欧盟人工智能驱动的替代和在线争议解决:法律框架分析和拟议分类

IF 3.2 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Aura Esther Vilalta Nicuesa, Marian Gili Saldaña
{"title":"欧盟人工智能驱动的替代和在线争议解决:法律框架分析和拟议分类","authors":"Aura Esther Vilalta Nicuesa,&nbsp;Marian Gili Saldaña","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper focuses on the impact of the new EU AI Act in alternative and online dispute resolution. After briefly analysing the state of the art regarding international regulations on artificial intelligence (AI) and the strategy followed in the European Union (EU) in the field of dispute resolution, the research provides a critical discursive overview of the international existing legal guidelines and frameworks for the use of AI in dispute resolution, aiming to identify the different levels of risk addressed by the EU IA Act in this context. The paper also offers forward-looking reflections intended to contribute to the improvement of the current legal framework on AI applied to dispute resolution in the EU. To this end, it identifies various AI tools applicable to the justice sector, highlighting their main advantages and limitations. It then outlines the most relevant hard law and soft law instruments at both international and European levels, with a particular focus on the strategy implemented by the EU leading to the adoption of the current EU AI Act. The study also reviews initiatives carried out by organisations to promote the ethical use of AI in judicial systems and examines the legislative approach adopted by the EU to regulate AI in the field of justice. Finally, the paper proposes a new categorisation of AI-assisted alternative and online dispute resolution mechanisms based on their degree of risk and autonomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51516,"journal":{"name":"Computer Law & Security Review","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 106145"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-driven alternative and online dispute resolution in the European Union: An analysis of the legal framework and a proposed categorization\",\"authors\":\"Aura Esther Vilalta Nicuesa,&nbsp;Marian Gili Saldaña\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper focuses on the impact of the new EU AI Act in alternative and online dispute resolution. After briefly analysing the state of the art regarding international regulations on artificial intelligence (AI) and the strategy followed in the European Union (EU) in the field of dispute resolution, the research provides a critical discursive overview of the international existing legal guidelines and frameworks for the use of AI in dispute resolution, aiming to identify the different levels of risk addressed by the EU IA Act in this context. The paper also offers forward-looking reflections intended to contribute to the improvement of the current legal framework on AI applied to dispute resolution in the EU. To this end, it identifies various AI tools applicable to the justice sector, highlighting their main advantages and limitations. It then outlines the most relevant hard law and soft law instruments at both international and European levels, with a particular focus on the strategy implemented by the EU leading to the adoption of the current EU AI Act. The study also reviews initiatives carried out by organisations to promote the ethical use of AI in judicial systems and examines the legislative approach adopted by the EU to regulate AI in the field of justice. Finally, the paper proposes a new categorisation of AI-assisted alternative and online dispute resolution mechanisms based on their degree of risk and autonomy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212473X25000185\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Law & Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212473X25000185","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要讨论欧盟新人工智能法案对替代性和在线争议解决的影响。在简要分析了有关人工智能(AI)的国际法规的最新状况以及欧盟(EU)在争议解决领域所遵循的战略之后,本研究对在争议解决中使用人工智能的国际现有法律指导方针和框架进行了批判性的论述概述,旨在确定欧盟《人工智能法》在此背景下所解决的不同级别的风险。本文还提供了前瞻性的思考,旨在为改善欧盟目前适用于争议解决的人工智能法律框架做出贡献。为此,它确定了适用于司法部门的各种人工智能工具,突出了它们的主要优势和局限性。然后,它概述了国际和欧洲层面最相关的硬法和软法文书,特别关注欧盟实施的战略,从而通过了当前的欧盟人工智能法案。该研究还审查了各组织为促进人工智能在司法系统中的道德使用而采取的举措,并审查了欧盟为规范司法领域的人工智能而采取的立法方法。最后,本文提出了一种基于风险程度和自主性的人工智能辅助替代和在线争议解决机制的新分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AI-driven alternative and online dispute resolution in the European Union: An analysis of the legal framework and a proposed categorization
This paper focuses on the impact of the new EU AI Act in alternative and online dispute resolution. After briefly analysing the state of the art regarding international regulations on artificial intelligence (AI) and the strategy followed in the European Union (EU) in the field of dispute resolution, the research provides a critical discursive overview of the international existing legal guidelines and frameworks for the use of AI in dispute resolution, aiming to identify the different levels of risk addressed by the EU IA Act in this context. The paper also offers forward-looking reflections intended to contribute to the improvement of the current legal framework on AI applied to dispute resolution in the EU. To this end, it identifies various AI tools applicable to the justice sector, highlighting their main advantages and limitations. It then outlines the most relevant hard law and soft law instruments at both international and European levels, with a particular focus on the strategy implemented by the EU leading to the adoption of the current EU AI Act. The study also reviews initiatives carried out by organisations to promote the ethical use of AI in judicial systems and examines the legislative approach adopted by the EU to regulate AI in the field of justice. Finally, the paper proposes a new categorisation of AI-assisted alternative and online dispute resolution mechanisms based on their degree of risk and autonomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: CLSR publishes refereed academic and practitioner papers on topics such as Web 2.0, IT security, Identity management, ID cards, RFID, interference with privacy, Internet law, telecoms regulation, online broadcasting, intellectual property, software law, e-commerce, outsourcing, data protection, EU policy, freedom of information, computer security and many other topics. In addition it provides a regular update on European Union developments, national news from more than 20 jurisdictions in both Europe and the Pacific Rim. It is looking for papers within the subject area that display good quality legal analysis and new lines of legal thought or policy development that go beyond mere description of the subject area, however accurate that may be.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信