退伍军人健康管理局早期实施区域远程医疗应急人员配备计划和初级保健质量:来自临床资源中心计划的证据。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Chelle L Wheat, Sara E Kath, Karin M Nelson, Idamay Curtis, Ashok Reddy
{"title":"退伍军人健康管理局早期实施区域远程医疗应急人员配备计划和初级保健质量:来自临床资源中心计划的证据。","authors":"Chelle L Wheat, Sara E Kath, Karin M Nelson, Idamay Curtis, Ashok Reddy","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09615-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) launched the Clinical Resource Hub (CRH) program to address primary care staffing deficits and improve access.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if the quality of primary care at clinics that use CRH services was similar to that of clinics that did not. Secondarily, to examine this association for clinics that serve a high proportion of minority Veterans.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A quasi-experimental study using VHA administrative data from October 2017 through September 2021. We applied interrupted time series models to estimate changes in primary care quality measures associated with CRH utilization. Results are reported as percentages.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>National cohort of 107 propensity-matched VHA clinics that did and did not use CRH primary care services INTERVENTION(S): CRH primary care services MAIN MEASURE(S): Chronic disease quality measures KEY RESULTS: For diabetes quality measures, we found similar results between CRH-utilizing clinics and their controls, including annual HbA1c screening (0.0% percentage difference (-1.0%, 1.0%), p = 0.640), poor HbA1c control (-1.0% (-1.0%, 0.0%), p=0.111), control of blood pressure for Veterans with diabetes (1.0% (-0.0%, 3.0%), p=0.095), statin therapy for Veterans with diabetes (1.0% (0.0%, 1.0%), p=0.003), statin adherence for Veterans with diabetes (0.0% (-1.0%, 0.0%), p=0.292), and nephropathy screening (1.0% (0.0%, 1.0%), p=0.010). There were no differences between clinic groups for control of blood pressure (1.0% (-1.0%, 2.0%), p=0.382). For cardiovascular quality measures, including statin therapy for Veterans with cardiovascular disease (0.0% (-1.0%, 2.0%), p=0.348), and statin adherence for Veterans with cardiovascular disease (-1.0% (-3.0%, 1.0%), p=0.467), we found no differences between clinic groups. Similar results were found among clinics that serve a high proportion of minority Veterans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that quality measures at CRH-utilizing clinics are similar to matched comparator clinics. These findings demonstrate that telehealth interventions, like CRH, can improve access to primary health care in a variety of settings, without impacting the quality of primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Implementation of a Regional Telehealth Contingency Staffing Program and Primary Care Quality in the Veterans Health Administration: Evidence from the Clinical Resource Hub program.\",\"authors\":\"Chelle L Wheat, Sara E Kath, Karin M Nelson, Idamay Curtis, Ashok Reddy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-025-09615-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) launched the Clinical Resource Hub (CRH) program to address primary care staffing deficits and improve access.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if the quality of primary care at clinics that use CRH services was similar to that of clinics that did not. Secondarily, to examine this association for clinics that serve a high proportion of minority Veterans.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A quasi-experimental study using VHA administrative data from October 2017 through September 2021. We applied interrupted time series models to estimate changes in primary care quality measures associated with CRH utilization. Results are reported as percentages.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>National cohort of 107 propensity-matched VHA clinics that did and did not use CRH primary care services INTERVENTION(S): CRH primary care services MAIN MEASURE(S): Chronic disease quality measures KEY RESULTS: For diabetes quality measures, we found similar results between CRH-utilizing clinics and their controls, including annual HbA1c screening (0.0% percentage difference (-1.0%, 1.0%), p = 0.640), poor HbA1c control (-1.0% (-1.0%, 0.0%), p=0.111), control of blood pressure for Veterans with diabetes (1.0% (-0.0%, 3.0%), p=0.095), statin therapy for Veterans with diabetes (1.0% (0.0%, 1.0%), p=0.003), statin adherence for Veterans with diabetes (0.0% (-1.0%, 0.0%), p=0.292), and nephropathy screening (1.0% (0.0%, 1.0%), p=0.010). There were no differences between clinic groups for control of blood pressure (1.0% (-1.0%, 2.0%), p=0.382). For cardiovascular quality measures, including statin therapy for Veterans with cardiovascular disease (0.0% (-1.0%, 2.0%), p=0.348), and statin adherence for Veterans with cardiovascular disease (-1.0% (-3.0%, 1.0%), p=0.467), we found no differences between clinic groups. Similar results were found among clinics that serve a high proportion of minority Veterans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that quality measures at CRH-utilizing clinics are similar to matched comparator clinics. These findings demonstrate that telehealth interventions, like CRH, can improve access to primary health care in a variety of settings, without impacting the quality of primary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09615-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09615-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)启动了临床资源中心(CRH)计划,以解决初级保健人员短缺和改善访问。目的:确定使用CRH服务的诊所的初级保健质量是否与不使用CRH服务的诊所相似。其次,研究为少数族裔退伍军人提供服务的诊所之间的联系。设计:一项准实验研究,使用2017年10月至2021年9月的VHA管理数据。我们应用中断时间序列模型来估计与CRH利用相关的初级保健质量指标的变化。结果以百分比报告。参与者:107个使用和未使用CRH初级保健服务的倾向匹配的VHA诊所的国家队列干预(S): CRH初级保健服务主要测量(S):慢性病质量测量对于糖尿病质量测量,我们发现使用crh的诊所和对照组之间的结果相似,包括年度HbA1c筛查(0.0%百分比差异(-1.0%,1.0%),p= 0.640), HbA1c控制不佳(-1.0% (-1.0%,0.0%),p=0.111),糖尿病退伍军人血压控制(1.0% (-0.0%,3.0%),p=0.095),糖尿病退伍军人他汀类药物治疗(1.0% (0.0%,1.0%),p=0.003),糖尿病退伍军人他汀类药物依从性(0.0% (-1.0%,0.0%),p=0.292),肾病筛查(1.0% (0.0%,1.0%),p=0.010)。临床组间血压控制差异无统计学意义(1.0% (-1.0%,2.0%),p=0.382)。对于心血管质量指标,包括心血管疾病退伍军人的他汀类药物治疗(0.0% (-1.0%,2.0%),p=0.348)和心血管疾病退伍军人的他汀类药物依从性(-1.0% (-3.0%,1.0%),p=0.467),我们发现临床组之间没有差异。在为少数族裔退伍军人提供服务的诊所中也发现了类似的结果。结论:我们发现使用crh的诊所的质量测量与匹配的比较诊所相似。这些发现表明,远程保健干预措施,如CRH,可以在各种环境中改善获得初级卫生保健的机会,而不会影响初级卫生保健的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early Implementation of a Regional Telehealth Contingency Staffing Program and Primary Care Quality in the Veterans Health Administration: Evidence from the Clinical Resource Hub program.

