{"title":"全膝关节置换术中连续内收管阻断使用10 mL 0.15%布比卡因与20 mL 0.25%布比卡因的比较:一项随机非劣效性试验。","authors":"Wirinaree Kampitak, Aree Tanavalee, Srihatach Ngarmukos, Nattanit Wanasrisant, Wanlaya Homsuwan","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Different concentrations and volumes of local anesthetic boluses are used for continuous adductor canal block. We hypothesized that a 10 mL 0.15% bupivacaine bolus would provide non-inferior pain relief to a 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine bolus for continuous adductor canal block as part of comprehensive multimodal analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>140 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were randomly allocated to receive either a 20 mL bolus of 0.25% bupivacaine (20/0.25 bupi group) or a 10 mL bolus of 0.15% bupivacaine (10/0.15 bupi group). Both groups received continuous adductor canal block with 0.15% bupivacaine (5 mL/hour), local infiltration analgesia, and interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee block. The primary outcomes were average knee-pain scores 6 and 12 hours postoperatively; the non-inferiority margin was a score difference of 1. Secondary outcomes included rest and movement pain scores, morphine consumption, and time to first rescue analgesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median knee-pain scores for the 20/0.25 and 10/0.15 bupi groups were 0 (0 to 1) and 0 (0 to 2), respectively, after 6 hours and 2 (1 to 2) and 2 (1 to 3), respectively, after 12 hours. The median treatment difference (10/0.15 bupi ̶ 20/0.25 bupi) was 0 (95% CI -0.45 to 0.45) at both time points, with neither interval exceeding the non-inferiority margin. No clinical differences were observed in secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A 10 mL 0.15% bupivacaine bolus in continuous adductor canal block offers comparable average knee-pain relief 6 and 12 hours after total knee arthroplasty to a 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine bolus.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT06179628.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of 10 mL 0.15% vs 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine boluses for continuous adductor canal block in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized non-inferiority trial.\",\"authors\":\"Wirinaree Kampitak, Aree Tanavalee, Srihatach Ngarmukos, Nattanit Wanasrisant, Wanlaya Homsuwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2025-106587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Different concentrations and volumes of local anesthetic boluses are used for continuous adductor canal block. We hypothesized that a 10 mL 0.15% bupivacaine bolus would provide non-inferior pain relief to a 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine bolus for continuous adductor canal block as part of comprehensive multimodal analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>140 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were randomly allocated to receive either a 20 mL bolus of 0.25% bupivacaine (20/0.25 bupi group) or a 10 mL bolus of 0.15% bupivacaine (10/0.15 bupi group). Both groups received continuous adductor canal block with 0.15% bupivacaine (5 mL/hour), local infiltration analgesia, and interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee block. The primary outcomes were average knee-pain scores 6 and 12 hours postoperatively; the non-inferiority margin was a score difference of 1. Secondary outcomes included rest and movement pain scores, morphine consumption, and time to first rescue analgesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median knee-pain scores for the 20/0.25 and 10/0.15 bupi groups were 0 (0 to 1) and 0 (0 to 2), respectively, after 6 hours and 2 (1 to 2) and 2 (1 to 3), respectively, after 12 hours. The median treatment difference (10/0.15 bupi ̶ 20/0.25 bupi) was 0 (95% CI -0.45 to 0.45) at both time points, with neither interval exceeding the non-inferiority margin. No clinical differences were observed in secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A 10 mL 0.15% bupivacaine bolus in continuous adductor canal block offers comparable average knee-pain relief 6 and 12 hours after total knee arthroplasty to a 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine bolus.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT06179628.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106587\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106587","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:采用不同浓度和体积的局麻丸进行连续内收管阻滞。我们假设,作为综合多模式镇痛的一部分,对于连续内收肌管阻滞,10 mL 0.15%布比卡因丸剂比20 mL 0.25%布比卡因丸剂能提供非亚差性疼痛缓解。方法:将140例全膝关节置换术患者随机分为两组,一组注射0.25%布比卡因20 mL(20/0.25布比比组),另一组注射0.15%布比卡因10 mL(10/0.15布比比组)。两组均采用0.15%布比卡因(5 mL/h)连续内收管阻滞,局部浸润性镇痛,腘动脉与膝囊间间隙阻滞。主要结局是术后6和12小时的平均膝关节疼痛评分;非劣效性差为1分。次要结局包括休息和运动疼痛评分、吗啡用量和首次抢救镇痛时间。结果:20/0.25和10/0.15 bupi组6小时后膝关节疼痛中位评分分别为0(0 ~ 1)和0(0 ~ 2),12小时后膝关节疼痛中位评分分别为2(1 ~ 2)和2(1 ~ 3)。两个时间点的中位治疗差异(10/0.15 bupi - 20/0.25 bupi)为0 (95% CI -0.45至0.45),两个时间点的间隔均未超过非劣效性裕度。在次要结局方面没有观察到临床差异。讨论:在全膝关节置换术后6和12小时内,连续内收管阻断术中10 mL 0.15%布比卡因丸与20 mL 0.25%布比卡因丸的平均膝关节疼痛缓解效果相当。试验注册号:NCT06179628。
Comparison of 10 mL 0.15% vs 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine boluses for continuous adductor canal block in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized non-inferiority trial.
Objectives: Different concentrations and volumes of local anesthetic boluses are used for continuous adductor canal block. We hypothesized that a 10 mL 0.15% bupivacaine bolus would provide non-inferior pain relief to a 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine bolus for continuous adductor canal block as part of comprehensive multimodal analgesia.
Methods: 140 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were randomly allocated to receive either a 20 mL bolus of 0.25% bupivacaine (20/0.25 bupi group) or a 10 mL bolus of 0.15% bupivacaine (10/0.15 bupi group). Both groups received continuous adductor canal block with 0.15% bupivacaine (5 mL/hour), local infiltration analgesia, and interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee block. The primary outcomes were average knee-pain scores 6 and 12 hours postoperatively; the non-inferiority margin was a score difference of 1. Secondary outcomes included rest and movement pain scores, morphine consumption, and time to first rescue analgesia.
Results: The median knee-pain scores for the 20/0.25 and 10/0.15 bupi groups were 0 (0 to 1) and 0 (0 to 2), respectively, after 6 hours and 2 (1 to 2) and 2 (1 to 3), respectively, after 12 hours. The median treatment difference (10/0.15 bupi ̶ 20/0.25 bupi) was 0 (95% CI -0.45 to 0.45) at both time points, with neither interval exceeding the non-inferiority margin. No clinical differences were observed in secondary outcomes.
Discussion: A 10 mL 0.15% bupivacaine bolus in continuous adductor canal block offers comparable average knee-pain relief 6 and 12 hours after total knee arthroplasty to a 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine bolus.
期刊介绍:
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications.
Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).