暴露疗法在混合现实强迫症:一项随机临床试验。

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Franziska Miegel, Lena Jelinek, Luzie Lohse, Steffen Moritz, Jannik Blömer, Kim Juckoff, Amir Yassari, Lara Rolvien
{"title":"暴露疗法在混合现实强迫症:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Franziska Miegel, Lena Jelinek, Luzie Lohse, Steffen Moritz, Jannik Blömer, Kim Juckoff, Amir Yassari, Lara Rolvien","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.11488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Exposure therapy in virtual reality (VR) is well established for anxiety disorders. While early studies show promise for VR-based exposure and response prevention (ERP) in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), a key challenge of traditional VR is the weak sense of presence, deemed crucial for effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of ERP in mixed reality (MERP).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized clinical trial (RCT) included 2 outpatient treatment groups, MERP vs self-guided ERP (SERP) from March 15, 2022, to October 26, 2024. Participants were required to be 18 to 80 years of age and have contamination-related OCD (C-OCD). Exclusion criteria consisted of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, severe substance use disorder, acute suicidality, and ongoing inpatient treatment. Patients' symptom severity was assessed by the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) before (baseline) and after the 6-week intervention period as well as 3 months after posttreatment (follow-up).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Six sessions of MERP or SERP.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Main outcome was the severity of OCD symptoms in the past 7 days on the Y-BOCS. Sense of presence and subjective appraisal were the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six participants fulfilled inclusion criteria. Twenty-four participants (66.7%) were female; mean (SD) age was 35.42 (14.03) years. Both groups had severe OCD symptoms, with major depressive disorder as the most common comorbidity (23 [63.9%]). Twenty-nine participants (80.6%) completed the postintervention and follow-up assessments. At baseline, patients in the MERP group had a mean (SD) Y-BOCS score of 26.94 (5.83), while the SERP group had a mean (SD) score of 24.22 (4.12). The decline in patients' OCD symptoms (Y-BOCS) was similar in the MERP (mean difference, 3.15) and the SERP groups (mean difference, 1.47) (ηp2 = 0.002; 95% CI, -3.187 to 3.893). Significant improvements were observed within the MERP group from baseline to post treatment across several psychopathological variables, including OCD symptoms, with a medium to large effect (Cohen d, 0.584-0.931; 95% CI, 0.026-1.551). Sense of presence was moderate (mean [SD], ≤3.24 [≤2.07]). Subjective appraisal was heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This RCT on MERP in C-OCD provided important insights. While there were no significant between-group differences, changes in psychopathology within the MERP group suggest some level of effectiveness. However, the limited impact indicates that the full potential of MERP has not yet been realized, and future research should aim to improve immersion and overall effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trial Registry: DRKS00020969.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 5","pages":"e2511488"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exposure Therapy in Mixed Reality for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Franziska Miegel, Lena Jelinek, Luzie Lohse, Steffen Moritz, Jannik Blömer, Kim Juckoff, Amir Yassari, Lara Rolvien\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.11488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Exposure therapy in virtual reality (VR) is well established for anxiety disorders. While early studies show promise for VR-based exposure and response prevention (ERP) in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), a key challenge of traditional VR is the weak sense of presence, deemed crucial for effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of ERP in mixed reality (MERP).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized clinical trial (RCT) included 2 outpatient treatment groups, MERP vs self-guided ERP (SERP) from March 15, 2022, to October 26, 2024. Participants were required to be 18 to 80 years of age and have contamination-related OCD (C-OCD). Exclusion criteria consisted of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, severe substance use disorder, acute suicidality, and ongoing inpatient treatment. Patients' symptom severity was assessed by the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) before (baseline) and after the 6-week intervention period as well as 3 months after posttreatment (follow-up).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Six sessions of MERP or SERP.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Main outcome was the severity of OCD symptoms in the past 7 days on the Y-BOCS. Sense of presence and subjective appraisal were the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six participants fulfilled inclusion criteria. Twenty-four participants (66.7%) were female; mean (SD) age was 35.42 (14.03) years. Both groups had severe OCD symptoms, with major depressive disorder as the most common comorbidity (23 [63.9%]). Twenty-nine participants (80.6%) completed the postintervention and follow-up assessments. At baseline, patients in the MERP group had a mean (SD) Y-BOCS score of 26.94 (5.83), while the SERP group had a mean (SD) score of 24.22 (4.12). The decline in patients' OCD symptoms (Y-BOCS) was similar in the MERP (mean difference, 3.15) and the SERP groups (mean difference, 1.47) (ηp2 = 0.002; 95% CI, -3.187 to 3.893). Significant improvements were observed within the MERP group from baseline to post treatment across several psychopathological variables, including OCD symptoms, with a medium to large effect (Cohen d, 0.584-0.931; 95% CI, 0.026-1.551). Sense of presence was moderate (mean [SD], ≤3.24 [≤2.07]). Subjective appraisal was heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This RCT on MERP in C-OCD provided important insights. While there were no significant between-group differences, changes in psychopathology within the MERP group suggest some level of effectiveness. However, the limited impact indicates that the full potential of MERP has not yet been realized, and future research should aim to improve immersion and overall effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trial Registry: DRKS00020969.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"volume\":\"8 5\",\"pages\":\"e2511488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093188/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.11488\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.11488","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:暴露疗法在虚拟现实(VR)治疗焦虑症方面已经得到了很好的证实。虽然早期的研究显示基于VR的暴露和反应预防(ERP)在强迫症(OCD)中有希望,但传统VR的一个关键挑战是存在感薄弱,这被认为是有效性的关键。目的:评价ERP在混合现实(MERP)中的可行性和有效性。设计、环境和参与者:该随机临床试验(RCT)包括两个门诊治疗组,MERP与自我引导ERP (SERP),时间为2022年3月15日至2024年10月26日。参与者被要求年龄在18到80岁之间,患有与污染有关的强迫症(C-OCD)。排除标准包括精神分裂症或双相情感障碍、严重物质使用障碍、急性自杀倾向和持续住院治疗。采用耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)评估患者在治疗前(基线)、干预期6周后及治疗后3个月(随访)的症状严重程度。干预:6次MERP或SERP。主要结局和测量方法:主要结局是过去7天Y-BOCS上强迫症症状的严重程度。存在感和主观评价是次要结果。结果:36例受试者符合纳入标准。女性24例(66.7%);平均(SD)年龄为35.42(14.03)岁。两组患者均有严重的强迫症症状,最常见的合并症为重度抑郁症(23例[63.9%])。29名参与者(80.6%)完成了干预后和随访评估。在基线时,MERP组患者的平均(SD) Y-BOCS评分为26.94(5.83),而SERP组患者的平均(SD)评分为24.22(4.12)。MERP组和SERP组患者强迫症症状(Y-BOCS)的下降相似(平均差值为3.15)(平均差值为1.47)(ηp2 = 0.002;95% CI, -3.187至3.893)。从基线到治疗后,MERP组在几个精神病理变量(包括强迫症症状)上观察到显著的改善,有中等到较大的影响(Cohen d, 0.584-0.931;95% ci, 0.026-1.551)。存在感中等(mean [SD],≤3.24[≤2.07])。主观评价具有异质性。结论:这项关于C-OCD患者MERP的随机对照试验提供了重要的见解。虽然两组之间没有明显的差异,但MERP组内精神病理的变化表明了一定程度的有效性。然而,有限的影响表明MERP的潜力尚未充分发挥,未来的研究应以提高沉浸感和整体有效性为目标。试验注册:德国临床试验注册:DRKS00020969。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exposure Therapy in Mixed Reality for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Exposure therapy in virtual reality (VR) is well established for anxiety disorders. While early studies show promise for VR-based exposure and response prevention (ERP) in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), a key challenge of traditional VR is the weak sense of presence, deemed crucial for effectiveness.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of ERP in mixed reality (MERP).

