专业人员进行创伤知情培训。此外,以获取为重点的心理支持可以减少性创伤对发病率和死亡率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trauma has an echo: a mixed methods study exploring barriers to routine healthcare for survivors of sexual violence in a UK higher education setting.

Objectives: To explore barriers to healthcare among survivors of sexual violence (SV) and the behavioural pathways behind avoidance, focusing on survivor-led solutions.

Design: A mixed methods study collated qualitative interviews/surveys to explore the lived experiences of survivors of SV. Data were analysed using both quantitative descriptors and qualitative thematic analysis to expand the mechanisms/solutions to reported rates.

Setting: Higher education setting in the UK.

Participants: Forty-two survivors of SV between the ages of 18 and 29 self-identified as female (36), male (4), genderfluid (1) and non-binary transmasculine (1), with 10 describing themselves as being from racially minoritised communities and 32 as White survivors.

Results: Analysis found 86% of survivors completely or significantly avoided healthcare, particularly sexual and reproductive services. Three themes were identified: (1) wider societal blame/marginalisation of survivors hindered their ability to access care in what felt like 'a system of oppression'; (2) once past these barriers, direct experiences with professionals replicated trauma, exacerbating avoidance and health disparities through 'healthcare-induced re-traumatisation'; (3) survivors identified what they needed to re-engage in healthcare including trauma-informed professionals and compassionate services with 'survivor-centred care'.

Conclusions: SV may deepen health inequalities as survivors avoid healthcare. Survivor-led reforms called for survivor-centred practices and encouraged systemic reflection on how healthcare systems may contribute to the broader marginalisation of survivors. Findings echo policy recommendations for co-produced services led by minoritised/marginalised patients and operationalise trauma-informed training for healthcare professionals. Additionally, access-focused psychological support could reduce the impact of sexual trauma on morbidity and mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信