肘关节活动能力自我评估作为桡骨头骨折术后随访检查的可靠方法。

Johannes Porsche, Patrick Ziegler, Tina Histing, Marc-Daniel Ahrend, Sven Maier, Cornelius Sebastian Fischer
{"title":"肘关节活动能力自我评估作为桡骨头骨折术后随访检查的可靠方法。","authors":"Johannes Porsche, Patrick Ziegler, Tina Histing, Marc-Daniel Ahrend, Sven Maier, Cornelius Sebastian Fischer","doi":"10.1055/a-2593-9161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sufficient follow-up of fractures is often difficult, due to age-related, health-related or geographical reasons. Self-assessment of the patient's functional outcome could be an alternative to a personal medical examination. There is a lack of validated questionnaires to record these parameters for elbow injuries. The aim of the study was to validate the patient's self-assessment of the range of motion following surgical treatment of complex radial head fractures.50 patients (42% women) with a mean age of 49.7 ± 13.8 years (range 25-82 years) with a surgically treated radial head fracture (Mason III or IV) were examined, 39.6 ± 23.3 months postoperatively. The fracture was treated with radial head reconstruction (60%) or radial head prosthesis (40%). The follow-up examination included the assessment of elbow mobility using a questionnaire (Elbow Motion Assessment Score) and physical examination using a goniometer. In addition, quality of life was assessed using the SF-36 Health Survey. The agreement of the mobility was recorded as a percentage using Spearman's correlation.Exact agreement between examiner and patient was achieved at 54% in flexion, 40% in extension, 86% in pronation and 54% in supination. The median deviations in agreement were 10° in extension and flexion and 20° in pronation and supination. The correlations were r = 0.550 (flexion), r = 0.841 (extension), r = 0.808 (pronation) and r = 0.754 (supination). Patients who agreed with the examiner on the movements achieved a higher score in the SF-36 Health Survey than patients who did not agree with the examiner (50.5 to 54.1 vs. 40.0 to 45.5).The survey of the range of motion by the patient using a questionnaire showed a high level of agreement with the measurement by an objective examiner. Such self-assessment can therefore be seen as a suitable, cost-effective alternative in the follow-up examination of surgically treated radial head fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94274,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-assessment of Elbow Mobility as a Reliable Method in the Postoperative Follow-up Examination of Radial Head Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Johannes Porsche, Patrick Ziegler, Tina Histing, Marc-Daniel Ahrend, Sven Maier, Cornelius Sebastian Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2593-9161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sufficient follow-up of fractures is often difficult, due to age-related, health-related or geographical reasons. Self-assessment of the patient's functional outcome could be an alternative to a personal medical examination. There is a lack of validated questionnaires to record these parameters for elbow injuries. The aim of the study was to validate the patient's self-assessment of the range of motion following surgical treatment of complex radial head fractures.50 patients (42% women) with a mean age of 49.7 ± 13.8 years (range 25-82 years) with a surgically treated radial head fracture (Mason III or IV) were examined, 39.6 ± 23.3 months postoperatively. The fracture was treated with radial head reconstruction (60%) or radial head prosthesis (40%). The follow-up examination included the assessment of elbow mobility using a questionnaire (Elbow Motion Assessment Score) and physical examination using a goniometer. In addition, quality of life was assessed using the SF-36 Health Survey. The agreement of the mobility was recorded as a percentage using Spearman's correlation.Exact agreement between examiner and patient was achieved at 54% in flexion, 40% in extension, 86% in pronation and 54% in supination. The median deviations in agreement were 10° in extension and flexion and 20° in pronation and supination. The correlations were r = 0.550 (flexion), r = 0.841 (extension), r = 0.808 (pronation) and r = 0.754 (supination). Patients who agreed with the examiner on the movements achieved a higher score in the SF-36 Health Survey than patients who did not agree with the examiner (50.5 to 54.1 vs. 40.0 to 45.5).The survey of the range of motion by the patient using a questionnaire showed a high level of agreement with the measurement by an objective examiner. Such self-assessment can therefore be seen as a suitable, cost-effective alternative in the follow-up examination of surgically treated radial head fractures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2593-9161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2593-9161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于年龄相关、健康相关或地理原因,骨折的充分随访往往很困难。自我评估病人的功能结果可以替代个人医学检查。目前缺乏有效的问卷来记录肘部损伤的这些参数。该研究的目的是验证复杂桡骨头骨折手术治疗后患者对活动范围的自我评估。手术治疗桡骨头骨折(Mason III或IV型)的患者50例(42%为女性),平均年龄49.7±13.8岁(25-82岁),术后39.6±23.3个月。桡骨头重建术(60%)或桡骨头假体(40%)治疗骨折。随访检查包括使用问卷(肘关节运动评估评分)评估肘关节活动度和使用测角仪进行体格检查。此外,使用SF-36健康调查评估生活质量。流动性的一致性被记录为一个百分比,使用斯皮尔曼的相关性。屈曲54%,伸展40%,旋前86%,旋后54%,检查者和患者之间完全一致。一致的中位偏差在伸屈时为10°,在旋前和旋后时为20°。r = 0.550(屈曲),r = 0.841(伸展),r = 0.808(旋前),r = 0.754(旋后)。在SF-36健康调查中,同意考官动作的患者比不同意考官动作的患者得分更高(50.5 ~ 54.1比40.0 ~ 45.5)。患者使用问卷对活动范围进行调查,结果与客观审查员的测量结果高度一致。因此,在手术治疗的桡骨头骨折的随访检查中,这种自我评估可以被视为一种合适的、具有成本效益的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-assessment of Elbow Mobility as a Reliable Method in the Postoperative Follow-up Examination of Radial Head Fractures.

Sufficient follow-up of fractures is often difficult, due to age-related, health-related or geographical reasons. Self-assessment of the patient's functional outcome could be an alternative to a personal medical examination. There is a lack of validated questionnaires to record these parameters for elbow injuries. The aim of the study was to validate the patient's self-assessment of the range of motion following surgical treatment of complex radial head fractures.50 patients (42% women) with a mean age of 49.7 ± 13.8 years (range 25-82 years) with a surgically treated radial head fracture (Mason III or IV) were examined, 39.6 ± 23.3 months postoperatively. The fracture was treated with radial head reconstruction (60%) or radial head prosthesis (40%). The follow-up examination included the assessment of elbow mobility using a questionnaire (Elbow Motion Assessment Score) and physical examination using a goniometer. In addition, quality of life was assessed using the SF-36 Health Survey. The agreement of the mobility was recorded as a percentage using Spearman's correlation.Exact agreement between examiner and patient was achieved at 54% in flexion, 40% in extension, 86% in pronation and 54% in supination. The median deviations in agreement were 10° in extension and flexion and 20° in pronation and supination. The correlations were r = 0.550 (flexion), r = 0.841 (extension), r = 0.808 (pronation) and r = 0.754 (supination). Patients who agreed with the examiner on the movements achieved a higher score in the SF-36 Health Survey than patients who did not agree with the examiner (50.5 to 54.1 vs. 40.0 to 45.5).The survey of the range of motion by the patient using a questionnaire showed a high level of agreement with the measurement by an objective examiner. Such self-assessment can therefore be seen as a suitable, cost-effective alternative in the follow-up examination of surgically treated radial head fractures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信