{"title":"算法视觉化对小学生算法学习表现、动机及行为之影响","authors":"Qian Fu, Xinyi Zhou, Yafeng Zheng, Zhenyi Wang","doi":"10.1111/jcal.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Understanding algorithms is crucial for programming education, yet their abstract nature often challenges students. Algorithm visualisation (AV) has been proven effective in enhancing algorithmic thinking among university students. However, its efficacy for elementary school students and the optimal forms of AV tools remain unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to assess learners' performance, motivation, and behaviour under three AV forms (i.e., algorithm animation, static visualisation, and no visualisation) from both scientific and behavioural perspectives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A quasiexperimental design was employed, involving 104 sixth-grade students (aged 11–12) from a K–12 school in eastern China. A 9-week algorithm-teaching activity covering the optimal path, enumeration, and search algorithms was conducted in an in-school extension class. Two experimental groups and one control group each used a different AV form. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires and an algorithm competency test (ACT), whereas behavioural data were analysed from computer screen recordings and classroom video recordings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although no significant differences were found in overall learning performance, algorithm animation was particularly beneficial for high-proficiency students. Algorithm animation and static visualisation significantly enhanced students' learning motivation compared with no visualisation. A behavioural analysis revealed that students using algorithm animation demonstrated greater autonomy and initiative, whereas those students who did not use visualisation preferred passive learning. This study on AV-based algorithm teaching concludes that introducing AV effectively improves students' initiative and motivation, providing insights for integrating visualisations in instructor-mediated classrooms.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Algorithm Visualisation on Elementary School Students' Algorithm-Learning Performance, Motivation, and Behaviour\",\"authors\":\"Qian Fu, Xinyi Zhou, Yafeng Zheng, Zhenyi Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcal.70049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Understanding algorithms is crucial for programming education, yet their abstract nature often challenges students. Algorithm visualisation (AV) has been proven effective in enhancing algorithmic thinking among university students. However, its efficacy for elementary school students and the optimal forms of AV tools remain unclear.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aims to assess learners' performance, motivation, and behaviour under three AV forms (i.e., algorithm animation, static visualisation, and no visualisation) from both scientific and behavioural perspectives.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A quasiexperimental design was employed, involving 104 sixth-grade students (aged 11–12) from a K–12 school in eastern China. A 9-week algorithm-teaching activity covering the optimal path, enumeration, and search algorithms was conducted in an in-school extension class. Two experimental groups and one control group each used a different AV form. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires and an algorithm competency test (ACT), whereas behavioural data were analysed from computer screen recordings and classroom video recordings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although no significant differences were found in overall learning performance, algorithm animation was particularly beneficial for high-proficiency students. Algorithm animation and static visualisation significantly enhanced students' learning motivation compared with no visualisation. A behavioural analysis revealed that students using algorithm animation demonstrated greater autonomy and initiative, whereas those students who did not use visualisation preferred passive learning. This study on AV-based algorithm teaching concludes that introducing AV effectively improves students' initiative and motivation, providing insights for integrating visualisations in instructor-mediated classrooms.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70049\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effects of Algorithm Visualisation on Elementary School Students' Algorithm-Learning Performance, Motivation, and Behaviour
Background
Understanding algorithms is crucial for programming education, yet their abstract nature often challenges students. Algorithm visualisation (AV) has been proven effective in enhancing algorithmic thinking among university students. However, its efficacy for elementary school students and the optimal forms of AV tools remain unclear.
Objectives
This study aims to assess learners' performance, motivation, and behaviour under three AV forms (i.e., algorithm animation, static visualisation, and no visualisation) from both scientific and behavioural perspectives.
Methods
A quasiexperimental design was employed, involving 104 sixth-grade students (aged 11–12) from a K–12 school in eastern China. A 9-week algorithm-teaching activity covering the optimal path, enumeration, and search algorithms was conducted in an in-school extension class. Two experimental groups and one control group each used a different AV form. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires and an algorithm competency test (ACT), whereas behavioural data were analysed from computer screen recordings and classroom video recordings.
Results and Conclusions
Although no significant differences were found in overall learning performance, algorithm animation was particularly beneficial for high-proficiency students. Algorithm animation and static visualisation significantly enhanced students' learning motivation compared with no visualisation. A behavioural analysis revealed that students using algorithm animation demonstrated greater autonomy and initiative, whereas those students who did not use visualisation preferred passive learning. This study on AV-based algorithm teaching concludes that introducing AV effectively improves students' initiative and motivation, providing insights for integrating visualisations in instructor-mediated classrooms.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope