Hyunjun Ahn BS , Yadi Li MEd , Brittany Lapin PhD, MPH , Maximos McCune BA , Irene Katzan MD, MS
{"title":"患者报告的脑静脉血栓与缺血性脑卒中的预后比较","authors":"Hyunjun Ahn BS , Yadi Li MEd , Brittany Lapin PhD, MPH , Maximos McCune BA , Irene Katzan MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Although both cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) and ischemic stroke involve cerebrovascular flow disruption, they differ in pathophysiology, clinical features, and outcomes. This study compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and their trajectories over time between CVT and ischemic stroke patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included patients hospitalized for CVT or ischemic stroke who completed at least one of the following PRO in cerebrovascular clinic between January 2019 and April 2024: Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PROMIS Global Health, Neuro-QoL cognitive function, and PROMIS scales for pain interference, physical function, social role satisfaction, fatigue, self-efficacy and sleep disturbance. CVT patients were matched (1:3) with ischemic stroke patients by propensity scores. PROs were compared over time using mixed-effects models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 72 CVT and 2,533 ischemic stroke patients, 69 CVT and 196 ischemic stroke patients were included after matching (average age 47.5 ± 17.0 years, 62.6% female, median modified Rankin score 1). Brain tissue injury occurred in 30.6% of CVT patients. Both groups exhibited comparable PROs, but CVT patients reported worse pain interference, and worsening PROMIS global mental health and health-related quality of life over time compared to ischemic stroke patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite favorable functional outcomes and lower rates of brain injury, CVT patients had worse or comparable PROs in severity and patterns compared to the subset of ischemic stroke patients with similar baseline characteristics. Traditional clinical assessments may not fully capture the impact of CVT, and a holistic care approach addressing broader spectrum of outcomes, in addition to vascular pathology, could be beneficial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":"34 8","pages":"Article 108354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient reported outcomes of cerebral venous thrombosis compared to ischemic stroke\",\"authors\":\"Hyunjun Ahn BS , Yadi Li MEd , Brittany Lapin PhD, MPH , Maximos McCune BA , Irene Katzan MD, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Although both cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) and ischemic stroke involve cerebrovascular flow disruption, they differ in pathophysiology, clinical features, and outcomes. This study compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and their trajectories over time between CVT and ischemic stroke patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included patients hospitalized for CVT or ischemic stroke who completed at least one of the following PRO in cerebrovascular clinic between January 2019 and April 2024: Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PROMIS Global Health, Neuro-QoL cognitive function, and PROMIS scales for pain interference, physical function, social role satisfaction, fatigue, self-efficacy and sleep disturbance. CVT patients were matched (1:3) with ischemic stroke patients by propensity scores. PROs were compared over time using mixed-effects models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 72 CVT and 2,533 ischemic stroke patients, 69 CVT and 196 ischemic stroke patients were included after matching (average age 47.5 ± 17.0 years, 62.6% female, median modified Rankin score 1). Brain tissue injury occurred in 30.6% of CVT patients. Both groups exhibited comparable PROs, but CVT patients reported worse pain interference, and worsening PROMIS global mental health and health-related quality of life over time compared to ischemic stroke patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite favorable functional outcomes and lower rates of brain injury, CVT patients had worse or comparable PROs in severity and patterns compared to the subset of ischemic stroke patients with similar baseline characteristics. Traditional clinical assessments may not fully capture the impact of CVT, and a holistic care approach addressing broader spectrum of outcomes, in addition to vascular pathology, could be beneficial.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 108354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305725001326\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305725001326","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient reported outcomes of cerebral venous thrombosis compared to ischemic stroke
Purpose
Although both cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) and ischemic stroke involve cerebrovascular flow disruption, they differ in pathophysiology, clinical features, and outcomes. This study compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and their trajectories over time between CVT and ischemic stroke patients.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included patients hospitalized for CVT or ischemic stroke who completed at least one of the following PRO in cerebrovascular clinic between January 2019 and April 2024: Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PROMIS Global Health, Neuro-QoL cognitive function, and PROMIS scales for pain interference, physical function, social role satisfaction, fatigue, self-efficacy and sleep disturbance. CVT patients were matched (1:3) with ischemic stroke patients by propensity scores. PROs were compared over time using mixed-effects models.
Results
Of 72 CVT and 2,533 ischemic stroke patients, 69 CVT and 196 ischemic stroke patients were included after matching (average age 47.5 ± 17.0 years, 62.6% female, median modified Rankin score 1). Brain tissue injury occurred in 30.6% of CVT patients. Both groups exhibited comparable PROs, but CVT patients reported worse pain interference, and worsening PROMIS global mental health and health-related quality of life over time compared to ischemic stroke patients.
Conclusions
Despite favorable functional outcomes and lower rates of brain injury, CVT patients had worse or comparable PROs in severity and patterns compared to the subset of ischemic stroke patients with similar baseline characteristics. Traditional clinical assessments may not fully capture the impact of CVT, and a holistic care approach addressing broader spectrum of outcomes, in addition to vascular pathology, could be beneficial.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.