肿瘤口才和可切除性的术前评估:一项国际调查。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Emma Rammeloo, Jacob S Young, Joost W Schouten, Eelke M Bos, Shawn L Hervey-Jumper, Christine Jungk, Sandro M Krieg, Timothy Smith, Jordina Rincon-Torroella, Chetan Bettegowda, Takashi Maruyama, Arthur Wagner, Philippe Schucht, Marike L D Broekman, Steven De Vleeschouwer, Brian V Nahed, Mitchel S Berger, Arnaud J P E Vincent, Jasper K W Gerritsen
{"title":"肿瘤口才和可切除性的术前评估:一项国际调查。","authors":"Emma Rammeloo, Jacob S Young, Joost W Schouten, Eelke M Bos, Shawn L Hervey-Jumper, Christine Jungk, Sandro M Krieg, Timothy Smith, Jordina Rincon-Torroella, Chetan Bettegowda, Takashi Maruyama, Arthur Wagner, Philippe Schucht, Marike L D Broekman, Steven De Vleeschouwer, Brian V Nahed, Mitchel S Berger, Arnaud J P E Vincent, Jasper K W Gerritsen","doi":"10.1007/s11060-025-05067-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Tumor location and its proximity to eloquent brain areas are key factors in glioma surgery decision-making. However, the absence of a consensus definition for eloquent brain areas leads to variability in surgical decision-making. This survey aimed to assess this heterogeneity in defining eloquent brain regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was distributed among neurosurgeons in the United States, Europe, Latin America, and Australasia between February and November 2023. Respondents rated the eloquence of various brain structures on a Likert scale and reported their use of preoperative techniques. Twelve glioma and glioblastoma cases were presented to assess opinions on tumor location eloquence and preferred surgical approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>157 neurosurgeons from 25 countries responded to the survey. Two-thirds (68%) agreed on the need for a standardized definition of eloquence, while only 23% applied existing eloquence grading scales. Eloquence ratings varied, with the highest variation reported for the corona radiata, uncinate fasciculus and superior longitudinal fasciculus. In patient cases, variability was observed at four levels of decision-making: (1) degree of eloquence; (2) preferred surgical modality; (3) use of intraoperative mapping; (4) the preferred mapping modality (asleep or awake).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey highlights the variability in defining eloquence and its impact on glioma surgery decision-making. This lack of consensus limits the reliability of eloquence as a descriptor of tumor location, affecting patient care and comparability across studies. Future research should focus on the development of an easy-to-use, objective method (based on intraoperative data) for identifying eloquent brain regions preoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative assessment of tumor eloquence and resectability: an international survey.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Rammeloo, Jacob S Young, Joost W Schouten, Eelke M Bos, Shawn L Hervey-Jumper, Christine Jungk, Sandro M Krieg, Timothy Smith, Jordina Rincon-Torroella, Chetan Bettegowda, Takashi Maruyama, Arthur Wagner, Philippe Schucht, Marike L D Broekman, Steven De Vleeschouwer, Brian V Nahed, Mitchel S Berger, Arnaud J P E Vincent, Jasper K W Gerritsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11060-025-05067-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Tumor location and its proximity to eloquent brain areas are key factors in glioma surgery decision-making. However, the absence of a consensus definition for eloquent brain areas leads to variability in surgical decision-making. This survey aimed to assess this heterogeneity in defining eloquent brain regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was distributed among neurosurgeons in the United States, Europe, Latin America, and Australasia between February and November 2023. Respondents rated the eloquence of various brain structures on a Likert scale and reported their use of preoperative techniques. Twelve glioma and glioblastoma cases were presented to assess opinions on tumor location eloquence and preferred surgical approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>157 neurosurgeons from 25 countries responded to the survey. Two-thirds (68%) agreed on the need for a standardized definition of eloquence, while only 23% applied existing eloquence grading scales. Eloquence ratings varied, with the highest variation reported for the corona radiata, uncinate fasciculus and superior longitudinal fasciculus. In patient cases, variability was observed at four levels of decision-making: (1) degree of eloquence; (2) preferred surgical modality; (3) use of intraoperative mapping; (4) the preferred mapping modality (asleep or awake).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey highlights the variability in defining eloquence and its impact on glioma surgery decision-making. This lack of consensus limits the reliability of eloquence as a descriptor of tumor location, affecting patient care and comparability across studies. Future research should focus on the development of an easy-to-use, objective method (based on intraoperative data) for identifying eloquent brain regions preoperatively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-05067-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-05067-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:肿瘤的位置及其与脑功能区的接近程度是胶质瘤手术决策的关键因素。然而,缺乏对雄辩脑区的共识定义导致手术决策的可变性。这项调查旨在评估在定义雄辩脑区域时的这种异质性。方法:于2023年2 - 11月对美国、欧洲、拉丁美洲和大洋洲的神经外科医生进行调查。受访者在李克特量表上评价了各种大脑结构的口才,并报告了他们使用术前技术的情况。本文报告了12例胶质瘤和胶质母细胞瘤的病例,以评估肿瘤的位置、位置和手术入路的选择。结果:来自25个国家的157名神经外科医生参与了调查。三分之二(68%)的人同意需要对口才进行标准化定义,而只有23%的人采用现有的口才分级量表。口才评分各不相同,辐射冠、钩状束和上纵束的变化最大。在患者案例中,在四个决策水平上观察到变异性:(1)口才程度;(2)首选手术方式;(3)术中测绘的使用;(4)首选映射模式(睡眠或清醒)。结论:本调查突出了口才定义的可变性及其对胶质瘤手术决策的影响。这种缺乏共识限制了雄辩作为肿瘤位置描述的可靠性,影响了患者护理和研究之间的可比性。未来的研究应侧重于开发一种易于使用的、客观的方法(基于术中数据),以在手术前识别有用的大脑区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative assessment of tumor eloquence and resectability: an international survey.

Background and objectives: Tumor location and its proximity to eloquent brain areas are key factors in glioma surgery decision-making. However, the absence of a consensus definition for eloquent brain areas leads to variability in surgical decision-making. This survey aimed to assess this heterogeneity in defining eloquent brain regions.

Methods: A survey was distributed among neurosurgeons in the United States, Europe, Latin America, and Australasia between February and November 2023. Respondents rated the eloquence of various brain structures on a Likert scale and reported their use of preoperative techniques. Twelve glioma and glioblastoma cases were presented to assess opinions on tumor location eloquence and preferred surgical approaches.

Results: 157 neurosurgeons from 25 countries responded to the survey. Two-thirds (68%) agreed on the need for a standardized definition of eloquence, while only 23% applied existing eloquence grading scales. Eloquence ratings varied, with the highest variation reported for the corona radiata, uncinate fasciculus and superior longitudinal fasciculus. In patient cases, variability was observed at four levels of decision-making: (1) degree of eloquence; (2) preferred surgical modality; (3) use of intraoperative mapping; (4) the preferred mapping modality (asleep or awake).

Conclusions: This survey highlights the variability in defining eloquence and its impact on glioma surgery decision-making. This lack of consensus limits the reliability of eloquence as a descriptor of tumor location, affecting patient care and comparability across studies. Future research should focus on the development of an easy-to-use, objective method (based on intraoperative data) for identifying eloquent brain regions preoperatively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信