Ismet Mirac Cakir , Uluhan Eryuruk , Enes Gurun , Tumay Bekci , Gokhan Tonkaz , Eser Bulut , Ali Kupeli , Serdar Aslan
{"title":"提高肾小肿块的诊断准确性:多参数MRI放射组学和透明细胞可能性评分的整合","authors":"Ismet Mirac Cakir , Uluhan Eryuruk , Enes Gurun , Tumay Bekci , Gokhan Tonkaz , Eser Bulut , Ali Kupeli , Serdar Aslan","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Accurate diagnosis of small renal masses is crucial for treatment planning. Combining radiomics analysis with the Clear Cell Likelihood Score (ccLS) in multiparametric MRI can effectively assess malignancy risk. This study aimed to evaluate the contribution of MRI-based radiomics analysis to the diagnostic performance of the ccLS in differentiating clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included patients with cT1a renal masses who underwent preoperative MRI and nephrectomy. Radiomic features were extracted from multiparametric MRI images, including T2-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging sequences. Qualitative assessment was performed using the ccLS version 2.0, based on multiparametric MRI findings. The diagnostic efficacies of the ccLS, radiomic analysis, and the combination of the two methods in differentiating ccRCCs were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 72 small renal masses (43 ccRCC and 29 non-ccRCC) from 68 patients were evaluated. Using ccLS alone, lesions classified as ccLS ≥ 4 were identified as ccRCCs with a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 73.3%. Radiomic analysis revealed significant differences between ccRCC and non-ccRCC lesions, with AUC values ranging from 0.48 to 0.87 across different features. The combined use of radiomic features and ccLS improved the differentiation of ccRCCs, achieving a sensitivity of 90.7%, specificity of 78.4%, and an AUC of 0.88. In lesions classified as ccLS 3 (equivocal), radiomic analysis alone distinguished ccRCCs with 100% sensitivity and 62.5% specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study’s findings demonstrated that radiomics analysis successfully differentiated lesions with a ccLS 3 and that the use of radiomic analysis in combination with ccLS successfully differentiated ccRCC and non-ccRCC lesions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 112174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the diagnostic accuracy of small renal masses: Integration of radiomics and clear cell likelihood scores in multiparametric MRI\",\"authors\":\"Ismet Mirac Cakir , Uluhan Eryuruk , Enes Gurun , Tumay Bekci , Gokhan Tonkaz , Eser Bulut , Ali Kupeli , Serdar Aslan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Accurate diagnosis of small renal masses is crucial for treatment planning. Combining radiomics analysis with the Clear Cell Likelihood Score (ccLS) in multiparametric MRI can effectively assess malignancy risk. This study aimed to evaluate the contribution of MRI-based radiomics analysis to the diagnostic performance of the ccLS in differentiating clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included patients with cT1a renal masses who underwent preoperative MRI and nephrectomy. Radiomic features were extracted from multiparametric MRI images, including T2-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging sequences. Qualitative assessment was performed using the ccLS version 2.0, based on multiparametric MRI findings. The diagnostic efficacies of the ccLS, radiomic analysis, and the combination of the two methods in differentiating ccRCCs were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 72 small renal masses (43 ccRCC and 29 non-ccRCC) from 68 patients were evaluated. Using ccLS alone, lesions classified as ccLS ≥ 4 were identified as ccRCCs with a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 73.3%. Radiomic analysis revealed significant differences between ccRCC and non-ccRCC lesions, with AUC values ranging from 0.48 to 0.87 across different features. The combined use of radiomic features and ccLS improved the differentiation of ccRCCs, achieving a sensitivity of 90.7%, specificity of 78.4%, and an AUC of 0.88. In lesions classified as ccLS 3 (equivocal), radiomic analysis alone distinguished ccRCCs with 100% sensitivity and 62.5% specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study’s findings demonstrated that radiomics analysis successfully differentiated lesions with a ccLS 3 and that the use of radiomic analysis in combination with ccLS successfully differentiated ccRCC and non-ccRCC lesions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25002608\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25002608","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving the diagnostic accuracy of small renal masses: Integration of radiomics and clear cell likelihood scores in multiparametric MRI
Objectives
Accurate diagnosis of small renal masses is crucial for treatment planning. Combining radiomics analysis with the Clear Cell Likelihood Score (ccLS) in multiparametric MRI can effectively assess malignancy risk. This study aimed to evaluate the contribution of MRI-based radiomics analysis to the diagnostic performance of the ccLS in differentiating clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC).
Materials and methods
This retrospective study included patients with cT1a renal masses who underwent preoperative MRI and nephrectomy. Radiomic features were extracted from multiparametric MRI images, including T2-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging sequences. Qualitative assessment was performed using the ccLS version 2.0, based on multiparametric MRI findings. The diagnostic efficacies of the ccLS, radiomic analysis, and the combination of the two methods in differentiating ccRCCs were analyzed.
Results
A total of 72 small renal masses (43 ccRCC and 29 non-ccRCC) from 68 patients were evaluated. Using ccLS alone, lesions classified as ccLS ≥ 4 were identified as ccRCCs with a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 73.3%. Radiomic analysis revealed significant differences between ccRCC and non-ccRCC lesions, with AUC values ranging from 0.48 to 0.87 across different features. The combined use of radiomic features and ccLS improved the differentiation of ccRCCs, achieving a sensitivity of 90.7%, specificity of 78.4%, and an AUC of 0.88. In lesions classified as ccLS 3 (equivocal), radiomic analysis alone distinguished ccRCCs with 100% sensitivity and 62.5% specificity.
Conclusions
This study’s findings demonstrated that radiomics analysis successfully differentiated lesions with a ccLS 3 and that the use of radiomic analysis in combination with ccLS successfully differentiated ccRCC and non-ccRCC lesions.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.