孤独感干预措施的跨专业合作:范围综述。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70239
Lok Ying Chu, Youjuan Zhang, Graeme Drummond Smith, Ken Hok Man Ho
{"title":"孤独感干预措施的跨专业合作:范围综述。","authors":"Lok Ying Chu, Youjuan Zhang, Graeme Drummond Smith, Ken Hok Man Ho","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe the types and effects of interprofessional collaborations (IPC) interventions, the disciplines involved, the target population and the barriers and facilitators in implementation for tackling loneliness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Following Arksey and O'Mally's framework, two authors screened the title, abstract and full text of the identified studies. Characteristics of included studies and IPC interventions were extracted into tables. The PAGER framework was applied for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Keyword search was conducted on OVID Medline, OVID PsycINFO, OVID Embase, EBSCO CINAHL and ProQuest databases from January 2003 to October 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven eligible articles were included. IPC was generally effective in alleviating loneliness among older adults. Professionals involved students of healthcare professionals, nurses, physicians, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, psychologists, pharmacists, social workers, artists and engineers. IPC interventions were delivered face-to-face or by digital technology. IPC interventions involved social groups, intergenerational support, social skill training, art therapy, home visiting, coordinated care pathways and digital rehabilitation. Both facilitators and barriers to implementing IPC interventions for tackling loneliness were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interprofessional collaboration employing digital technology has been a recent trend for tackling loneliness among older adults. However, the collaborative ways between various disciplines to develop and implement IPC interventions for tackling loneliness were unclear. Nursing demonstrated relatively low engagement in IPC studies for loneliness.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>Nurses should expand their roles in IPC to tackle the psycho-social-spiritual aspects of loneliness. Involving an intergenerational approach is important for older adults.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>There is no systematic mapping and synthesis of information on IPC for tackling loneliness. IPC interventions are generally effective in alleviating loneliness among older adults; however, ways of collaboration between disciplines require further attention. Nurses across a variety of settings in the community can become actively involved in IPC interventions for loneliness.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>PRISMA-ScR. No Patient or Public Contribution. Protocol Registration Number: DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/PJDH2.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"12 5","pages":"e70239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interprofessional Collaborations on Interventions for People With Loneliness: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Lok Ying Chu, Youjuan Zhang, Graeme Drummond Smith, Ken Hok Man Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nop2.70239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe the types and effects of interprofessional collaborations (IPC) interventions, the disciplines involved, the target population and the barriers and facilitators in implementation for tackling loneliness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Following Arksey and O'Mally's framework, two authors screened the title, abstract and full text of the identified studies. Characteristics of included studies and IPC interventions were extracted into tables. The PAGER framework was applied for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Keyword search was conducted on OVID Medline, OVID PsycINFO, OVID Embase, EBSCO CINAHL and ProQuest databases from January 2003 to October 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven eligible articles were included. IPC was generally effective in alleviating loneliness among older adults. Professionals involved students of healthcare professionals, nurses, physicians, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, psychologists, pharmacists, social workers, artists and engineers. IPC interventions were delivered face-to-face or by digital technology. IPC interventions involved social groups, intergenerational support, social skill training, art therapy, home visiting, coordinated care pathways and digital rehabilitation. Both facilitators and barriers to implementing IPC interventions for tackling loneliness were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interprofessional collaboration employing digital technology has been a recent trend for tackling loneliness among older adults. However, the collaborative ways between various disciplines to develop and implement IPC interventions for tackling loneliness were unclear. Nursing demonstrated relatively low engagement in IPC studies for loneliness.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>Nurses should expand their roles in IPC to tackle the psycho-social-spiritual aspects of loneliness. Involving an intergenerational approach is important for older adults.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>There is no systematic mapping and synthesis of information on IPC for tackling loneliness. IPC interventions are generally effective in alleviating loneliness among older adults; however, ways of collaboration between disciplines require further attention. Nurses across a variety of settings in the community can become actively involved in IPC interventions for loneliness.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>PRISMA-ScR. No Patient or Public Contribution. Protocol Registration Number: DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/PJDH2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Open\",\"volume\":\"12 5\",\"pages\":\"e70239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093052/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70239\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述跨专业合作(IPC)干预措施的类型和效果、涉及的学科、目标人群以及实施中应对孤独的障碍和促进因素。设计:范围审查。综述方法:根据Arksey和O'Mally的框架,两位作者筛选了已确定的研究的标题、摘要和全文。纳入研究和IPC干预措施的特征被提取到表格中。采用PAGER框架进行数据分析。数据来源:关键词检索于OVID Medline、OVID PsycINFO、OVID Embase、EBSCO CINAHL和ProQuest数据库,检索时间为2003年1月至2023年10月。结果:纳入11篇符合条件的文章。IPC在缓解老年人孤独感方面普遍有效。专业人员包括保健专业人员的学生、护士、医生、职业治疗师、物理治疗师、心理学家、药剂师、社会工作者、艺术家和工程师。IPC干预措施是面对面或通过数字技术提供的。IPC干预措施涉及社会团体、代际支持、社会技能培训、艺术治疗、家访、协调护理途径和数字康复。确定了实施IPC干预措施以解决孤独感的促进因素和障碍。结论:利用数字技术的跨专业合作已成为解决老年人孤独感的最新趋势。然而,各学科之间开发和实施IPC干预措施以解决孤独感的合作方式尚不清楚。护理在IPC孤独感研究中表现出相对较低的参与度。对职业和/或患者护理的影响:护士应扩大其在IPC中的作用,以解决孤独感的心理-社会-精神方面的问题。对老年人来说,采用代际方法很重要。影响:没有系统地绘制和综合IPC应对孤独的信息。IPC干预措施通常对减轻老年人的孤独感有效;然而,学科之间的合作方式需要进一步关注。社区中各种环境中的护士都可以积极参与针对孤独的IPC干预措施。报告方法:PRISMA-ScR。没有病人或公众捐款。协议注册号:DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/PJDH2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Interprofessional Collaborations on Interventions for People With Loneliness: A Scoping Review.

