脊骨按摩对接受腰痛治疗的退伍军人健康管理局患者阿片类药物处方的影响。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anthony J Lisi, Lori A Bastian, Cynthia A Brandt, Brian C Coleman, Brenda Fenton, Joseph T King, Joseph L Goulet
{"title":"脊骨按摩对接受腰痛治疗的退伍军人健康管理局患者阿片类药物处方的影响。","authors":"Anthony J Lisi, Lori A Bastian, Cynthia A Brandt, Brian C Coleman, Brenda Fenton, Joseph T King, Joseph L Goulet","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09556-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Key nonpharmacologic therapies, including those routinely provided by chiropractors, are recommended first-line treatments for low back pain (LBP). Little is known on whether such care provided in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) has a downstream effect on the use of other healthcare services, including opioid prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of chiropractic care on receipt of opioid prescriptions within 365 days of an incident primary care provider (PCP) visit for LBP among opioid-naïve VA patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis with longitudinal follow-up.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients had an LBP visit with a VA PCP between 10/1/2015 and 9/30/2020, without any VA LBP visit in the preceding 18 months, and then 2 subsequent VA LBP visits in the following 12 months.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>VA electronic health record data including outpatient visits, prescriptions, and comorbid diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>A total of 128,377 patients met study criteria. The hazard ratio for opioid prescription in a propensity-matched sample was 0.77 (95% CI 0.71-0.83), indicating a significantly lower risk for receipt of an opioid prescription among chiropractic care users in the 365-day follow-up adjusting for potential confounders. The cumulative incidence of opioid prescriptions was 13.0% for chiropractic care users and 16.8% for non-users and the number needed to treat was 27.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study show that nonpharmacologic chiropractic care can be an important component of opioid sparing strategies for VHA patients with LBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Chiropractic Care on Opioid Prescriptions in Veterans Health Administration Patients Receiving Low Back Pain Care.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony J Lisi, Lori A Bastian, Cynthia A Brandt, Brian C Coleman, Brenda Fenton, Joseph T King, Joseph L Goulet\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-025-09556-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Key nonpharmacologic therapies, including those routinely provided by chiropractors, are recommended first-line treatments for low back pain (LBP). Little is known on whether such care provided in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) has a downstream effect on the use of other healthcare services, including opioid prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of chiropractic care on receipt of opioid prescriptions within 365 days of an incident primary care provider (PCP) visit for LBP among opioid-naïve VA patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis with longitudinal follow-up.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients had an LBP visit with a VA PCP between 10/1/2015 and 9/30/2020, without any VA LBP visit in the preceding 18 months, and then 2 subsequent VA LBP visits in the following 12 months.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>VA electronic health record data including outpatient visits, prescriptions, and comorbid diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>A total of 128,377 patients met study criteria. The hazard ratio for opioid prescription in a propensity-matched sample was 0.77 (95% CI 0.71-0.83), indicating a significantly lower risk for receipt of an opioid prescription among chiropractic care users in the 365-day follow-up adjusting for potential confounders. The cumulative incidence of opioid prescriptions was 13.0% for chiropractic care users and 16.8% for non-users and the number needed to treat was 27.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study show that nonpharmacologic chiropractic care can be an important component of opioid sparing strategies for VHA patients with LBP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09556-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09556-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:主要的非药物治疗,包括脊医常规提供的治疗,是腰痛(LBP)的首选治疗方法。对于退伍军人健康管理局(VA)提供的此类护理是否对其他医疗服务的使用(包括阿片类药物处方)有下游影响,人们知之甚少。目的:评估在opioid-naïve VA患者的LBP事件初级保健提供者(PCP)就诊后365天内脊椎按摩护理对阿片类药物处方的影响。设计:纵向随访的横断面分析。参与者:患者在2015年10月1日至2020年9月30日期间与VA PCP进行了一次LBP就诊,在之前的18个月内没有任何VA LBP就诊,然后在接下来的12个月内进行了2次VA LBP就诊。主要测量:VA电子健康记录数据,包括门诊就诊、处方和合并症诊断。主要结果:128,377例患者符合研究标准。倾向匹配样本中阿片类药物处方的风险比为0.77 (95% CI 0.71-0.83),表明在365天的随访中调整潜在混杂因素后,脊椎指压治疗使用者接受阿片类药物处方的风险显著降低。阿片类药物处方的累积发生率在脊椎指压疗法使用者中为13.0%,在非使用者中为16.8%,需要治疗的人数为27人。结论:本研究结果表明,非药物捏脊治疗可以成为VHA合并LBP患者阿片类药物节约策略的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Chiropractic Care on Opioid Prescriptions in Veterans Health Administration Patients Receiving Low Back Pain Care.

Background: Key nonpharmacologic therapies, including those routinely provided by chiropractors, are recommended first-line treatments for low back pain (LBP). Little is known on whether such care provided in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) has a downstream effect on the use of other healthcare services, including opioid prescriptions.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of chiropractic care on receipt of opioid prescriptions within 365 days of an incident primary care provider (PCP) visit for LBP among opioid-naïve VA patients.

Design: Cross-sectional analysis with longitudinal follow-up.

Participants: Patients had an LBP visit with a VA PCP between 10/1/2015 and 9/30/2020, without any VA LBP visit in the preceding 18 months, and then 2 subsequent VA LBP visits in the following 12 months.

Main measures: VA electronic health record data including outpatient visits, prescriptions, and comorbid diagnoses.

Key results: A total of 128,377 patients met study criteria. The hazard ratio for opioid prescription in a propensity-matched sample was 0.77 (95% CI 0.71-0.83), indicating a significantly lower risk for receipt of an opioid prescription among chiropractic care users in the 365-day follow-up adjusting for potential confounders. The cumulative incidence of opioid prescriptions was 13.0% for chiropractic care users and 16.8% for non-users and the number needed to treat was 27.

Conclusions: The results of this study show that nonpharmacologic chiropractic care can be an important component of opioid sparing strategies for VHA patients with LBP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信