持续θ波爆发刺激对强迫症(OCD)患者的影响:随机假对照试验的系统回顾和meta分析。

Moiz Ul Haq Hashmi, Mahadev Khurana, Syeda Fizza Qadri, Fatima Kaleem Ahmed, Faiqa Iqbal, Talat Mehmood, Wafa Farhan, Sahil Kumar, Aneesha Kumari
{"title":"持续θ波爆发刺激对强迫症(OCD)患者的影响:随机假对照试验的系统回顾和meta分析。","authors":"Moiz Ul Haq Hashmi, Mahadev Khurana, Syeda Fizza Qadri, Fatima Kaleem Ahmed, Faiqa Iqbal, Talat Mehmood, Wafa Farhan, Sahil Kumar, Aneesha Kumari","doi":"10.1007/s11126-025-10152-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite standard pharmacological and behavioral therapies, a significant proportion of patients with obsessive‒compulsive disorder (OCD) have a suboptimal or no response. Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) is a novel variant of traditional transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) that has shown promising results in a wide array of behavioral disorders. To integrate the evidence of its role in OCD, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a comprehensive literature search from inception until June 2024 on PubMed, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, Embase, and clinical trial registries. Six RCTs were identified and included in our study. Data regarding obsessive‒compulsive symptoms, depression, and anxiety were extracted and analyzed via a random effects model. We found no significant differences between the active and sham groups regarding the change in obsessive‒compulsive symptoms, neither immediately posttreatment (p = 0.98) nor at follow-up (p = 0.83). Similarly, neither group was superior in alleviating concomitant anxiety and depression. Owing to the limited number of studies and their variability in terms of brain targets and the total number of pulses administered, we cannot definitively conclude the effectiveness of cTBS in patients with OCD. However, our research highlights it as a potentially safe treatment option with no serious side effects. Future investigators should aim to optimize intervention protocols and utilize neuronavigation techniques for accurate delivery of pulses to targeted brain loci. High-powered trials with sufficient sample sizes are needed to gain deeper insight into the effects of cTBS on primary and secondary clinical manifestations of OCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":520814,"journal":{"name":"The Psychiatric quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of continuous theta burst stimulation on patients with obsessive‒compulsive disorder (OCD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Moiz Ul Haq Hashmi, Mahadev Khurana, Syeda Fizza Qadri, Fatima Kaleem Ahmed, Faiqa Iqbal, Talat Mehmood, Wafa Farhan, Sahil Kumar, Aneesha Kumari\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11126-025-10152-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite standard pharmacological and behavioral therapies, a significant proportion of patients with obsessive‒compulsive disorder (OCD) have a suboptimal or no response. Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) is a novel variant of traditional transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) that has shown promising results in a wide array of behavioral disorders. To integrate the evidence of its role in OCD, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a comprehensive literature search from inception until June 2024 on PubMed, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, Embase, and clinical trial registries. Six RCTs were identified and included in our study. Data regarding obsessive‒compulsive symptoms, depression, and anxiety were extracted and analyzed via a random effects model. We found no significant differences between the active and sham groups regarding the change in obsessive‒compulsive symptoms, neither immediately posttreatment (p = 0.98) nor at follow-up (p = 0.83). Similarly, neither group was superior in alleviating concomitant anxiety and depression. Owing to the limited number of studies and their variability in terms of brain targets and the total number of pulses administered, we cannot definitively conclude the effectiveness of cTBS in patients with OCD. However, our research highlights it as a potentially safe treatment option with no serious side effects. Future investigators should aim to optimize intervention protocols and utilize neuronavigation techniques for accurate delivery of pulses to targeted brain loci. High-powered trials with sufficient sample sizes are needed to gain deeper insight into the effects of cTBS on primary and secondary clinical manifestations of OCD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Psychiatric quarterly\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Psychiatric quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-025-10152-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Psychiatric quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-025-10152-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管标准的药理学和行为疗法,很大比例的强迫症(OCD)患者有次优反应或没有反应。连续θ波爆发刺激(cTBS)是传统经颅磁刺激(TMS)的一种新变体,在一系列行为障碍中显示出良好的效果。为了整合其在强迫症中作用的证据,我们对相关的随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们在PubMed、b谷歌Scholar、PsycINFO、Embase和临床试验注册中心进行了从成立到2024年6月的全面文献检索。6项随机对照试验被纳入我们的研究。强迫性症状、抑郁和焦虑的数据提取并通过随机效应模型进行分析。我们发现,在治疗后立即(p = 0.98)和随访时(p = 0.83),活跃组和假手术组在强迫症状的改变方面没有显著差异。同样,两组在减轻伴随的焦虑和抑郁方面都没有优势。由于研究数量有限,而且在脑靶点和脉冲总数方面存在差异,因此我们无法确定cTBS对强迫症患者的有效性。然而,我们的研究强调它是一种潜在的安全治疗选择,没有严重的副作用。未来的研究人员应该致力于优化干预方案,并利用神经导航技术将脉冲准确地传递到目标脑位点。为了更深入地了解cTBS对强迫症的原发性和继发性临床表现的影响,需要有足够样本量的高强度试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of continuous theta burst stimulation on patients with obsessive‒compulsive disorder (OCD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham controlled trials.

Despite standard pharmacological and behavioral therapies, a significant proportion of patients with obsessive‒compulsive disorder (OCD) have a suboptimal or no response. Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) is a novel variant of traditional transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) that has shown promising results in a wide array of behavioral disorders. To integrate the evidence of its role in OCD, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a comprehensive literature search from inception until June 2024 on PubMed, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, Embase, and clinical trial registries. Six RCTs were identified and included in our study. Data regarding obsessive‒compulsive symptoms, depression, and anxiety were extracted and analyzed via a random effects model. We found no significant differences between the active and sham groups regarding the change in obsessive‒compulsive symptoms, neither immediately posttreatment (p = 0.98) nor at follow-up (p = 0.83). Similarly, neither group was superior in alleviating concomitant anxiety and depression. Owing to the limited number of studies and their variability in terms of brain targets and the total number of pulses administered, we cannot definitively conclude the effectiveness of cTBS in patients with OCD. However, our research highlights it as a potentially safe treatment option with no serious side effects. Future investigators should aim to optimize intervention protocols and utilize neuronavigation techniques for accurate delivery of pulses to targeted brain loci. High-powered trials with sufficient sample sizes are needed to gain deeper insight into the effects of cTBS on primary and secondary clinical manifestations of OCD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信