医生和护士对新加坡急诊科实施临床药学服务的障碍和促进因素的看法

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Glen Qin Yi Mun, Ruth Kait Rae Kwan, Chuan Poh Lim, Jie Lin Soong
{"title":"医生和护士对新加坡急诊科实施临床药学服务的障碍和促进因素的看法","authors":"Glen Qin Yi Mun,&nbsp;Ruth Kait Rae Kwan,&nbsp;Chuan Poh Lim,&nbsp;Jie Lin Soong","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Emergency Medicine (EM) clinical pharmacy services are an increasingly widespread practice globally and have been shown to improve patient safety and care in the high-risk environment of the emergency department (ED). However, limited information is published on the implementation barriers and facilitators of these services. This study assessed the current needs of ED doctors and nurses in Singapore General Hospital (SGH) and evaluated their perceptions towards EM clinical pharmacy services. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of these services in the new SGH EM building were further explored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An anonymous survey was sent to all SGH ED doctors and nurses to assess their perceptions towards EM clinical pharmacy services. Qualitative data on barriers and facilitators were explored through open-ended questions in the survey and semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were analysed via thematic analysis using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 205 survey responses were collected, and seven interviews were conducted. The top-ranked services identified were drug information consultation, facilitating timely treatment of emergency conditions, and providing staff and patient education. Pertinent barriers to the implementation of the services comprised cost, culture, compatibility, and staffing. Key facilitators included the relative advantage of the services, tension for change within SGH ED, tailoring strategies, and engaging doctors and nurses during the implementation process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>ED doctors and nurses favourably perceived EM clinical pharmacy services. Strategies to implement the services should be tailored to address barriers and leverage facilitators identified for successful implementation within the local ED context.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doctors' and Nurses' Perceptions on Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Clinical Pharmacy Services in the Emergency Department in Singapore\",\"authors\":\"Glen Qin Yi Mun,&nbsp;Ruth Kait Rae Kwan,&nbsp;Chuan Poh Lim,&nbsp;Jie Lin Soong\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1742-6723.70062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Emergency Medicine (EM) clinical pharmacy services are an increasingly widespread practice globally and have been shown to improve patient safety and care in the high-risk environment of the emergency department (ED). However, limited information is published on the implementation barriers and facilitators of these services. This study assessed the current needs of ED doctors and nurses in Singapore General Hospital (SGH) and evaluated their perceptions towards EM clinical pharmacy services. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of these services in the new SGH EM building were further explored.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>An anonymous survey was sent to all SGH ED doctors and nurses to assess their perceptions towards EM clinical pharmacy services. Qualitative data on barriers and facilitators were explored through open-ended questions in the survey and semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were analysed via thematic analysis using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 205 survey responses were collected, and seven interviews were conducted. The top-ranked services identified were drug information consultation, facilitating timely treatment of emergency conditions, and providing staff and patient education. Pertinent barriers to the implementation of the services comprised cost, culture, compatibility, and staffing. Key facilitators included the relative advantage of the services, tension for change within SGH ED, tailoring strategies, and engaging doctors and nurses during the implementation process.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>ED doctors and nurses favourably perceived EM clinical pharmacy services. Strategies to implement the services should be tailored to address barriers and leverage facilitators identified for successful implementation within the local ED context.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70062\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急诊医学(EM)临床药学服务在全球范围内日益广泛,并已被证明可以提高急诊科(ED)高风险环境中的患者安全和护理。然而,关于这些服务的实施障碍和促进因素的信息有限。本研究评估了新加坡总医院(SGH)急诊科医生和护士的当前需求,并评估了他们对急诊科临床药学服务的看法。我们进一步探讨了在新SGH EM大楼实施这些服务的障碍和促进因素。方法采用匿名调查的方式,对SGH ED的医生和护士进行调查,了解他们对急诊临床药学服务的看法。通过调查中的开放式问题和半结构化访谈,探讨了障碍和促进因素的定性数据。定性数据通过专题分析使用实施研究综合框架进行分析。结果共收集问卷205份,进行7次访谈。排名前几位的服务是药品信息咨询,促进紧急情况的及时治疗,以及提供工作人员和患者教育。实现这些服务的相关障碍包括成本、文化、兼容性和人员配备。主要的促进因素包括服务的相对优势、SGH ED内部变革的压力、定制策略以及在实施过程中让医生和护士参与进来。结论急诊科医生和护士对急诊科临床药学服务的评价较高。实施这些服务的战略应加以调整,以解决障碍,并利用已确定的促进因素,以便在当地教育环境中成功实施这些服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Doctors' and Nurses' Perceptions on Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Clinical Pharmacy Services in the Emergency Department in Singapore

Background

Emergency Medicine (EM) clinical pharmacy services are an increasingly widespread practice globally and have been shown to improve patient safety and care in the high-risk environment of the emergency department (ED). However, limited information is published on the implementation barriers and facilitators of these services. This study assessed the current needs of ED doctors and nurses in Singapore General Hospital (SGH) and evaluated their perceptions towards EM clinical pharmacy services. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of these services in the new SGH EM building were further explored.

Methods

An anonymous survey was sent to all SGH ED doctors and nurses to assess their perceptions towards EM clinical pharmacy services. Qualitative data on barriers and facilitators were explored through open-ended questions in the survey and semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were analysed via thematic analysis using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research.

Results

A total of 205 survey responses were collected, and seven interviews were conducted. The top-ranked services identified were drug information consultation, facilitating timely treatment of emergency conditions, and providing staff and patient education. Pertinent barriers to the implementation of the services comprised cost, culture, compatibility, and staffing. Key facilitators included the relative advantage of the services, tension for change within SGH ED, tailoring strategies, and engaging doctors and nurses during the implementation process.

Conclusion

ED doctors and nurses favourably perceived EM clinical pharmacy services. Strategies to implement the services should be tailored to address barriers and leverage facilitators identified for successful implementation within the local ED context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信