Adriana Mendonça da Silva, Valéria Souza Freitas, Alexandre Rezende Vieira
{"title":"口腔面裂与不良出生健康结局:一项人口横断面研究。","authors":"Adriana Mendonça da Silva, Valéria Souza Freitas, Alexandre Rezende Vieira","doi":"10.1055/a-2598-9487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to examine whether newborns with orofacial clefts are at increased prevalence of poor birth health outcomes.This is a population-based cross-sectional study, conducted with information from 25,879,282 live births registered in the U.S. Vital Statistics Natality Birth Data from 2017 to 2023. The prevalence ratios and logistic regression models between orofacial cleft status (all, isolated, or nonisolated) and each child's birth health variables (delivery method, maternal morbidity, 5-minute Apgar score, gestational age, birth weight, abnormal conditions, infant breastfed at discharge) were calculated, assuming a <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05 as statistically significant.The prevalence ratios showed that newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to being born by cesarean section (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.18, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-1.21), having lower birth weight (PR = 2.18, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 2.11-2.25), lower Apgar 5 score (PR = 4.08, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 4.08-4.50), prematurity (PR = 1.55, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 1.50-1.60), experiencing more abnormal conditions at birth (PR = 3.72, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 3.64-3.80), and having more difficulty to be breastfed (PR = 2.16, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 2.11-2.22) than newborns without clefts. These ratios were even higher among those with nonisolated orofacial clefts. Associations were statistic significant even after adjustments.This study provides evidence that newborns with orofacial clefts are at increased prevalence of poor birth health outcomes. · Orofacial clefts are associated to higher prevalence of birth outcomes.. · Newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to have low birth weight.. · Newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to preterm birth..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orofacial Cleft and Poor Birth Health Outcomes: A Populational Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Adriana Mendonça da Silva, Valéria Souza Freitas, Alexandre Rezende Vieira\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2598-9487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to examine whether newborns with orofacial clefts are at increased prevalence of poor birth health outcomes.This is a population-based cross-sectional study, conducted with information from 25,879,282 live births registered in the U.S. Vital Statistics Natality Birth Data from 2017 to 2023. The prevalence ratios and logistic regression models between orofacial cleft status (all, isolated, or nonisolated) and each child's birth health variables (delivery method, maternal morbidity, 5-minute Apgar score, gestational age, birth weight, abnormal conditions, infant breastfed at discharge) were calculated, assuming a <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05 as statistically significant.The prevalence ratios showed that newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to being born by cesarean section (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.18, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-1.21), having lower birth weight (PR = 2.18, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 2.11-2.25), lower Apgar 5 score (PR = 4.08, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 4.08-4.50), prematurity (PR = 1.55, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 1.50-1.60), experiencing more abnormal conditions at birth (PR = 3.72, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 3.64-3.80), and having more difficulty to be breastfed (PR = 2.16, <i>p</i> = 0.000, 95% CI = 2.11-2.22) than newborns without clefts. These ratios were even higher among those with nonisolated orofacial clefts. Associations were statistic significant even after adjustments.This study provides evidence that newborns with orofacial clefts are at increased prevalence of poor birth health outcomes. · Orofacial clefts are associated to higher prevalence of birth outcomes.. · Newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to have low birth weight.. · Newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to preterm birth..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2598-9487\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2598-9487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是检查是否患有口面部唇裂的新生儿在不良出生健康结果的患病率增加。这是一项基于人群的横断面研究,使用了2017年至2023年美国生命统计出生数据中登记的25,879,282例活产婴儿的信息。计算唇腭裂状态(全部、孤立或非孤立)与每个孩子出生健康变量(分娩方式、产妇发病率、5分钟Apgar评分、胎龄、出生体重、异常情况、出院时母乳喂养)之间的患病率比和logistic回归模型,假设p≤0.05具有统计学意义。流行比率显示,新生儿与orofacial结晶更容易通过剖腹产出生(比率(公关)= 1.18,p = 0.000, 95%可信区间[CI] = 1.16 - -1.21),在低出生体重(公关= 2.18,p = 0.000, 95% CI -2.25 = 2.11),较低的阿普加5分(公关= 4.08,p = 0.000, 95% CI -4.50 = 4.08),早产(公关= 1.55,p = 0.000, 95% CI -1.60 = 1.50),出生时经历更多异常条件(公关= 3.72,p = 0.000, 95% CI -3.80 = 3.64),与没有唇裂的新生儿相比,更难以母乳喂养(PR = 2.16, p = 0.000, 95% CI = 2.11-2.22)。这一比例在非孤立性口面部裂患者中甚至更高。即使在调整后,相关性也具有统计学意义。本研究提供的证据表明,患有口面部裂的新生儿出生健康状况不佳的患病率增加。·口面部裂与较高的出生结果患病率有关。·唇腭裂新生儿更容易出现低出生体重。·唇腭裂新生儿更容易早产。
Orofacial Cleft and Poor Birth Health Outcomes: A Populational Cross-Sectional Study.
This study aimed to examine whether newborns with orofacial clefts are at increased prevalence of poor birth health outcomes.This is a population-based cross-sectional study, conducted with information from 25,879,282 live births registered in the U.S. Vital Statistics Natality Birth Data from 2017 to 2023. The prevalence ratios and logistic regression models between orofacial cleft status (all, isolated, or nonisolated) and each child's birth health variables (delivery method, maternal morbidity, 5-minute Apgar score, gestational age, birth weight, abnormal conditions, infant breastfed at discharge) were calculated, assuming a p ≤ 0.05 as statistically significant.The prevalence ratios showed that newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to being born by cesarean section (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.18, p = 0.000, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-1.21), having lower birth weight (PR = 2.18, p = 0.000, 95% CI = 2.11-2.25), lower Apgar 5 score (PR = 4.08, p = 0.000, 95% CI = 4.08-4.50), prematurity (PR = 1.55, p = 0.000, 95% CI = 1.50-1.60), experiencing more abnormal conditions at birth (PR = 3.72, p = 0.000, 95% CI = 3.64-3.80), and having more difficulty to be breastfed (PR = 2.16, p = 0.000, 95% CI = 2.11-2.22) than newborns without clefts. These ratios were even higher among those with nonisolated orofacial clefts. Associations were statistic significant even after adjustments.This study provides evidence that newborns with orofacial clefts are at increased prevalence of poor birth health outcomes. · Orofacial clefts are associated to higher prevalence of birth outcomes.. · Newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to have low birth weight.. · Newborns with orofacial clefts were more susceptible to preterm birth..
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.