以能力为基础的医学教育时代的模拟教育:加拿大急诊医学课程中使用模拟教育的研究。

IF 2.4
CJEM Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00935-0
Patrick Fisk, Andrew K Hall, Michael O'Brien, Warren J Cheung
{"title":"以能力为基础的医学教育时代的模拟教育:加拿大急诊医学课程中使用模拟教育的研究。","authors":"Patrick Fisk, Andrew K Hall, Michael O'Brien, Warren J Cheung","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00935-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In 2018, Royal College emergency medicine residency programs shifted to a competency-based medical education framework. This study sought to explore the impact of this transition on simulation-based education activities, including the use of simulation for assessment, in emergency medicine programs across Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An interview guide was created by the authors evaluating the current role of simulation in emergency medicine programs based on the Core Components framework of competency-based medical education. Semi-structured interviews of emergency medicine simulation directors across Canada were conducted virtually between May 2022 and December 2022. Descriptive statistics of quantitative data are reported and qualitative responses were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews represented 11/14 (78.5%) emergency medicine programs in Canada. Competency-based medical education national standards were commonly used to identify gaps in training experiences, particularly with high acuity low opportunity scenarios that could be addressed using simulation. Furthermore, competency-based medical education provided a framework where simulation curricula were revised and allowed for mapping of simulation scenarios to specific required training experiences and assessment requirements. All programs reported a new role of assessment in simulation largely in the form of entrustable professional activity assessments to satisfy the requirement of competency-based medical education. However, concerns were raised around the increasing role of assessment and its impact on psychological safety of the simulation learning environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The introduction of competency-based medical education has elevated the role of simulation as a means of assessing learner competencies. This shift has been largely positive, by facilitating resident assessment of required training experiences, but with some possible negative consequences related to the impact of assessments on the psychological safety traditionally afforded by the simulation environment. As such, educators must be intentional in how simulation is used in their program with particular attention given to the validity of assessments and the impact on safety of the learning environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation education in the age of competency-based medical education: a study of the use of simulation-based education in Canadian emergency medicine programs.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Fisk, Andrew K Hall, Michael O'Brien, Warren J Cheung\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43678-025-00935-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In 2018, Royal College emergency medicine residency programs shifted to a competency-based medical education framework. This study sought to explore the impact of this transition on simulation-based education activities, including the use of simulation for assessment, in emergency medicine programs across Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An interview guide was created by the authors evaluating the current role of simulation in emergency medicine programs based on the Core Components framework of competency-based medical education. Semi-structured interviews of emergency medicine simulation directors across Canada were conducted virtually between May 2022 and December 2022. Descriptive statistics of quantitative data are reported and qualitative responses were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews represented 11/14 (78.5%) emergency medicine programs in Canada. Competency-based medical education national standards were commonly used to identify gaps in training experiences, particularly with high acuity low opportunity scenarios that could be addressed using simulation. Furthermore, competency-based medical education provided a framework where simulation curricula were revised and allowed for mapping of simulation scenarios to specific required training experiences and assessment requirements. All programs reported a new role of assessment in simulation largely in the form of entrustable professional activity assessments to satisfy the requirement of competency-based medical education. However, concerns were raised around the increasing role of assessment and its impact on psychological safety of the simulation learning environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The introduction of competency-based medical education has elevated the role of simulation as a means of assessing learner competencies. This shift has been largely positive, by facilitating resident assessment of required training experiences, but with some possible negative consequences related to the impact of assessments on the psychological safety traditionally afforded by the simulation environment. As such, educators must be intentional in how simulation is used in their program with particular attention given to the validity of assessments and the impact on safety of the learning environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJEM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJEM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00935-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00935-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:2018年,皇家学院急诊医学住院医师项目转向以能力为基础的医学教育框架。本研究旨在探讨这种转变对基于模拟的教育活动的影响,包括在加拿大急诊医学项目中使用模拟进行评估。方法:基于能力为本的医学教育核心要素框架,作者制作了一份访谈指南,评估模拟在急诊医学课程中的作用。在2022年5月至2022年12月期间,对加拿大各地的急诊医学模拟主任进行了半结构化访谈。报告了定量数据的描述性统计数据,并使用专题分析对定性反应进行了分析。结果:受访者占加拿大急诊医学项目的11/14(78.5%)。以能力为基础的医学教育国家标准通常用于确定培训经验中的差距,特别是在可通过模拟解决的高敏锐度低机会情况下。此外,以能力为基础的医学教育提供了一个框架,在这个框架中修订了模拟课程,并允许将模拟情景与具体所需的培训经验和评估要求相结合。所有项目都报告了评估在模拟中的新作用,主要以可信赖的专业活动评估的形式来满足以能力为基础的医学教育的要求。然而,越来越多的人关注评估的作用及其对模拟学习环境心理安全的影响。结论:基于能力的医学教育的引入提高了模拟作为评估学习者能力的一种手段的作用。这种转变在很大程度上是积极的,因为它促进了居民对所需培训经验的评估,但也有一些可能的消极后果,因为评估对传统上由模拟环境提供的心理安全的影响。因此,教育工作者必须有意识地在他们的课程中如何使用模拟,特别注意评估的有效性和对学习环境安全的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulation education in the age of competency-based medical education: a study of the use of simulation-based education in Canadian emergency medicine programs.

Objective: In 2018, Royal College emergency medicine residency programs shifted to a competency-based medical education framework. This study sought to explore the impact of this transition on simulation-based education activities, including the use of simulation for assessment, in emergency medicine programs across Canada.

Methods: An interview guide was created by the authors evaluating the current role of simulation in emergency medicine programs based on the Core Components framework of competency-based medical education. Semi-structured interviews of emergency medicine simulation directors across Canada were conducted virtually between May 2022 and December 2022. Descriptive statistics of quantitative data are reported and qualitative responses were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Interviews represented 11/14 (78.5%) emergency medicine programs in Canada. Competency-based medical education national standards were commonly used to identify gaps in training experiences, particularly with high acuity low opportunity scenarios that could be addressed using simulation. Furthermore, competency-based medical education provided a framework where simulation curricula were revised and allowed for mapping of simulation scenarios to specific required training experiences and assessment requirements. All programs reported a new role of assessment in simulation largely in the form of entrustable professional activity assessments to satisfy the requirement of competency-based medical education. However, concerns were raised around the increasing role of assessment and its impact on psychological safety of the simulation learning environment.

Conclusion: The introduction of competency-based medical education has elevated the role of simulation as a means of assessing learner competencies. This shift has been largely positive, by facilitating resident assessment of required training experiences, but with some possible negative consequences related to the impact of assessments on the psychological safety traditionally afforded by the simulation environment. As such, educators must be intentional in how simulation is used in their program with particular attention given to the validity of assessments and the impact on safety of the learning environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信