Background: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) launched the Clinical Resource Hub (CRH) program to address primary care staffing deficits and improve access.

Objective: To determine if the quality of primary care at clinics that use CRH services was similar to that of clinics that did not. Secondarily, to examine this association for clinics that serve a high proportion of minority Veterans.

Design: A quasi-experimental study using VHA administrative data from October 2017 through September 2021. We applied interrupted time series models to estimate changes in primary care quality measures associated with CRH utilization. Results are reported as percentages.

Participants: National cohort of 107 propensity-matched VHA clinics that did and did not use CRH primary care services INTERVENTION(S): CRH primary care services MAIN MEASURE(S): Chronic disease quality measures KEY RESULTS: For diabetes quality measures, we found similar results between CRH-utilizing clinics and their controls, including annual HbA1c screening (0.0% percentage difference (-1.0%, 1.0%), p = 0.640), poor HbA1c control (-1.0% (-1.0%, 0.0%), p=0.111), control of blood pressure for Veterans with diabetes (1.0% (-0.0%, 3.0%), p=0.095), statin therapy for Veterans with diabetes (1.0% (0.0%, 1.0%), p=0.003), statin adherence for Veterans with diabetes (0.0% (-1.0%, 0.0%), p=0.292), and nephropathy screening (1.0% (0.0%, 1.0%), p=0.010). There were no differences between clinic groups for control of blood pressure (1.0% (-1.0%, 2.0%), p=0.382). For cardiovascular quality measures, including statin therapy for Veterans with cardiovascular disease (0.0% (-1.0%, 2.0%), p=0.348), and statin adherence for Veterans with cardiovascular disease (-1.0% (-3.0%, 1.0%), p=0.467), we found no differences between clinic groups. Similar results were found among clinics that serve a high proportion of minority Veterans.

Conclusions: We found that quality measures at CRH-utilizing clinics are similar to matched comparator clinics. These findings demonstrate that telehealth interventions, like CRH, can improve access to primary health care in a variety of settings, without impacting the quality of primary care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信