电子商务中的意见挖掘:评估情感分析的机器学习方法

IF 3.2 Q3 Mathematics
L. Lakshmi , Ali B.M. Ali , K Dhana Sree Devi , Muhammad Rafiq , Iskandar Shernazarov , Nashwan Adnan Othman , M. Ijaz Khan
{"title":"电子商务中的意见挖掘:评估情感分析的机器学习方法","authors":"L. Lakshmi ,&nbsp;Ali B.M. Ali ,&nbsp;K Dhana Sree Devi ,&nbsp;Muhammad Rafiq ,&nbsp;Iskandar Shernazarov ,&nbsp;Nashwan Adnan Othman ,&nbsp;M. Ijaz Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.rico.2025.100575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, opinion mining has played a major role in analyzing text data from various sources such as Amazon, Capterra, Facebook, Google, GetApp, and Twitter. It enables companies to actively refine their business strategies. Sentiment analysis involves interpreting and classifying customer emotions (positive, neutral, and negative) expressed in reviews using sentiment analysis techniques such as BING and AFINN. This paper presents four approaches for customer review analysis and classification: the grade-based approach, content-based approach, content-based NRC-Emotion Lexicon approach, and collaborative approach. We employ three machine learning algorithms—stacking, random forest, and LogitBoost—to evaluate the performance of these approaches. A real-time dataset from Amazon product reviews is used for training and testing the model. Empirical results reveal that the collaborative approach outperforms the grade-based, content-based, and content-based NRC-Emotion Lexicon approaches across all three machine learning algorithms. Additionally, all approaches demonstrate outstanding performance when using the boosting algorithm for customer review classification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34733,"journal":{"name":"Results in Control and Optimization","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100575"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opinion mining in e-commerce: Evaluating machine learning approaches for sentiment analysis\",\"authors\":\"L. Lakshmi ,&nbsp;Ali B.M. Ali ,&nbsp;K Dhana Sree Devi ,&nbsp;Muhammad Rafiq ,&nbsp;Iskandar Shernazarov ,&nbsp;Nashwan Adnan Othman ,&nbsp;M. Ijaz Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rico.2025.100575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In recent years, opinion mining has played a major role in analyzing text data from various sources such as Amazon, Capterra, Facebook, Google, GetApp, and Twitter. It enables companies to actively refine their business strategies. Sentiment analysis involves interpreting and classifying customer emotions (positive, neutral, and negative) expressed in reviews using sentiment analysis techniques such as BING and AFINN. This paper presents four approaches for customer review analysis and classification: the grade-based approach, content-based approach, content-based NRC-Emotion Lexicon approach, and collaborative approach. We employ three machine learning algorithms—stacking, random forest, and LogitBoost—to evaluate the performance of these approaches. A real-time dataset from Amazon product reviews is used for training and testing the model. Empirical results reveal that the collaborative approach outperforms the grade-based, content-based, and content-based NRC-Emotion Lexicon approaches across all three machine learning algorithms. Additionally, all approaches demonstrate outstanding performance when using the boosting algorithm for customer review classification.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Results in Control and Optimization\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100575\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Results in Control and Optimization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266672072500061X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Control and Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266672072500061X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,意见挖掘在分析来自亚马逊、Capterra、Facebook、b谷歌、GetApp和Twitter等各种来源的文本数据方面发挥了重要作用。它使公司能够积极地改进他们的商业战略。情感分析涉及使用情感分析技术(如BING和AFINN)对评论中表达的客户情绪(积极、中立和消极)进行解释和分类。本文提出了四种客户评论分析和分类方法:基于分数的方法、基于内容的方法、基于内容的NRC-Emotion Lexicon方法和协作方法。我们使用了三种机器学习算法——堆叠、随机森林和logitboost——来评估这些方法的性能。来自亚马逊产品评论的实时数据集用于训练和测试模型。实证结果表明,协作方法在所有三种机器学习算法中都优于基于成绩、基于内容和基于内容的NRC-Emotion Lexicon方法。此外,在使用提升算法进行客户评论分类时,所有方法都表现出出色的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opinion mining in e-commerce: Evaluating machine learning approaches for sentiment analysis
In recent years, opinion mining has played a major role in analyzing text data from various sources such as Amazon, Capterra, Facebook, Google, GetApp, and Twitter. It enables companies to actively refine their business strategies. Sentiment analysis involves interpreting and classifying customer emotions (positive, neutral, and negative) expressed in reviews using sentiment analysis techniques such as BING and AFINN. This paper presents four approaches for customer review analysis and classification: the grade-based approach, content-based approach, content-based NRC-Emotion Lexicon approach, and collaborative approach. We employ three machine learning algorithms—stacking, random forest, and LogitBoost—to evaluate the performance of these approaches. A real-time dataset from Amazon product reviews is used for training and testing the model. Empirical results reveal that the collaborative approach outperforms the grade-based, content-based, and content-based NRC-Emotion Lexicon approaches across all three machine learning algorithms. Additionally, all approaches demonstrate outstanding performance when using the boosting algorithm for customer review classification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Results in Control and Optimization
Results in Control and Optimization Mathematics-Control and Optimization
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
91 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信