腋窝弓变异解剖在乳腺MRI上的流行及对腋窝淋巴结评估的影响。

IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Anne Elizabeth Kendell, Samantha Yost, Kristie Yang, Megan Mills, Nicole Winkler
{"title":"腋窝弓变异解剖在乳腺MRI上的流行及对腋窝淋巴结评估的影响。","authors":"Anne Elizabeth Kendell, Samantha Yost, Kristie Yang, Megan Mills, Nicole Winkler","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the prevalence of the axillary arch (AA) variant and its impact on the sensitivity of US vs MRI for detecting axillary nodal metastases in patients with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IRB waved informed consent for this retrospective study. Three hundred, eighty-two breast MRIs performed for the extent of disease of breast cancer between 2012 and 2023 were reviewed for the presence of AA. Pre-MRI axillary US was available in 322 of these cases. The presence of axillary adenopathy was documented and correlated with pathology. A paired sample comparison was used to calculate sensitivities of US and MRI for detection of the AA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AA was detected on breast MRI in 6.8% (26/382) of patients. Of these, 30.8% (8/26) were bilateral, 50% (13/26) were unilateral left, and 19.2% (5/26) were unilateral right. All had lymph nodes both superficial and deep to the AA. Of the 26 patients with AA, 19 patients underwent pre-MRI axillary US. Biopsy-proven malignant adenopathy was detected on MRI but missed on US in 10.5% (2/19) of patients with AA but only 2.5% (7/279) of patients without AA. Sensitivity for detection of lymphadenopathy on MRI and US was 69.7% (82/122)% and 67.5% (77/114) for all patients (P = .17), 72.2% (78/108) and 68.5% (74/108) for patients without AA (P = .21), and 66.2% (4/6) and 50.0% (3/6) for patients with AA. The small sample size of patients with AA precluded statistical comparison.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AA is a common variant detectable on breast MRI. Axillary nodal metastases may reduce US sensitivity for identifying nodal metastases. Further investigation is required to establish statistical significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Axillary Arch Variant Anatomy on Breast MRI and Impact on Axillary Lymph Node Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Elizabeth Kendell, Samantha Yost, Kristie Yang, Megan Mills, Nicole Winkler\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbi/wbaf023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the prevalence of the axillary arch (AA) variant and its impact on the sensitivity of US vs MRI for detecting axillary nodal metastases in patients with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IRB waved informed consent for this retrospective study. Three hundred, eighty-two breast MRIs performed for the extent of disease of breast cancer between 2012 and 2023 were reviewed for the presence of AA. Pre-MRI axillary US was available in 322 of these cases. The presence of axillary adenopathy was documented and correlated with pathology. A paired sample comparison was used to calculate sensitivities of US and MRI for detection of the AA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AA was detected on breast MRI in 6.8% (26/382) of patients. Of these, 30.8% (8/26) were bilateral, 50% (13/26) were unilateral left, and 19.2% (5/26) were unilateral right. All had lymph nodes both superficial and deep to the AA. Of the 26 patients with AA, 19 patients underwent pre-MRI axillary US. Biopsy-proven malignant adenopathy was detected on MRI but missed on US in 10.5% (2/19) of patients with AA but only 2.5% (7/279) of patients without AA. Sensitivity for detection of lymphadenopathy on MRI and US was 69.7% (82/122)% and 67.5% (77/114) for all patients (P = .17), 72.2% (78/108) and 68.5% (74/108) for patients without AA (P = .21), and 66.2% (4/6) and 50.0% (3/6) for patients with AA. The small sample size of patients with AA precluded statistical comparison.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AA is a common variant detectable on breast MRI. Axillary nodal metastases may reduce US sensitivity for identifying nodal metastases. Further investigation is required to establish statistical significance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Breast Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Breast Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨腋窝弓(axillary arch, AA)变异的患病率及其对乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结转移的US和MRI检测敏感性的影响。方法:IRB对这项回顾性研究表示知情同意。回顾了2012年至2023年期间进行的382例乳腺癌疾病程度的乳房mri,以确定AA的存在。其中322例进行了mri前腋窝超声检查。腋窝腺病的存在被记录并与病理相关。采用配对样本比较计算US和MRI检测AA的灵敏度。结果:乳腺MRI检出AA的比例为6.8%(26/382)。其中,30.8%(8/26)为双侧,50%(13/26)为单侧左侧,19.2%(5/26)为单侧右侧。所有人都有淋巴结,有浅表淋巴结,也有深淋巴结。在26例AA患者中,19例患者行mri前腋窝超声检查。10.5%的AA患者(2/19)在MRI上发现活检证实的恶性腺病,但在US上未发现,而在非AA患者中,这一比例仅为2.5%(7/279)。MRI和US对所有患者淋巴结病变的敏感度分别为69.7%(82/122)%和67.5% (77/114)(P = 0.17),对无AA患者的敏感度分别为72.2%(78/108)和68.5% (74/108)(P = 0.21),对AA患者的敏感度分别为66.2%(4/6)和50.0%(3/6)。AA患者的小样本量妨碍了统计比较。结论:AA是乳腺MRI可检出的常见变异。腋窝淋巴结转移可能会降低美国鉴别淋巴结转移的敏感性。需要进一步调查以确定统计显著性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of Axillary Arch Variant Anatomy on Breast MRI and Impact on Axillary Lymph Node Assessment.

Objective: To assess the prevalence of the axillary arch (AA) variant and its impact on the sensitivity of US vs MRI for detecting axillary nodal metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Methods: The IRB waved informed consent for this retrospective study. Three hundred, eighty-two breast MRIs performed for the extent of disease of breast cancer between 2012 and 2023 were reviewed for the presence of AA. Pre-MRI axillary US was available in 322 of these cases. The presence of axillary adenopathy was documented and correlated with pathology. A paired sample comparison was used to calculate sensitivities of US and MRI for detection of the AA.

Results: The AA was detected on breast MRI in 6.8% (26/382) of patients. Of these, 30.8% (8/26) were bilateral, 50% (13/26) were unilateral left, and 19.2% (5/26) were unilateral right. All had lymph nodes both superficial and deep to the AA. Of the 26 patients with AA, 19 patients underwent pre-MRI axillary US. Biopsy-proven malignant adenopathy was detected on MRI but missed on US in 10.5% (2/19) of patients with AA but only 2.5% (7/279) of patients without AA. Sensitivity for detection of lymphadenopathy on MRI and US was 69.7% (82/122)% and 67.5% (77/114) for all patients (P = .17), 72.2% (78/108) and 68.5% (74/108) for patients without AA (P = .21), and 66.2% (4/6) and 50.0% (3/6) for patients with AA. The small sample size of patients with AA precluded statistical comparison.

Conclusion: The AA is a common variant detectable on breast MRI. Axillary nodal metastases may reduce US sensitivity for identifying nodal metastases. Further investigation is required to establish statistical significance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
81
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信