模拟息肉的倒置结肠憩室:诊断挑战和临床意义的病例报告。

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Suha Sholi, Walla Dawood, Mohammed M H Hajhamad
{"title":"模拟息肉的倒置结肠憩室:诊断挑战和临床意义的病例报告。","authors":"Suha Sholi, Walla Dawood, Mohammed M H Hajhamad","doi":"10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and importance: </strong>Inverted colonic diverticulum (ICD) is a rare intraluminal lesion that typically presents with a polypoid appearance, which can make it challenging to differentiate from colonic polyps. ICDs occur in about 0.7 % to 1.7 % of individuals, with a mean age of 59 years, and a slightly higher prevalence in males.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>This case report presents a 40-year-old male with ICD that was misdiagnosed as polyp after a colonoscopy showed polypoid lesions in the context of diverticulosis and underwent polypectomy, colonoscopy completed. A few hours after the procedure, the patient developed symptoms consistent with complicated diverticulitis and required antibiotic treatment and CT-guided aspiration.</p><p><strong>Clinical discussion: </strong>This case highlights the difficulty in differentiating ICD from colonic polyps during colonoscopy. Although ICDs are benign, they can closely resemble polyps, and misidentifying them may result in unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions. Endoscopists should be aware of the distinctive features of ICDs and employ techniques like probing and air insufflation to avoid unnecessary procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prompt recognition of ICDs can help prevent complications such as colonic perforation and unnecessary surgery, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48113,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports","volume":"131 ","pages":"111389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inverted colonic diverticulum mimicking a polyp: A case report on diagnostic challenges and clinical implications.\",\"authors\":\"Suha Sholi, Walla Dawood, Mohammed M H Hajhamad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and importance: </strong>Inverted colonic diverticulum (ICD) is a rare intraluminal lesion that typically presents with a polypoid appearance, which can make it challenging to differentiate from colonic polyps. ICDs occur in about 0.7 % to 1.7 % of individuals, with a mean age of 59 years, and a slightly higher prevalence in males.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>This case report presents a 40-year-old male with ICD that was misdiagnosed as polyp after a colonoscopy showed polypoid lesions in the context of diverticulosis and underwent polypectomy, colonoscopy completed. A few hours after the procedure, the patient developed symptoms consistent with complicated diverticulitis and required antibiotic treatment and CT-guided aspiration.</p><p><strong>Clinical discussion: </strong>This case highlights the difficulty in differentiating ICD from colonic polyps during colonoscopy. Although ICDs are benign, they can closely resemble polyps, and misidentifying them may result in unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions. Endoscopists should be aware of the distinctive features of ICDs and employ techniques like probing and air insufflation to avoid unnecessary procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prompt recognition of ICDs can help prevent complications such as colonic perforation and unnecessary surgery, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"131 \",\"pages\":\"111389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介及重要性:内翻性结肠憩室(ICD)是一种罕见的腔内病变,通常表现为息肉样样外观,很难与结肠息肉区分。icd的发生率约为0.7%至1.7%,平均年龄为59岁,男性患病率略高。病例报告:本病例报告一例40岁男性ICD患者,在结肠镜检查发现憩室息肉样病变后被误诊为息肉,并行息肉切除术,结肠镜检查完成。手术后几小时,患者出现并发症憩室炎的症状,需要抗生素治疗和ct引导下的抽吸。临床讨论:本病例强调了在结肠镜检查中鉴别ICD与结肠息肉的困难。虽然icd是良性的,但它们可能与息肉非常相似,错误识别它们可能导致不必要的和潜在有害的干预。内窥镜医师应了解icd的独特特征,并采用探查和充气等技术来避免不必要的手术。结论:及时识别icd有助于预防结肠穿孔等并发症和不必要的手术,最终改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inverted colonic diverticulum mimicking a polyp: A case report on diagnostic challenges and clinical implications.

Introduction and importance: Inverted colonic diverticulum (ICD) is a rare intraluminal lesion that typically presents with a polypoid appearance, which can make it challenging to differentiate from colonic polyps. ICDs occur in about 0.7 % to 1.7 % of individuals, with a mean age of 59 years, and a slightly higher prevalence in males.

Case presentation: This case report presents a 40-year-old male with ICD that was misdiagnosed as polyp after a colonoscopy showed polypoid lesions in the context of diverticulosis and underwent polypectomy, colonoscopy completed. A few hours after the procedure, the patient developed symptoms consistent with complicated diverticulitis and required antibiotic treatment and CT-guided aspiration.

Clinical discussion: This case highlights the difficulty in differentiating ICD from colonic polyps during colonoscopy. Although ICDs are benign, they can closely resemble polyps, and misidentifying them may result in unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions. Endoscopists should be aware of the distinctive features of ICDs and employ techniques like probing and air insufflation to avoid unnecessary procedures.

Conclusion: Prompt recognition of ICDs can help prevent complications such as colonic perforation and unnecessary surgery, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1116
审稿时长
46 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信