酷儿电子烟:对澳大利亚女同性恋、双性恋和酷儿女性使用电子烟的定性分析

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Ruby Grant , Adrian Farrugia , Isabel Mudford , Julie Mooney-Somers , Jennifer Power , Ruth McNair , Amy Pennay , Adam Bourne
{"title":"酷儿电子烟:对澳大利亚女同性恋、双性恋和酷儿女性使用电子烟的定性分析","authors":"Ruby Grant ,&nbsp;Adrian Farrugia ,&nbsp;Isabel Mudford ,&nbsp;Julie Mooney-Somers ,&nbsp;Jennifer Power ,&nbsp;Ruth McNair ,&nbsp;Amy Pennay ,&nbsp;Adam Bourne","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vaping has emerged as a prominent practice among lesbian, bisexual, and queer (LBQ) women in Australia. Despite its growing prevalence, the socio-cultural dimensions of vaping in LBQ communities remain underexplored. This study examines how vaping functions as a contested site of queer sociability, identity expression, and resistance. Using queer theoretical perspectives, we interrogate the ways LBQ women navigate the aesthetic, social, and political dimensions of vaping within Australia’s unique policy landscape.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty semi-structured interviews were conducted with LBQ cis and trans women and non-binary individuals aged 18–72 in Australia. A reflexive thematic analysis was employed, informed by queer theory, to explore participants’ accounts of vaping.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Participants framed vaping as a performative practice tied to queer aesthetics, gender expression, and community bonding. While vaping facilitated intimacy and sociability in queer spaces, its association with stigma and youth culture complicated its subversive potential for some. Vaping emerged as a mode of resistance to normative public health narratives, yet also reproduced tensions around deviance and identity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Vaping is a dynamic, contested queer practice, reflecting LBQ women’s negotiations of identity, community, and agency within restrictive policy environments. Policy and public health strategies must consider the queer socio-cultural meanings and community practices that shape vaping, to avoid reinforcing stigma and unintended harms to LGBTQ+ communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 104853"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Queering vaping: A qualitative analysis of lesbian, bisexual, and queer women’s E-cigarette use in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Ruby Grant ,&nbsp;Adrian Farrugia ,&nbsp;Isabel Mudford ,&nbsp;Julie Mooney-Somers ,&nbsp;Jennifer Power ,&nbsp;Ruth McNair ,&nbsp;Amy Pennay ,&nbsp;Adam Bourne\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vaping has emerged as a prominent practice among lesbian, bisexual, and queer (LBQ) women in Australia. Despite its growing prevalence, the socio-cultural dimensions of vaping in LBQ communities remain underexplored. This study examines how vaping functions as a contested site of queer sociability, identity expression, and resistance. Using queer theoretical perspectives, we interrogate the ways LBQ women navigate the aesthetic, social, and political dimensions of vaping within Australia’s unique policy landscape.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty semi-structured interviews were conducted with LBQ cis and trans women and non-binary individuals aged 18–72 in Australia. A reflexive thematic analysis was employed, informed by queer theory, to explore participants’ accounts of vaping.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Participants framed vaping as a performative practice tied to queer aesthetics, gender expression, and community bonding. While vaping facilitated intimacy and sociability in queer spaces, its association with stigma and youth culture complicated its subversive potential for some. Vaping emerged as a mode of resistance to normative public health narratives, yet also reproduced tensions around deviance and identity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Vaping is a dynamic, contested queer practice, reflecting LBQ women’s negotiations of identity, community, and agency within restrictive policy environments. Policy and public health strategies must consider the queer socio-cultural meanings and community practices that shape vaping, to avoid reinforcing stigma and unintended harms to LGBTQ+ communities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"volume\":\"142 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104853\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925001537\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925001537","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在澳大利亚的女同性恋、双性恋和酷儿(LBQ)女性中,dvaping已经成为一种突出的做法。尽管电子烟越来越流行,但LBQ社区的社会文化层面仍未得到充分探索。这项研究探讨了电子烟如何成为酷儿社交、身份表达和抵抗的一个有争议的场所。从酷儿理论的角度,我们探讨了LBQ女性在澳大利亚独特的政策环境下,如何在电子烟的美学、社会和政治层面上进行导航。方法对澳大利亚18-72岁的LBQ顺、变性女性和非二元性别人群进行了60次半结构化访谈。在酷儿理论的指导下,采用了反身性主题分析来探索参与者对电子烟的描述。参与者将电子烟视为一种与酷儿美学、性别表达和社区联系有关的表演实践。虽然电子烟促进了酷儿空间的亲密关系和社交,但它与耻辱和青年文化的联系使其颠覆性的潜力对一些人来说变得复杂。电子烟作为一种抵制规范公共卫生叙事的模式出现,但也再现了围绕越轨行为和身份的紧张关系。电子烟是一种动态的、有争议的酷儿行为,反映了LBQ女性在限制性政策环境下对身份、社区和代理的谈判。政策和公共卫生战略必须考虑影响电子烟的酷儿社会文化含义和社区习俗,以避免加剧对LGBTQ+社区的耻辱和意外伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Queering vaping: A qualitative analysis of lesbian, bisexual, and queer women’s E-cigarette use in Australia

Background

Vaping has emerged as a prominent practice among lesbian, bisexual, and queer (LBQ) women in Australia. Despite its growing prevalence, the socio-cultural dimensions of vaping in LBQ communities remain underexplored. This study examines how vaping functions as a contested site of queer sociability, identity expression, and resistance. Using queer theoretical perspectives, we interrogate the ways LBQ women navigate the aesthetic, social, and political dimensions of vaping within Australia’s unique policy landscape.

Methods

Sixty semi-structured interviews were conducted with LBQ cis and trans women and non-binary individuals aged 18–72 in Australia. A reflexive thematic analysis was employed, informed by queer theory, to explore participants’ accounts of vaping.

Findings

Participants framed vaping as a performative practice tied to queer aesthetics, gender expression, and community bonding. While vaping facilitated intimacy and sociability in queer spaces, its association with stigma and youth culture complicated its subversive potential for some. Vaping emerged as a mode of resistance to normative public health narratives, yet also reproduced tensions around deviance and identity.

Conclusion

Vaping is a dynamic, contested queer practice, reflecting LBQ women’s negotiations of identity, community, and agency within restrictive policy environments. Policy and public health strategies must consider the queer socio-cultural meanings and community practices that shape vaping, to avoid reinforcing stigma and unintended harms to LGBTQ+ communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信