Interprofessional Collaborations on Interventions for People With Loneliness: A Scoping Review.

Aim: To describe the types and effects of interprofessional collaborations (IPC) interventions, the disciplines involved, the target population and the barriers and facilitators in implementation for tackling loneliness.

Design: Scoping review.

Review methods: Following Arksey and O'Mally's framework, two authors screened the title, abstract and full text of the identified studies. Characteristics of included studies and IPC interventions were extracted into tables. The PAGER framework was applied for data analysis.

Data sources: Keyword search was conducted on OVID Medline, OVID PsycINFO, OVID Embase, EBSCO CINAHL and ProQuest databases from January 2003 to October 2023.

Results: Eleven eligible articles were included. IPC was generally effective in alleviating loneliness among older adults. Professionals involved students of healthcare professionals, nurses, physicians, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, psychologists, pharmacists, social workers, artists and engineers. IPC interventions were delivered face-to-face or by digital technology. IPC interventions involved social groups, intergenerational support, social skill training, art therapy, home visiting, coordinated care pathways and digital rehabilitation. Both facilitators and barriers to implementing IPC interventions for tackling loneliness were identified.

Conclusion: Interprofessional collaboration employing digital technology has been a recent trend for tackling loneliness among older adults. However, the collaborative ways between various disciplines to develop and implement IPC interventions for tackling loneliness were unclear. Nursing demonstrated relatively low engagement in IPC studies for loneliness.

Implications for the profession and/or patient care: Nurses should expand their roles in IPC to tackle the psycho-social-spiritual aspects of loneliness. Involving an intergenerational approach is important for older adults.

Impact: There is no systematic mapping and synthesis of information on IPC for tackling loneliness. IPC interventions are generally effective in alleviating loneliness among older adults; however, ways of collaboration between disciplines require further attention. Nurses across a variety of settings in the community can become actively involved in IPC interventions for loneliness.

Reporting method: PRISMA-ScR. No Patient or Public Contribution. Protocol Registration Number: DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/PJDH2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信