Lion Sieg, Hendrik Eismann, Bertrand Schneider, Jan Karsten, Dogus Darici
{"title":"分心如何破坏工作学习中的注意力同步:一项使用双移动眼动追踪的随机对照研究","authors":"Lion Sieg, Hendrik Eismann, Bertrand Schneider, Jan Karsten, Dogus Darici","doi":"10.1111/jcal.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Research in social cognition suggests that learning effectiveness in teacher-learner pairs may be influenced by how well their attention aligns with each other. However, we currently have limited understanding of how common distractions in real-world environments affect teacher-student interactions, specifically the synchronisation of their visual attention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This randomised controlled study investigates the impact of distractions on attentional synchronisation, learning performance, and cognitive load during training. A total of 29 medical students were randomly assigned to either a distraction group or a control group during a Transesophageal Echocardiography training in a simulation OR setting. Distractions were systematically induced in the experimental group, while attentional synchronisation was measured using a novel dual mobile eye-tracking technology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The distraction group demonstrated lower attentional synchronisation, compared to the control group (Mean = 41.59% ± 6.89% [SD] vs. 50.96% ± 10.59%; Bonferroni-corrected <i>t</i>(27) = −2.84, <i>p</i> = 0.008, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.06). This reduction in attentional synchronisation was accompanied by significantly poorer practical and visual performances (<i>d</i> = 0.87 and 0.62), longer task completion times (<i>d</i> = 2.05), and higher intrinsic and extraneous cognitive loads (<i>d</i> = 1.09 and 1.04).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings underscore the crucial role of attentional synchronisation in optimising work-based learning for complex clinical skills. Distractions in the learning environment disrupt the alignment of attention between teacher and learner, which impairs learning outcomes with substantial effect sizes. We outline several practical options to re-establish attentional synchronisation in distraction-rich learning environments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcal.70059","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Distractions Undermine Attentional Synchronisation in Work-Based Learning: A Randomised Controlled Study Using Dual Mobile Eye-Tracking\",\"authors\":\"Lion Sieg, Hendrik Eismann, Bertrand Schneider, Jan Karsten, Dogus Darici\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcal.70059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Research in social cognition suggests that learning effectiveness in teacher-learner pairs may be influenced by how well their attention aligns with each other. However, we currently have limited understanding of how common distractions in real-world environments affect teacher-student interactions, specifically the synchronisation of their visual attention.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This randomised controlled study investigates the impact of distractions on attentional synchronisation, learning performance, and cognitive load during training. A total of 29 medical students were randomly assigned to either a distraction group or a control group during a Transesophageal Echocardiography training in a simulation OR setting. Distractions were systematically induced in the experimental group, while attentional synchronisation was measured using a novel dual mobile eye-tracking technology.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The distraction group demonstrated lower attentional synchronisation, compared to the control group (Mean = 41.59% ± 6.89% [SD] vs. 50.96% ± 10.59%; Bonferroni-corrected <i>t</i>(27) = −2.84, <i>p</i> = 0.008, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.06). This reduction in attentional synchronisation was accompanied by significantly poorer practical and visual performances (<i>d</i> = 0.87 and 0.62), longer task completion times (<i>d</i> = 2.05), and higher intrinsic and extraneous cognitive loads (<i>d</i> = 1.09 and 1.04).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>These findings underscore the crucial role of attentional synchronisation in optimising work-based learning for complex clinical skills. Distractions in the learning environment disrupt the alignment of attention between teacher and learner, which impairs learning outcomes with substantial effect sizes. We outline several practical options to re-establish attentional synchronisation in distraction-rich learning environments.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcal.70059\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70059\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
How Distractions Undermine Attentional Synchronisation in Work-Based Learning: A Randomised Controlled Study Using Dual Mobile Eye-Tracking
Background
Research in social cognition suggests that learning effectiveness in teacher-learner pairs may be influenced by how well their attention aligns with each other. However, we currently have limited understanding of how common distractions in real-world environments affect teacher-student interactions, specifically the synchronisation of their visual attention.
Methods
This randomised controlled study investigates the impact of distractions on attentional synchronisation, learning performance, and cognitive load during training. A total of 29 medical students were randomly assigned to either a distraction group or a control group during a Transesophageal Echocardiography training in a simulation OR setting. Distractions were systematically induced in the experimental group, while attentional synchronisation was measured using a novel dual mobile eye-tracking technology.
Results
The distraction group demonstrated lower attentional synchronisation, compared to the control group (Mean = 41.59% ± 6.89% [SD] vs. 50.96% ± 10.59%; Bonferroni-corrected t(27) = −2.84, p = 0.008, Cohen's d = 1.06). This reduction in attentional synchronisation was accompanied by significantly poorer practical and visual performances (d = 0.87 and 0.62), longer task completion times (d = 2.05), and higher intrinsic and extraneous cognitive loads (d = 1.09 and 1.04).
Conclusions
These findings underscore the crucial role of attentional synchronisation in optimising work-based learning for complex clinical skills. Distractions in the learning environment disrupt the alignment of attention between teacher and learner, which impairs learning outcomes with substantial effect sizes. We outline several practical options to re-establish attentional synchronisation in distraction-rich learning environments.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope