从Natalizumab切换到Alemtuzumab的患者病程:一项意大利多中心、前瞻性观察研究

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Simona Malucchi, Paola Perini, Francesca Rinaldi, Marta Radaelli, Maria Malentacchi, Antonio Bertolotto, Alessia Di Sapio
{"title":"从Natalizumab切换到Alemtuzumab的患者病程:一项意大利多中心、前瞻性观察研究","authors":"Simona Malucchi, Paola Perini, Francesca Rinaldi, Marta Radaelli, Maria Malentacchi, Antonio Bertolotto, Alessia Di Sapio","doi":"10.1007/s40120-025-00754-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Natalizumab is a highly efficacious therapy (HET) for patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Its prolonged use is limited by the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in patients positive for anti-JCV antibodies. Aims of this work were to evaluate clinical and radiological efficacy at 6 and 12 months after alemtuzumab infusion in patients switching from natalizumab and the safety of this exit strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This real-world, prospective, multicentric, observational study was conducted in three Italian MS centers and included a total of 35 patients with RRMS. Natalizumab treatment occurred from October 2010 to April 2021, whereas switch to alemtuzumab occurred from February 2018 to January 2023. Median washout period between the two drugs was 2 months. Patients underwent brain MRI before alemtuzumab start and then 6 and 12 months after the first alemtuzumab cycle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No clinical relapse occurred during the washout period, nor between the first and second alemtuzumab infusion. Radiological activity was present in 4/35 (11%) and 2/35 (6%) patients, respectively, at 6 and 12 months after the first alemtuzumab administration. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) increase developed in 4/35 (11%) and 5/35 patients (14%), respectively, at 6 and 12 months. No PML occurred, nor any serious adverse event. For patients in center 1 (17 patients), follow-up continued for a median of 3.5 years; NEDA-3 (No Evidence of Disease Activity) was present in 14/17 patients (82%) at the end of follow-up. Autoimmunity occurred in 23% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Alemtuzumab is a valid exit strategy after natalizumab interruption.</p>","PeriodicalId":19216,"journal":{"name":"Neurology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disease Course in Patients Switched from Natalizumab to Alemtuzumab: An Italian Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Simona Malucchi, Paola Perini, Francesca Rinaldi, Marta Radaelli, Maria Malentacchi, Antonio Bertolotto, Alessia Di Sapio\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40120-025-00754-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Natalizumab is a highly efficacious therapy (HET) for patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Its prolonged use is limited by the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in patients positive for anti-JCV antibodies. Aims of this work were to evaluate clinical and radiological efficacy at 6 and 12 months after alemtuzumab infusion in patients switching from natalizumab and the safety of this exit strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This real-world, prospective, multicentric, observational study was conducted in three Italian MS centers and included a total of 35 patients with RRMS. Natalizumab treatment occurred from October 2010 to April 2021, whereas switch to alemtuzumab occurred from February 2018 to January 2023. Median washout period between the two drugs was 2 months. Patients underwent brain MRI before alemtuzumab start and then 6 and 12 months after the first alemtuzumab cycle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No clinical relapse occurred during the washout period, nor between the first and second alemtuzumab infusion. Radiological activity was present in 4/35 (11%) and 2/35 (6%) patients, respectively, at 6 and 12 months after the first alemtuzumab administration. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) increase developed in 4/35 (11%) and 5/35 patients (14%), respectively, at 6 and 12 months. No PML occurred, nor any serious adverse event. For patients in center 1 (17 patients), follow-up continued for a median of 3.5 years; NEDA-3 (No Evidence of Disease Activity) was present in 14/17 patients (82%) at the end of follow-up. Autoimmunity occurred in 23% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Alemtuzumab is a valid exit strategy after natalizumab interruption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-025-00754-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-025-00754-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Natalizumab是一种治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)的高效疗法(HET)。抗jcv抗体阳性的患者发生进行性多灶性白质脑病(PML)的风险限制了其长期使用。这项工作的目的是评估阿仑单抗输注后6个月和12个月的临床和放射学疗效,以及这种退出策略的安全性。方法:这项现实世界、前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究在三个意大利多发性硬化症中心进行,共纳入35例RRMS患者。Natalizumab的治疗时间为2010年10月至2021年4月,而改用阿仑单抗的时间为2018年2月至2023年1月。两种药物的中位洗脱期为2个月。患者在阿仑妥珠单抗开始前以及第一个阿仑妥珠单抗周期后的6个月和12个月分别接受脑MRI检查。结果:洗脱期、第一次和第二次阿仑单抗输注期间均未发生临床复发。在首次阿仑单抗给药后6个月和12个月,分别有4/35(11%)和2/35(6%)患者出现放射活性。在6个月和12个月时,4/35(11%)和5/35(14%)患者的扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)增加。无PML发生,无严重不良事件发生。对于中心1的患者(17例),随访时间中位数为3.5年;随访结束时,14/17例(82%)患者出现NEDA-3(无疾病活动证据)。23%的患者发生自身免疫。结论:Alemtuzumab是natalizumab中断后有效的退出策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disease Course in Patients Switched from Natalizumab to Alemtuzumab: An Italian Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study.

