精神科监护下拘留的预测因素和结果。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Psychiatric services Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20240503
David Weir, Conan Brady, Art Malone, Declan M McLoughlin
{"title":"精神科监护下拘留的预测因素和结果。","authors":"David Weir, Conan Brady, Art Malone, Declan M McLoughlin","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to characterize the use of emergency psychiatric holding powers in Ireland, investigate predictors of their initiation, and describe clinical outcomes among patients subject to holds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case-control study characterized and compared all voluntarily admitted patients who were either detained under holding powers (N=167 cases involving 162 unique patients) or not subject to holding powers (N=334 control patients) during a stay in one of two psychiatric hospitals in Dublin (January 2018-December 2020). These groups were examined from admission through 1 year after discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of holding powers was rare (2% of voluntary admissions during the study). Patients in both groups were similar, with no significant sociodemographic differences. The case group was rated as having more severe illness at admission (p<0.001). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that detention was more likely in the presence of impaired insight (OR=4.14), psychotic symptoms (OR=7.56), and suicidal ideation (OR=2.58) at admission and with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder (OR=2.50). Mean length of stay was longer for case group (vs. control group) patients (81.37 vs. 45.74 days, z=-7.42, p<0.001), but illness improvement ratings at discharge did not significantly differ between the groups, nor did readmission rates for the year after discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Voluntarily admitted patients who became subject to holding powers had more severe illness at admission than did those without holds. The likelihood of experiencing detention increased with impaired insight, psychotic symptoms, and suicidal ideation at admission. However, the results suggested that treatment outcomes for both groups were similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"741-747"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors and Outcomes of Detention Under Psychiatric Holding Powers.\",\"authors\":\"David Weir, Conan Brady, Art Malone, Declan M McLoughlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.ps.20240503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to characterize the use of emergency psychiatric holding powers in Ireland, investigate predictors of their initiation, and describe clinical outcomes among patients subject to holds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case-control study characterized and compared all voluntarily admitted patients who were either detained under holding powers (N=167 cases involving 162 unique patients) or not subject to holding powers (N=334 control patients) during a stay in one of two psychiatric hospitals in Dublin (January 2018-December 2020). These groups were examined from admission through 1 year after discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of holding powers was rare (2% of voluntary admissions during the study). Patients in both groups were similar, with no significant sociodemographic differences. The case group was rated as having more severe illness at admission (p<0.001). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that detention was more likely in the presence of impaired insight (OR=4.14), psychotic symptoms (OR=7.56), and suicidal ideation (OR=2.58) at admission and with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder (OR=2.50). Mean length of stay was longer for case group (vs. control group) patients (81.37 vs. 45.74 days, z=-7.42, p<0.001), but illness improvement ratings at discharge did not significantly differ between the groups, nor did readmission rates for the year after discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Voluntarily admitted patients who became subject to holding powers had more severe illness at admission than did those without holds. The likelihood of experiencing detention increased with impaired insight, psychotic symptoms, and suicidal ideation at admission. However, the results suggested that treatment outcomes for both groups were similar.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric services\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"741-747\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240503\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240503","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在描述爱尔兰紧急精神病学拘留权的使用特征,调查其开始的预测因素,并描述拘留患者的临床结果。方法:本回顾性病例对照研究对2018年1月至2020年12月在都柏林两家精神病院之一住院期间自愿入院的被拘留的患者(N=167例,涉及162例独特患者)和未被拘留的患者(N=334例对照患者)进行了特征和比较。这些组从入院到出院后1年进行检查。结果:握力的使用是罕见的(2%的自愿入院研究期间)。两组患者相似,无显著的社会人口统计学差异。病例组在入院时被评为病情更严重(p结论:自愿入院的患者在入院时受到控制的权力比没有控制的患者更严重。在入院时,随着洞察力受损、精神病症状和自杀意念,经历拘留的可能性增加。然而,结果表明两组的治疗结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors and Outcomes of Detention Under Psychiatric Holding Powers.

Objective: This study aimed to characterize the use of emergency psychiatric holding powers in Ireland, investigate predictors of their initiation, and describe clinical outcomes among patients subject to holds.

Methods: This retrospective case-control study characterized and compared all voluntarily admitted patients who were either detained under holding powers (N=167 cases involving 162 unique patients) or not subject to holding powers (N=334 control patients) during a stay in one of two psychiatric hospitals in Dublin (January 2018-December 2020). These groups were examined from admission through 1 year after discharge.

Results: The use of holding powers was rare (2% of voluntary admissions during the study). Patients in both groups were similar, with no significant sociodemographic differences. The case group was rated as having more severe illness at admission (p<0.001). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that detention was more likely in the presence of impaired insight (OR=4.14), psychotic symptoms (OR=7.56), and suicidal ideation (OR=2.58) at admission and with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder (OR=2.50). Mean length of stay was longer for case group (vs. control group) patients (81.37 vs. 45.74 days, z=-7.42, p<0.001), but illness improvement ratings at discharge did not significantly differ between the groups, nor did readmission rates for the year after discharge.

Conclusions: Voluntarily admitted patients who became subject to holding powers had more severe illness at admission than did those without holds. The likelihood of experiencing detention increased with impaired insight, psychotic symptoms, and suicidal ideation at admission. However, the results suggested that treatment outcomes for both groups were similar.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatric services
Psychiatric services 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
295
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信