土壤除草剂残留量与甜菜林分和生长减少的关系

IF 1.5 Q3 AGRONOMY
Adam R. Kennedy, Sushmita K. Sharma, Clarke G. Alder, Albert T. Adjesiwor
{"title":"土壤除草剂残留量与甜菜林分和生长减少的关系","authors":"Adam R. Kennedy,&nbsp;Sushmita K. Sharma,&nbsp;Clarke G. Alder,&nbsp;Albert T. Adjesiwor","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>One common recommendation given to farmers who suspect herbicide carryover to sugar beet (<i>Beta vulgaris</i> L.) is to conduct laboratory tests to assess herbicide residue levels in the soil. While this is often a good practice, there are currently no guidelines on how these laboratory test results relate to sugar beet damage or yield loss. Greenhouse studies were conducted in 2022 and 2023 to assess the relationship between soil residue levels of six herbicides (flumioxazin, imazamox, mesotrione, metribuzin, rimsulfuron, and terbacil) and sugar beet stand and growth reduction. At levels below the limit of detection in the laboratory, rimsulfuron reduced sugar beet stand density by more than 50% and biomass by 25%. Sugar beet stand density and biomass were reduced by about 40% and 25%, respectively, at metribuzin residue levels below the limit of detection. Similarly, flumioxazin reduced stand density and biomass by 50% at residue levels below the limit of detection. Stand density and biomass reduction due to mesotrione exceeded 50% even at residue levels below the limit of detection. Imazamox and terbacil caused minimal sugar beet stand and biomass reduction at residue levels below the limit of detection. These results demonstrate that laboratory analysis of herbicide residue levels in the soil must be accompanied by a bioassay to determine the potential crop damage from herbicide carryover.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70131","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relating soil herbicide residue levels to sugar beet stand and growth reduction\",\"authors\":\"Adam R. Kennedy,&nbsp;Sushmita K. Sharma,&nbsp;Clarke G. Alder,&nbsp;Albert T. Adjesiwor\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agg2.70131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>One common recommendation given to farmers who suspect herbicide carryover to sugar beet (<i>Beta vulgaris</i> L.) is to conduct laboratory tests to assess herbicide residue levels in the soil. While this is often a good practice, there are currently no guidelines on how these laboratory test results relate to sugar beet damage or yield loss. Greenhouse studies were conducted in 2022 and 2023 to assess the relationship between soil residue levels of six herbicides (flumioxazin, imazamox, mesotrione, metribuzin, rimsulfuron, and terbacil) and sugar beet stand and growth reduction. At levels below the limit of detection in the laboratory, rimsulfuron reduced sugar beet stand density by more than 50% and biomass by 25%. Sugar beet stand density and biomass were reduced by about 40% and 25%, respectively, at metribuzin residue levels below the limit of detection. Similarly, flumioxazin reduced stand density and biomass by 50% at residue levels below the limit of detection. Stand density and biomass reduction due to mesotrione exceeded 50% even at residue levels below the limit of detection. Imazamox and terbacil caused minimal sugar beet stand and biomass reduction at residue levels below the limit of detection. These results demonstrate that laboratory analysis of herbicide residue levels in the soil must be accompanied by a bioassay to determine the potential crop damage from herbicide carryover.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70131\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.70131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.70131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于那些怀疑除草剂残留到甜菜(Beta vulgaris L.)中的农民,一个常见的建议是进行实验室测试,以评估土壤中的除草剂残留水平。虽然这通常是一种很好的做法,但目前还没有关于这些实验室测试结果如何与甜菜损害或产量损失联系起来的指导方针。在2022年和2023年进行了温室研究,以评估六种除草剂(氟恶嗪、伊马唑莫、美索三酮、美曲津、利姆磺隆和特菌清)的土壤残留水平与甜菜生长和生长减少之间的关系。在低于实验室检测限度的水平下,利姆磺隆使甜菜林分密度降低50%以上,生物量降低25%。在低于检测限的情况下,甜菜林分密度和生物量分别降低约40%和25%。同样,氟恶嗪在低于检测限度的残留水平下使林分密度和生物量降低50%。即使在残留量低于检测限度的情况下,由于中三酮导致的林分密度和生物量减少也超过50%。Imazamox和terbacil在低于检测限度的残留水平下对甜菜林分和生物量造成最小的减少。这些结果表明,对土壤中除草剂残留水平的实验室分析必须伴随着生物测定,以确定除草剂残留对作物的潜在危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Relating soil herbicide residue levels to sugar beet stand and growth reduction

Relating soil herbicide residue levels to sugar beet stand and growth reduction

Relating soil herbicide residue levels to sugar beet stand and growth reduction

Relating soil herbicide residue levels to sugar beet stand and growth reduction

One common recommendation given to farmers who suspect herbicide carryover to sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is to conduct laboratory tests to assess herbicide residue levels in the soil. While this is often a good practice, there are currently no guidelines on how these laboratory test results relate to sugar beet damage or yield loss. Greenhouse studies were conducted in 2022 and 2023 to assess the relationship between soil residue levels of six herbicides (flumioxazin, imazamox, mesotrione, metribuzin, rimsulfuron, and terbacil) and sugar beet stand and growth reduction. At levels below the limit of detection in the laboratory, rimsulfuron reduced sugar beet stand density by more than 50% and biomass by 25%. Sugar beet stand density and biomass were reduced by about 40% and 25%, respectively, at metribuzin residue levels below the limit of detection. Similarly, flumioxazin reduced stand density and biomass by 50% at residue levels below the limit of detection. Stand density and biomass reduction due to mesotrione exceeded 50% even at residue levels below the limit of detection. Imazamox and terbacil caused minimal sugar beet stand and biomass reduction at residue levels below the limit of detection. These results demonstrate that laboratory analysis of herbicide residue levels in the soil must be accompanied by a bioassay to determine the potential crop damage from herbicide carryover.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信