口腔面裂与不良出生健康结局:一项人口横断面研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Adriana Mendonça da Silva, Valéria Souza Freitas, Alexandre Rezende Vieira
{"title":"口腔面裂与不良出生健康结局:一项人口横断面研究。","authors":"Adriana Mendonça da Silva, Valéria Souza Freitas, Alexandre Rezende Vieira","doi":"10.1055/a-2598-9487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to examine whether newborns with orofacial clefts are at increased prevalence of poor birth health outcomes.This is a population-based cross-sectional study, conducted with information from 25,879,282 live births registered in the U.S. Vital Statistics Natality Birth Data from 2017 to 2023. The prevalence ratios and logistic regression models between orofacial cleft status (all, isolated, or nonisolated) and each child's birth health variables (delivery method, maternal morbidity, 5-minute Apgar score, gestational age, birth weight, abnormal conditions, infant breastfed at discharge) were calculated, assuming a <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05 as statistically significant.The prevalence ratios showed that newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to being born by cesarean section (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.18, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-1.21), having lower birth weight (PR = 2.18, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 2.11-2.25), lower Apgar 5 score (PR = 4.08, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 4.08-4.50), prematurity (PR = 1.55, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 1.50-1.60), experiencing more abnormal conditions at birth (PR = 3.72, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 3.64-3.80), and having more difficulty to be breastfed (PR = 2.16, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 2.11-2.22) than newborns without clefts. These ratios were even higher among those with nonisolated orofacial clefts. Associations were statistic significant even after adjustments.This study provides evidence that newborns with orofacial clefts are at increased prevalence of poor birth health outcomes. · Orofacial clefts are associated to higher prevalence of birth outcomes.. · Newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to have low birth weight.. · Newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to preterm birth..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orofacial Cleft and Poor Birth Health Outcomes: A Populational Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Adriana Mendonça da Silva, Valéria Souza Freitas, Alexandre Rezende Vieira\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2598-9487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to examine whether newborns with orofacial clefts are at increased prevalence of poor birth health outcomes.This is a population-based cross-sectional study, conducted with information from 25,879,282 live births registered in the U.S. Vital Statistics Natality Birth Data from 2017 to 2023. The prevalence ratios and logistic regression models between orofacial cleft status (all, isolated, or nonisolated) and each child's birth health variables (delivery method, maternal morbidity, 5-minute Apgar score, gestational age, birth weight, abnormal conditions, infant breastfed at discharge) were calculated, assuming a <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05 as statistically significant.The prevalence ratios showed that newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to being born by cesarean section (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.18, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-1.21), having lower birth weight (PR = 2.18, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 2.11-2.25), lower Apgar 5 score (PR = 4.08, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 4.08-4.50), prematurity (PR = 1.55, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 1.50-1.60), experiencing more abnormal conditions at birth (PR = 3.72, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 3.64-3.80), and having more difficulty to be breastfed (PR = 2.16, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 2.11-2.22) than newborns without clefts. These ratios were even higher among those with nonisolated orofacial clefts. Associations were statistic significant even after adjustments.This study provides evidence that newborns with orofacial clefts are at increased prevalence of poor birth health outcomes. · Orofacial clefts are associated to higher prevalence of birth outcomes.. · Newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to have low birth weight.. · Newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to preterm birth..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2598-9487\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2598-9487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是检查是否患有口面部唇裂的新生儿在不良出生健康结果的患病率增加。这是一项基于人群的横断面研究,使用了2017年至2023年美国生命统计出生数据中登记的25,879,282例活产婴儿的信息。计算唇腭裂状态(全部、孤立或非孤立)与每个孩子出生健康变量(分娩方式、产妇发病率、5分钟Apgar评分、胎龄、出生体重、异常情况、出院时母乳喂养)之间的患病率比和logistic回归模型,假设p≤0.05具有统计学意义。流行比率显示,新生儿与orofacial结晶更容易通过剖腹产出生(比率(公关)= 1.18,p = 0.000, 95%可信区间[CI] = 1.16 - -1.21),在低出生体重(公关= 2.18,p = 0.000, 95% CI -2.25 = 2.11),较低的阿普加5分(公关= 4.08,p = 0.000, 95% CI -4.50 = 4.08),早产(公关= 1.55,p = 0.000, 95% CI -1.60 = 1.50),出生时经历更多异常条件(公关= 3.72,p = 0.000, 95% CI -3.80 = 3.64),与没有唇裂的新生儿相比,更难以母乳喂养(PR = 2.16, p = 0.000, 95% CI = 2.11-2.22)。这一比例在非孤立性口面部裂患者中甚至更高。即使在调整后,相关性也具有统计学意义。本研究提供的证据表明,患有口面部裂的新生儿出生健康状况不佳的患病率增加。·口面部裂与较高的出生结果患病率有关。·唇腭裂新生儿更容易出现低出生体重。·唇腭裂新生儿更容易早产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Orofacial Cleft and Poor Birth Health Outcomes: A Populational Cross-Sectional Study.

This study aimed to examine whether newborns with orofacial clefts are at increased prevalence of poor birth health outcomes.This is a population-based cross-sectional study, conducted with information from 25,879,282 live births registered in the U.S. Vital Statistics Natality Birth Data from 2017 to 2023. The prevalence ratios and logistic regression models between orofacial cleft status (all, isolated, or nonisolated) and each child's birth health variables (delivery method, maternal morbidity, 5-minute Apgar score, gestational age, birth weight, abnormal conditions, infant breastfed at discharge) were calculated, assuming a p ≤ 0.05 as statistically significant.The prevalence ratios showed that newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to being born by cesarean section (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.18, p = 0.000, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-1.21), having lower birth weight (PR = 2.18, p = 0.000, 95% CI = 2.11-2.25), lower Apgar 5 score (PR = 4.08, p = 0.000, 95% CI = 4.08-4.50), prematurity (PR = 1.55, p = 0.000, 95% CI = 1.50-1.60), experiencing more abnormal conditions at birth (PR = 3.72, p = 0.000, 95% CI = 3.64-3.80), and having more difficulty to be breastfed (PR = 2.16, p = 0.000, 95% CI = 2.11-2.22) than newborns without clefts. These ratios were even higher among those with nonisolated orofacial clefts. Associations were statistic significant even after adjustments.This study provides evidence that newborns with orofacial clefts are at increased prevalence of poor birth health outcomes. · Orofacial clefts are associated to higher prevalence of birth outcomes.. · Newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to have low birth weight.. · Newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to preterm birth..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信