政治、地缘政治和科学史:论詹姆斯·西科德的《发明科学革命》。

IF 0.5 4区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos Pub Date : 2025-05-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/S0104-59702025000100021
Ana Barahona, Brian Becerra-Bressant, Diana Galván-Escobar, Lucía Granados-Riveros, Marco Ornelas-Cruces, Kapil Raj, Daniel Serrano-Juárez, Erica Torrens, Teresa Villegas-López, María Alicia Villela-González
{"title":"政治、地缘政治和科学史:论詹姆斯·西科德的《发明科学革命》。","authors":"Ana Barahona, Brian Becerra-Bressant, Diana Galván-Escobar, Lucía Granados-Riveros, Marco Ornelas-Cruces, Kapil Raj, Daniel Serrano-Juárez, Erica Torrens, Teresa Villegas-López, María Alicia Villela-González","doi":"10.1590/S0104-59702025000100021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the institutionalisation of the history of science as a discipline in the early 1950s, the \"Scientific Revolution\" has been its master narrative and central organising principle. However, this narrative has attracted critical scrutiny since the last decades of the twentieth century. For many historians, the idea of the Scientific Revolution was formulated when the history of science was confined overwhelmingly to North American and British institutions. Instead of focusing on Europe and the West, it might be more fruitful to recognise the influence of post-Second World War politics in shaping the concept, while also taking into account the demographic changes in the discipline, which today includes women and men from all over the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":13134,"journal":{"name":"Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos","volume":"32 ","pages":"e202502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12091855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Politics, geopolitics, and the history of science: on James Secord's \\\"Inventing the scientific revolution\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Ana Barahona, Brian Becerra-Bressant, Diana Galván-Escobar, Lucía Granados-Riveros, Marco Ornelas-Cruces, Kapil Raj, Daniel Serrano-Juárez, Erica Torrens, Teresa Villegas-López, María Alicia Villela-González\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S0104-59702025000100021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since the institutionalisation of the history of science as a discipline in the early 1950s, the \\\"Scientific Revolution\\\" has been its master narrative and central organising principle. However, this narrative has attracted critical scrutiny since the last decades of the twentieth century. For many historians, the idea of the Scientific Revolution was formulated when the history of science was confined overwhelmingly to North American and British institutions. Instead of focusing on Europe and the West, it might be more fruitful to recognise the influence of post-Second World War politics in shaping the concept, while also taking into account the demographic changes in the discipline, which today includes women and men from all over the world.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"e202502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12091855/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702025000100021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702025000100021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自从20世纪50年代早期科学史作为一门学科被制度化以来,“科学革命”一直是它的主要叙述和中心组织原则。然而,自20世纪最后几十年以来,这种叙述引起了批判性的审视。对许多历史学家来说,科学革命的概念是在科学史被压倒性地局限于北美和英国的机构时形成的。与其关注欧洲和西方,不如认识到二战后政治对这一概念形成的影响,同时也考虑到这一学科的人口变化,如今包括来自世界各地的女性和男性,这可能会更有成效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Politics, geopolitics, and the history of science: on James Secord's "Inventing the scientific revolution".

Since the institutionalisation of the history of science as a discipline in the early 1950s, the "Scientific Revolution" has been its master narrative and central organising principle. However, this narrative has attracted critical scrutiny since the last decades of the twentieth century. For many historians, the idea of the Scientific Revolution was formulated when the history of science was confined overwhelmingly to North American and British institutions. Instead of focusing on Europe and the West, it might be more fruitful to recognise the influence of post-Second World War politics in shaping the concept, while also taking into account the demographic changes in the discipline, which today includes women and men from all over the world.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos
Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信