Introduction: Natalizumab is a highly efficacious therapy (HET) for patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Its prolonged use is limited by the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in patients positive for anti-JCV antibodies. Aims of this work were to evaluate clinical and radiological efficacy at 6 and 12 months after alemtuzumab infusion in patients switching from natalizumab and the safety of this exit strategy.

Methods: This real-world, prospective, multicentric, observational study was conducted in three Italian MS centers and included a total of 35 patients with RRMS. Natalizumab treatment occurred from October 2010 to April 2021, whereas switch to alemtuzumab occurred from February 2018 to January 2023. Median washout period between the two drugs was 2 months. Patients underwent brain MRI before alemtuzumab start and then 6 and 12 months after the first alemtuzumab cycle.

Results: No clinical relapse occurred during the washout period, nor between the first and second alemtuzumab infusion. Radiological activity was present in 4/35 (11%) and 2/35 (6%) patients, respectively, at 6 and 12 months after the first alemtuzumab administration. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) increase developed in 4/35 (11%) and 5/35 patients (14%), respectively, at 6 and 12 months. No PML occurred, nor any serious adverse event. For patients in center 1 (17 patients), follow-up continued for a median of 3.5 years; NEDA-3 (No Evidence of Disease Activity) was present in 14/17 patients (82%) at the end of follow-up. Autoimmunity occurred in 23% of patients.

Conclusions: Alemtuzumab is a valid exit strategy after natalizumab interruption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology and Therapy
Neurology and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope Neurology and Therapy aims to provide reliable and inclusive, rapid publication for all therapy related research for neurological indications, supporting the timely dissemination of research with a global reach, to help advance scientific discovery and support clinical practice. Neurology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of neurological and psychiatric therapies, (also covering surgery and devices). Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also welcomed. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial designs, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Neurology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research. Rapid Publication The journal’s rapid publication timelines aim for a peer review decision within 2 weeks of submission. If an article is accepted, it will be published online 3-4 weeks from acceptance. These rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who closely manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with rapid peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model, this allows for the rapid and efficient communication of the latest research and reviews to support scientific discovery and clinical practice. Open Access All articles published by Neurology and Therapy are open access. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning that authors will always have a personal point of contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. We also encourage pre-submission enquiries and are always happy to provide a confidential assessment of manuscripts. Digital Features and Plain Language Summaries Neurology and Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. For examples of digital features please visit our showcase page https://springerhealthcare.com/expertise/publishing-digital-features/ Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of €5250/$6000/£4300. The journal will consider fee discounts and waivers for developing countries and this is decided on a case-by-case basis. Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviews conflict, an Editorial Board Member will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed. Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised, it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case-by-case basis and should be sent to the journal editor, and authors are welcome to make rebuttals against individual reviewer comments, if appropriate. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors'' or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Please see here for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Copyright Neurology and Therapy is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0. Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact managing editor Lydia Alborn at lydia.alborn@springer.com.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信