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial (RCT) included 2 outpatient treatment groups, MERP vs self-guided ERP (SERP) from March 15, 2022, to October 26, 2024. Participants were required to be 18 to 80 years of age and have contamination-related OCD (C-OCD). Exclusion criteria consisted of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, severe substance use disorder, acute suicidality, and ongoing inpatient treatment. Patients' symptom severity was assessed by the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) before (baseline) and after the 6-week intervention period as well as 3 months after posttreatment (follow-up).

Intervention: Six sessions of MERP or SERP.

Main outcomes and measures: Main outcome was the severity of OCD symptoms in the past 7 days on the Y-BOCS. Sense of presence and subjective appraisal were the secondary outcomes.

Results: Thirty-six participants fulfilled inclusion criteria. Twenty-four participants (66.7%) were female; mean (SD) age was 35.42 (14.03) years. Both groups had severe OCD symptoms, with major depressive disorder as the most common comorbidity (23 [63.9%]). Twenty-nine participants (80.6%) completed the postintervention and follow-up assessments. At baseline, patients in the MERP group had a mean (SD) Y-BOCS score of 26.94 (5.83), while the SERP group had a mean (SD) score of 24.22 (4.12). The decline in patients' OCD symptoms (Y-BOCS) was similar in the MERP (mean difference, 3.15) and the SERP groups (mean difference, 1.47) (ηp2 = 0.002; 95% CI, -3.187 to 3.893). Significant improvements were observed within the MERP group from baseline to post treatment across several psychopathological variables, including OCD symptoms, with a medium to large effect (Cohen d, 0.584-0.931; 95% CI, 0.026-1.551). Sense of presence was moderate (mean [SD], ≤3.24 [≤2.07]). Subjective appraisal was heterogeneous.

Conclusions: This RCT on MERP in C-OCD provided important insights. While there were no significant between-group differences, changes in psychopathology within the MERP group suggest some level of effectiveness. However, the limited impact indicates that the full potential of MERP has not yet been realized, and future research should aim to improve immersion and overall effectiveness.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trial Registry: DRKS00020969.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信