“很高兴见到你……我们要不要生个孩子?”英国报纸媒体对PACT家庭的描述。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Lei Decappelle, M De Proost, V Provoost
{"title":"“很高兴见到你……我们要不要生个孩子?”英国报纸媒体对PACT家庭的描述。","authors":"Lei Decappelle, M De Proost, V Provoost","doi":"10.1080/13691058.2025.2505478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper attempts to provide insight into the social interpretation of pre-conceptually agreed-upon co-parenting (i.e. 'PACT', 'elective co-parenting', 'platonic co-parenting' or 'intentional co-parenting') families through a critical investigation of UK newspaper portrayals using reflexive thematic analysis with special attention paid to ascriptions of responsibility. Two main themes were identified: 'untraditionally conventional after all', and 'answering to your future children'. Our findings reveal how PACT appears to be presented in a nuanced manner. Journalists, along with the co-parents they portray, oscillate between different ways of looking at the practice. A picture of PACT is constructed that is simultaneously traditional and post-traditional (or modern), sometimes emphasising one aspect more prominently than the other. In the latter instances, the use of normative or evaluative language is more apparent. This suggests an active process of moral reflection within the articles. Notably, both traditional and post-traditional narratives are put to work in the defence of PACT, illustrating that, in certain contexts, 'tradition' and 'post-tradition' are not necessarily normatively opposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10799,"journal":{"name":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Nice to meet you … shall we have a baby?': Portrayals of PACT families in UK newspaper media.\",\"authors\":\"Lei Decappelle, M De Proost, V Provoost\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13691058.2025.2505478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper attempts to provide insight into the social interpretation of pre-conceptually agreed-upon co-parenting (i.e. 'PACT', 'elective co-parenting', 'platonic co-parenting' or 'intentional co-parenting') families through a critical investigation of UK newspaper portrayals using reflexive thematic analysis with special attention paid to ascriptions of responsibility. Two main themes were identified: 'untraditionally conventional after all', and 'answering to your future children'. Our findings reveal how PACT appears to be presented in a nuanced manner. Journalists, along with the co-parents they portray, oscillate between different ways of looking at the practice. A picture of PACT is constructed that is simultaneously traditional and post-traditional (or modern), sometimes emphasising one aspect more prominently than the other. In the latter instances, the use of normative or evaluative language is more apparent. This suggests an active process of moral reflection within the articles. Notably, both traditional and post-traditional narratives are put to work in the defence of PACT, illustrating that, in certain contexts, 'tradition' and 'post-tradition' are not necessarily normatively opposed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture, Health & Sexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture, Health & Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2025.2505478\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2025.2505478","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图提供对概念前商定的共同抚养(即父母)的社会解释的见解。“PACT”,“选择性共同养育”,“柏拉图式共同养育”或“故意共同养育”)家庭,通过对英国报纸肖像的批判性调查,使用反思性主题分析,特别关注责任的归属。调查确定了两个主要主题:“毕竟是非传统的”和“对未来孩子的回应”。我们的发现揭示了PACT是如何以一种微妙的方式呈现的。记者们,以及他们所描绘的共同父母,在看待这种做法的不同方式之间摇摆不定。PACT的画面同时被构建为传统和后传统(或现代),有时强调一个方面比另一个更突出。在后一种情况下,规范性或评价性语言的使用更为明显。这表明文章中有一个积极的道德反思过程。值得注意的是,传统和后传统叙事都在为PACT辩护,说明在某些情况下,“传统”和“后传统”在规范上不一定是对立的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Nice to meet you … shall we have a baby?': Portrayals of PACT families in UK newspaper media.

This paper attempts to provide insight into the social interpretation of pre-conceptually agreed-upon co-parenting (i.e. 'PACT', 'elective co-parenting', 'platonic co-parenting' or 'intentional co-parenting') families through a critical investigation of UK newspaper portrayals using reflexive thematic analysis with special attention paid to ascriptions of responsibility. Two main themes were identified: 'untraditionally conventional after all', and 'answering to your future children'. Our findings reveal how PACT appears to be presented in a nuanced manner. Journalists, along with the co-parents they portray, oscillate between different ways of looking at the practice. A picture of PACT is constructed that is simultaneously traditional and post-traditional (or modern), sometimes emphasising one aspect more prominently than the other. In the latter instances, the use of normative or evaluative language is more apparent. This suggests an active process of moral reflection within the articles. Notably, both traditional and post-traditional narratives are put to work in the defence of PACT, illustrating that, in certain contexts, 'tradition' and 'post-tradition' are not necessarily normatively opposed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信