Jae Hee Cheon, Byong Duk Ye, Alessandro Armuzzi, Florian Rieder, Giampiero Girolomoni, Luis Puig, Hojung Jung, Steven R Feldman
{"title":"ustekinumab生物仿制药SB17的“证据总体”和“外推”。","authors":"Jae Hee Cheon, Byong Duk Ye, Alessandro Armuzzi, Florian Rieder, Giampiero Girolomoni, Luis Puig, Hojung Jung, Steven R Feldman","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2508838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>SB17 is a ustekinumab (UST) biosimilar targeting interleukin-12/23 for treating immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). The development of UST biosimilars like SB17 may help address the high cost of innovator biologics, offering affordable alternatives without compromising efficacy or safety.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review encompasses the totality of evidence supporting SB17's similarity to UST, its regulatory approval, and indication extrapolation. It also discusses SB17's lower immunogenicity relative to UST.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The approval of UST biosimilars represents a significant advancement in managing chronic IMIDs including psoriasis, plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis, providing cost-effective, efficacious alternatives. A randomized double-blind 28-week study involving over 500 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis demonstrated SB17's equivalence to UST, with more than 80% of patients achieving over 90% improvement in psoriasis severity indices. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between SB17 and UST. Despite their potential to transform clinical outcomes, economic burdens, and drug utilization patterns, the adoption of UST biosimilars faces challenges, including concerns about equivalence and regulatory inconsistencies. Addressing these issues through education, consistent regulatory frameworks, real-world data, and ongoing monitoring is crucial for their successful integration into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 'totality of evidence' and 'extrapolation' of SB17, a ustekinumab biosimilar.\",\"authors\":\"Jae Hee Cheon, Byong Duk Ye, Alessandro Armuzzi, Florian Rieder, Giampiero Girolomoni, Luis Puig, Hojung Jung, Steven R Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14712598.2025.2508838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>SB17 is a ustekinumab (UST) biosimilar targeting interleukin-12/23 for treating immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). The development of UST biosimilars like SB17 may help address the high cost of innovator biologics, offering affordable alternatives without compromising efficacy or safety.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review encompasses the totality of evidence supporting SB17's similarity to UST, its regulatory approval, and indication extrapolation. It also discusses SB17's lower immunogenicity relative to UST.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The approval of UST biosimilars represents a significant advancement in managing chronic IMIDs including psoriasis, plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis, providing cost-effective, efficacious alternatives. A randomized double-blind 28-week study involving over 500 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis demonstrated SB17's equivalence to UST, with more than 80% of patients achieving over 90% improvement in psoriasis severity indices. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between SB17 and UST. Despite their potential to transform clinical outcomes, economic burdens, and drug utilization patterns, the adoption of UST biosimilars faces challenges, including concerns about equivalence and regulatory inconsistencies. Addressing these issues through education, consistent regulatory frameworks, real-world data, and ongoing monitoring is crucial for their successful integration into clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2508838\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2508838","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The 'totality of evidence' and 'extrapolation' of SB17, a ustekinumab biosimilar.
Introduction: SB17 is a ustekinumab (UST) biosimilar targeting interleukin-12/23 for treating immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). The development of UST biosimilars like SB17 may help address the high cost of innovator biologics, offering affordable alternatives without compromising efficacy or safety.
Areas covered: This review encompasses the totality of evidence supporting SB17's similarity to UST, its regulatory approval, and indication extrapolation. It also discusses SB17's lower immunogenicity relative to UST.
Expert opinion: The approval of UST biosimilars represents a significant advancement in managing chronic IMIDs including psoriasis, plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis, providing cost-effective, efficacious alternatives. A randomized double-blind 28-week study involving over 500 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis demonstrated SB17's equivalence to UST, with more than 80% of patients achieving over 90% improvement in psoriasis severity indices. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between SB17 and UST. Despite their potential to transform clinical outcomes, economic burdens, and drug utilization patterns, the adoption of UST biosimilars faces challenges, including concerns about equivalence and regulatory inconsistencies. Addressing these issues through education, consistent regulatory frameworks, real-world data, and ongoing monitoring is crucial for their successful integration into clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy.
Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development.
The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease.
The journal welcomes:
Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine
Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent
Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results;
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.