肿瘤特征对经鼻内镜入路治疗鞍结节和蝶状平面脑膜瘤的影响:单中心经验。

Ludovica Pasquini, Chandrima Biswas, Joshua Vignolles-Jeong, Moataz D Abouammo, Ricardo L Carrau, Daniel M Prevedello
{"title":"肿瘤特征对经鼻内镜入路治疗鞍结节和蝶状平面脑膜瘤的影响:单中心经验。","authors":"Ludovica Pasquini, Chandrima Biswas, Joshua Vignolles-Jeong, Moataz D Abouammo, Ricardo L Carrau, Daniel M Prevedello","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The expanded endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has emerged as a viable alternative technique for the removal of tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) and planum sphenoidale meningioma (PSM), offering early tumor devascularization, wide optic canal decompression, while avoiding brain manipulation. The authors present 13-year experience with retrospective analysis evaluating the impact of tumor characteristics on the outcomes of TSM and PSM resections using the expanded EEA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent expanded EEA for TSMs or PSMs from 2010 to 2022 were analyzed. Patient's demographics, preoperative evaluations, tumor features, previous treatments, surgical outcomes, complications, follow-up, and recurrence rates were reviewed. Meningiomas were classified using the Sekhar-Mortazavi classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 52 patients (32 with TSMs and 20 with PSMs). Visual impairment was the most common presenting symptom, occurring in 41 patients (78.8%). Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 42 patients (80.7%), reaching 92% for Sekhar-Mortazavi class I tumors. GTR rates decreased with larger tumor size, optic pathway involvement, and vascular encasement. Fibrous and fibroelastic tumors had lower resection rates. The postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak rate decreased from 23.3% (2010-2017) to 9% (2018-2022), and 34 patients (79%) experienced visual improvement after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The expanded EEA is a safe and effective technique for the resection of TSM and PSM, facilitating GTR and improving visual outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Tumor Characteristics on Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to Tuberculum Sellae and Planum Sphenoidale Meningiomas: Single Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Ludovica Pasquini, Chandrima Biswas, Joshua Vignolles-Jeong, Moataz D Abouammo, Ricardo L Carrau, Daniel M Prevedello\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/ons.0000000000001635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The expanded endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has emerged as a viable alternative technique for the removal of tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) and planum sphenoidale meningioma (PSM), offering early tumor devascularization, wide optic canal decompression, while avoiding brain manipulation. The authors present 13-year experience with retrospective analysis evaluating the impact of tumor characteristics on the outcomes of TSM and PSM resections using the expanded EEA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent expanded EEA for TSMs or PSMs from 2010 to 2022 were analyzed. Patient's demographics, preoperative evaluations, tumor features, previous treatments, surgical outcomes, complications, follow-up, and recurrence rates were reviewed. Meningiomas were classified using the Sekhar-Mortazavi classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 52 patients (32 with TSMs and 20 with PSMs). Visual impairment was the most common presenting symptom, occurring in 41 patients (78.8%). Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 42 patients (80.7%), reaching 92% for Sekhar-Mortazavi class I tumors. GTR rates decreased with larger tumor size, optic pathway involvement, and vascular encasement. Fibrous and fibroelastic tumors had lower resection rates. The postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak rate decreased from 23.3% (2010-2017) to 9% (2018-2022), and 34 patients (79%) experienced visual improvement after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The expanded EEA is a safe and effective technique for the resection of TSM and PSM, facilitating GTR and improving visual outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001635\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:扩大内镜鼻内入路(EEA)已成为切除鞍结节脑膜瘤(TSM)和蝶状平面脑膜瘤(PSM)的可行替代技术,可提供早期肿瘤断流术,宽视神经管减压,同时避免脑部操作。作者介绍了13年的回顾性分析经验,评估肿瘤特征对使用扩展EEA切除TSM和PSM结果的影响。方法:对2010年至2022年因tsm或psm接受扩展EEA治疗的患者进行分析。回顾了患者的人口统计学、术前评估、肿瘤特征、既往治疗、手术结果、并发症、随访和复发率。脑膜瘤采用Sekhar-Mortazavi分类。结果:共纳入52例患者,其中TSMs 32例,PSMs 20例。视力障碍是最常见的症状,41例(78.8%)。42例(80.7%)患者实现了总切除(GTR),其中Sekhar-Mortazavi I类肿瘤达到92%。GTR率随肿瘤大小、视神经通路受累和血管包裹而降低。纤维性和纤维弹性肿瘤的切除率较低。术后脑脊液漏率由23.3%(2010-2017年)降至9%(2018-2022年),34例(79%)患者术后视力改善。结论:扩大EEA是一种安全有效的切除TSM和PSM的技术,可促进GTR,改善视觉效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Tumor Characteristics on Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to Tuberculum Sellae and Planum Sphenoidale Meningiomas: Single Center Experience.

Background and objectives: The expanded endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has emerged as a viable alternative technique for the removal of tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) and planum sphenoidale meningioma (PSM), offering early tumor devascularization, wide optic canal decompression, while avoiding brain manipulation. The authors present 13-year experience with retrospective analysis evaluating the impact of tumor characteristics on the outcomes of TSM and PSM resections using the expanded EEA.

Methods: Patients who underwent expanded EEA for TSMs or PSMs from 2010 to 2022 were analyzed. Patient's demographics, preoperative evaluations, tumor features, previous treatments, surgical outcomes, complications, follow-up, and recurrence rates were reviewed. Meningiomas were classified using the Sekhar-Mortazavi classification.

Results: The study included 52 patients (32 with TSMs and 20 with PSMs). Visual impairment was the most common presenting symptom, occurring in 41 patients (78.8%). Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 42 patients (80.7%), reaching 92% for Sekhar-Mortazavi class I tumors. GTR rates decreased with larger tumor size, optic pathway involvement, and vascular encasement. Fibrous and fibroelastic tumors had lower resection rates. The postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak rate decreased from 23.3% (2010-2017) to 9% (2018-2022), and 34 patients (79%) experienced visual improvement after surgery.

Conclusion: The expanded EEA is a safe and effective technique for the resection of TSM and PSM, facilitating GTR and improving visual outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信