澳大利亚慢性病患者及其家属自费医疗保健和药品的生活经验:对定性文献的系统审查

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jane Desborough , Charles Maskell-Knight , Shelley Wang , Anne Parkinson , Danielle Butler , Hsei-Di Law , Kamania Butler , Leanne Watts , Elisabeth Huynh , Fiona Hodson , Samar Ibrahim , Julie Veitch , Jillian Kingsford-Smith , Michael Kidd , Cam Donaldson
{"title":"澳大利亚慢性病患者及其家属自费医疗保健和药品的生活经验:对定性文献的系统审查","authors":"Jane Desborough ,&nbsp;Charles Maskell-Knight ,&nbsp;Shelley Wang ,&nbsp;Anne Parkinson ,&nbsp;Danielle Butler ,&nbsp;Hsei-Di Law ,&nbsp;Kamania Butler ,&nbsp;Leanne Watts ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Huynh ,&nbsp;Fiona Hodson ,&nbsp;Samar Ibrahim ,&nbsp;Julie Veitch ,&nbsp;Jillian Kingsford-Smith ,&nbsp;Michael Kidd ,&nbsp;Cam Donaldson","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite Australia’s universal health insurance scheme, Medicare, out-of-pocket costs (OOPC) for health care comprises 14 % of total health expenditure. People with chronic conditions spend a greater proportion of their incomes on health care than people without a chronic condition.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To review the qualitative literature examining experiences of OOPC of out-of-hospital care by people with chronic conditions and to discuss this in relation to current Australian health policy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the qualitative literature examining OOPC for people with chronic conditions in Australia. Search: Pubmed, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and EconLit databases from 1999 to 10<sup>th</sup> April 2025.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>37 studies met the inclusion criteria. Reduced or lost employment due to ill-health led to income loss, aggravating the financial burden of health management. While many people were able to access bulk-billing general practitioners, challenges in affording upfront and copayments for medical and allied health consultations, and medication costs were reported. Cost was the greatest barrier to accessing dental care. Trade-offs were described between health management and meeting basic living needs, particularly for people who earned too much to qualify for government welfare payments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While Australian health policies effectively reduce the financial burden of health care for many people, distinct challenges exist for groups ineligible for concessional thresholds. Future research to identify the priorities and preferences of people with chronic conditions can further inform policy to improve the equity of health financing in Australia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 105359"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lived experience of out-of-pocket costs of health care and medicines by people with chronic conditions and their families in Australia: a systematic review of the qualitative literature\",\"authors\":\"Jane Desborough ,&nbsp;Charles Maskell-Knight ,&nbsp;Shelley Wang ,&nbsp;Anne Parkinson ,&nbsp;Danielle Butler ,&nbsp;Hsei-Di Law ,&nbsp;Kamania Butler ,&nbsp;Leanne Watts ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Huynh ,&nbsp;Fiona Hodson ,&nbsp;Samar Ibrahim ,&nbsp;Julie Veitch ,&nbsp;Jillian Kingsford-Smith ,&nbsp;Michael Kidd ,&nbsp;Cam Donaldson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite Australia’s universal health insurance scheme, Medicare, out-of-pocket costs (OOPC) for health care comprises 14 % of total health expenditure. People with chronic conditions spend a greater proportion of their incomes on health care than people without a chronic condition.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To review the qualitative literature examining experiences of OOPC of out-of-hospital care by people with chronic conditions and to discuss this in relation to current Australian health policy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the qualitative literature examining OOPC for people with chronic conditions in Australia. Search: Pubmed, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and EconLit databases from 1999 to 10<sup>th</sup> April 2025.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>37 studies met the inclusion criteria. Reduced or lost employment due to ill-health led to income loss, aggravating the financial burden of health management. While many people were able to access bulk-billing general practitioners, challenges in affording upfront and copayments for medical and allied health consultations, and medication costs were reported. Cost was the greatest barrier to accessing dental care. Trade-offs were described between health management and meeting basic living needs, particularly for people who earned too much to qualify for government welfare payments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While Australian health policies effectively reduce the financial burden of health care for many people, distinct challenges exist for groups ineligible for concessional thresholds. Future research to identify the priorities and preferences of people with chronic conditions can further inform policy to improve the equity of health financing in Australia.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"158 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001150\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管澳大利亚实行了全民医疗保险计划,但医疗保健的自付费用占卫生总支出的14%。慢性病患者在医疗保健方面的支出占其收入的比例高于无慢性病患者。目的回顾定性文献,考察慢性病患者院外护理的OOPC经验,并讨论这与当前澳大利亚卫生政策的关系。方法对澳大利亚慢性疾病患者OOPC的定性文献进行系统综述和叙事综合。检索:Pubmed, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO和EconLit数据库,1999 - 2025年4月10日。结果37项研究符合纳入标准。由于健康状况不佳而减少或失去就业导致收入损失,加重了健康管理的财政负担。虽然许多人能够获得全科医生的大额收费,但据报告,在支付医疗和联合健康咨询的预付和共付费用以及药物费用方面存在挑战。费用是获得牙科护理的最大障碍。报告描述了健康管理和满足基本生活需求之间的权衡,特别是对那些收入过高而没有资格领取政府福利金的人。结论虽然澳大利亚的卫生政策有效地减轻了许多人的卫生保健经济负担,但对于没有资格享受优惠门槛的群体来说,存在着明显的挑战。未来的研究确定慢性病患者的优先事项和偏好,可以进一步为政策提供信息,以改善澳大利亚卫生筹资的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lived experience of out-of-pocket costs of health care and medicines by people with chronic conditions and their families in Australia: a systematic review of the qualitative literature

Background

Despite Australia’s universal health insurance scheme, Medicare, out-of-pocket costs (OOPC) for health care comprises 14 % of total health expenditure. People with chronic conditions spend a greater proportion of their incomes on health care than people without a chronic condition.

Objective

To review the qualitative literature examining experiences of OOPC of out-of-hospital care by people with chronic conditions and to discuss this in relation to current Australian health policy.

Methods

Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the qualitative literature examining OOPC for people with chronic conditions in Australia. Search: Pubmed, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and EconLit databases from 1999 to 10th April 2025.

Results

37 studies met the inclusion criteria. Reduced or lost employment due to ill-health led to income loss, aggravating the financial burden of health management. While many people were able to access bulk-billing general practitioners, challenges in affording upfront and copayments for medical and allied health consultations, and medication costs were reported. Cost was the greatest barrier to accessing dental care. Trade-offs were described between health management and meeting basic living needs, particularly for people who earned too much to qualify for government welfare payments.

Conclusion

While Australian health policies effectively reduce the financial burden of health care for many people, distinct challenges exist for groups ineligible for concessional thresholds. Future research to identify the priorities and preferences of people with chronic conditions can further inform policy to improve the equity of health financing in Australia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信