{"title":"围手术期地塞米松对孤立性下肢长骨骨折固定的住院时间、围手术期结局和安全性的影响","authors":"Tanios Dagher , Lohith Vatti , Diana Sosa , Jason Strelzow","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Corticosteroids are frequently administered perioperatively during arthroplasty procedures with reported reductions in length of stay (LOS), postoperative pain & nausea, and opioid consumption. This investigation aims to evaluate the effects of perioperative dexamethasone on LOS, post-operative outcomes, and adverse event rates for trauma patients undergoing femoral/tibial intramedullary nailing (IMN).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at an urban Level 1 Trauma center between May 2018 and May 2022. 201 patients aged 16–65 with isolated femur or tibia fractures treated with antegrade or retrograde femoral or tibial IMN underwent chart review. Those with mental or physical disability, GFR <30, liver disease, poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1C ≥ 8), or steroid use within 3 months were excluded. Patients with both open and closed fractures were included in the study. LOS postoperatively was compared between patients who received dexamethasone perioperatively (Dex, n = 88) and those who did not (No Dex, n = 113). Secondary outcomes pertained to inpatient admission (e.g. average pain score), time to union, incidence of nonunion by 6 months, and 90-day surgical site infection rate. Categorical outcomes were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum analysis and dichotomous data using chi-square testing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was no difference in LOS between groups (Dex 2.0 ± 1.6 days, No Dex 2.1 ± 1.3 days). While the Dex group had lower rates of superficial infection (Dex 0 % [0/43], No Dex 13.5 % [5/37]), opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalent [MME]) on postoperative day 0 (Dex 16.7 ± 16.1, No Dex 21.1 ± 17.4), and MME POD0-3 average (Dex 24.5 ± 16.5, No Dex 30.5 ± 18.3), these results were not statistically significant. There were no differences in other secondary outcomes, including time to union, pain scores, average blood glucose, and complication rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite previous literature supporting a reduction in LOS associated with perioperative dexamethasone administration, the current study demonstrated no difference in trauma patients undergoing tibial or femoral IMN. However, perioperative administration may provide short-term benefits without increasing adverse event rate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 103067"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative dexamethasone: Effects on length of stay, perioperative outcomes, and safety in isolated lower extremity long bone fracture fixation\",\"authors\":\"Tanios Dagher , Lohith Vatti , Diana Sosa , Jason Strelzow\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Corticosteroids are frequently administered perioperatively during arthroplasty procedures with reported reductions in length of stay (LOS), postoperative pain & nausea, and opioid consumption. This investigation aims to evaluate the effects of perioperative dexamethasone on LOS, post-operative outcomes, and adverse event rates for trauma patients undergoing femoral/tibial intramedullary nailing (IMN).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at an urban Level 1 Trauma center between May 2018 and May 2022. 201 patients aged 16–65 with isolated femur or tibia fractures treated with antegrade or retrograde femoral or tibial IMN underwent chart review. Those with mental or physical disability, GFR <30, liver disease, poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1C ≥ 8), or steroid use within 3 months were excluded. Patients with both open and closed fractures were included in the study. LOS postoperatively was compared between patients who received dexamethasone perioperatively (Dex, n = 88) and those who did not (No Dex, n = 113). Secondary outcomes pertained to inpatient admission (e.g. average pain score), time to union, incidence of nonunion by 6 months, and 90-day surgical site infection rate. Categorical outcomes were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum analysis and dichotomous data using chi-square testing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was no difference in LOS between groups (Dex 2.0 ± 1.6 days, No Dex 2.1 ± 1.3 days). While the Dex group had lower rates of superficial infection (Dex 0 % [0/43], No Dex 13.5 % [5/37]), opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalent [MME]) on postoperative day 0 (Dex 16.7 ± 16.1, No Dex 21.1 ± 17.4), and MME POD0-3 average (Dex 24.5 ± 16.5, No Dex 30.5 ± 18.3), these results were not statistically significant. There were no differences in other secondary outcomes, including time to union, pain scores, average blood glucose, and complication rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite previous literature supporting a reduction in LOS associated with perioperative dexamethasone administration, the current study demonstrated no difference in trauma patients undergoing tibial or femoral IMN. However, perioperative administration may provide short-term benefits without increasing adverse event rate.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225001651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225001651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perioperative dexamethasone: Effects on length of stay, perioperative outcomes, and safety in isolated lower extremity long bone fracture fixation
Background
Corticosteroids are frequently administered perioperatively during arthroplasty procedures with reported reductions in length of stay (LOS), postoperative pain & nausea, and opioid consumption. This investigation aims to evaluate the effects of perioperative dexamethasone on LOS, post-operative outcomes, and adverse event rates for trauma patients undergoing femoral/tibial intramedullary nailing (IMN).
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted at an urban Level 1 Trauma center between May 2018 and May 2022. 201 patients aged 16–65 with isolated femur or tibia fractures treated with antegrade or retrograde femoral or tibial IMN underwent chart review. Those with mental or physical disability, GFR <30, liver disease, poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1C ≥ 8), or steroid use within 3 months were excluded. Patients with both open and closed fractures were included in the study. LOS postoperatively was compared between patients who received dexamethasone perioperatively (Dex, n = 88) and those who did not (No Dex, n = 113). Secondary outcomes pertained to inpatient admission (e.g. average pain score), time to union, incidence of nonunion by 6 months, and 90-day surgical site infection rate. Categorical outcomes were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum analysis and dichotomous data using chi-square testing.
Results
There was no difference in LOS between groups (Dex 2.0 ± 1.6 days, No Dex 2.1 ± 1.3 days). While the Dex group had lower rates of superficial infection (Dex 0 % [0/43], No Dex 13.5 % [5/37]), opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalent [MME]) on postoperative day 0 (Dex 16.7 ± 16.1, No Dex 21.1 ± 17.4), and MME POD0-3 average (Dex 24.5 ± 16.5, No Dex 30.5 ± 18.3), these results were not statistically significant. There were no differences in other secondary outcomes, including time to union, pain scores, average blood glucose, and complication rates.
Conclusion
Despite previous literature supporting a reduction in LOS associated with perioperative dexamethasone administration, the current study demonstrated no difference in trauma patients undergoing tibial or femoral IMN. However, perioperative administration may provide short-term benefits without increasing adverse event rate.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.