钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂的使用和2型糖尿病患者肝脏相关事件的风险:一项观察性队列研究的荟萃分析

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes Care Pub Date : 2025-05-20 DOI:10.2337/dc25-0282
Alessandro Mantovani, Riccardo Morandin, Maria Giovanna Lando, Veronica Fiorio, Grazia Pennisi, Salvatore Petta, Norbert Stefan, Herbert Tilg, Christopher D. Byrne, Giovanni Targher
{"title":"钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂的使用和2型糖尿病患者肝脏相关事件的风险:一项观察性队列研究的荟萃分析","authors":"Alessandro Mantovani, Riccardo Morandin, Maria Giovanna Lando, Veronica Fiorio, Grazia Pennisi, Salvatore Petta, Norbert Stefan, Herbert Tilg, Christopher D. Byrne, Giovanni Targher","doi":"10.2337/dc25-0282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND There is uncertainty regarding effect of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on the risk of major adverse liver-related outcomes (MALOs). PURPOSE We performed a meta-analysis of observational cohort studies to quantify the magnitude of the association between SGLT2 inhibitor use and risk of developing MALOs for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). DATA SOURCES We systematically reviewed three large electronic databases from inception to January 2025. STUDY SELECTION We included active-comparator, new-user cohort studies with comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors versus other glucose-lowering medications in patients with T2DM. DATA EXTRACTION The primary outcome was incidence rate of MALOs defined as a composite of hepatic decompensation events, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, or liver-related deaths. Secondary outcomes included each of the above as individual events. Meta-analysis was performed with random-effects models. DATA SYNTHESIS We identified eight cohort studies with aggregate data on 626,104 patients with T2DM (397,806 SGLT2 inhibitor new users and 228,298 new users of other glucose-lowering agents). During a median of 2.7 years, SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with significantly lower risk of MALOs (random-effects hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.95; I2 = 83.1%) and liver-related deaths (0.64, 0.50–0.82; I2 = 0%). The significant risk reduction in MALOs was observed in comparisons of SGLT2 inhibitors with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, metformin, or pioglitazone but not glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. Sensitivity analyses did not modify these results. A funnel plot did not show significant publication bias. LIMITATIONS Observational design of the cohort studies and high level of heterogeneity are the main limitations. CONCLUSIONS SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with lower risk of MALOs for patients with T2DM.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":"70 1","pages":"1042-1052"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Use and Risk of Liver-Related Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis of Observational Cohort Studies\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Mantovani, Riccardo Morandin, Maria Giovanna Lando, Veronica Fiorio, Grazia Pennisi, Salvatore Petta, Norbert Stefan, Herbert Tilg, Christopher D. Byrne, Giovanni Targher\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/dc25-0282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND There is uncertainty regarding effect of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on the risk of major adverse liver-related outcomes (MALOs). PURPOSE We performed a meta-analysis of observational cohort studies to quantify the magnitude of the association between SGLT2 inhibitor use and risk of developing MALOs for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). DATA SOURCES We systematically reviewed three large electronic databases from inception to January 2025. STUDY SELECTION We included active-comparator, new-user cohort studies with comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors versus other glucose-lowering medications in patients with T2DM. DATA EXTRACTION The primary outcome was incidence rate of MALOs defined as a composite of hepatic decompensation events, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, or liver-related deaths. Secondary outcomes included each of the above as individual events. Meta-analysis was performed with random-effects models. DATA SYNTHESIS We identified eight cohort studies with aggregate data on 626,104 patients with T2DM (397,806 SGLT2 inhibitor new users and 228,298 new users of other glucose-lowering agents). During a median of 2.7 years, SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with significantly lower risk of MALOs (random-effects hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.95; I2 = 83.1%) and liver-related deaths (0.64, 0.50–0.82; I2 = 0%). The significant risk reduction in MALOs was observed in comparisons of SGLT2 inhibitors with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, metformin, or pioglitazone but not glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. Sensitivity analyses did not modify these results. A funnel plot did not show significant publication bias. LIMITATIONS Observational design of the cohort studies and high level of heterogeneity are the main limitations. CONCLUSIONS SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with lower risk of MALOs for patients with T2DM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes Care\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"1042-1052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-0282\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-0282","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2 (SGLT2)抑制剂对主要肝脏相关不良结局(MALOs)风险的影响尚不确定。我们对观察性队列研究进行了荟萃分析,以量化2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者使用SGLT2抑制剂与发生malo风险之间的关联程度。我们系统地回顾了三个大型电子数据库从成立到2025年1月。研究选择我们纳入了主动比较者,新用户队列研究,比较了SGLT2抑制剂与其他降糖药物在T2DM患者中的应用。主要终点是MALOs的发生率,定义为肝失代偿事件、肝细胞癌、肝移植或肝脏相关死亡的复合。次要结局包括上述每个单独事件。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。我们确定了8项队列研究,汇总了626104例T2DM患者的数据(397,806例SGLT2抑制剂新使用者和228,298例其他降糖药新使用者)。在中位2.7年期间,SGLT2抑制剂的使用与MALOs的风险显著降低相关(随机效应风险比0.83,95% CI 0.72-0.95;I2 = 83.1%)和肝脏相关死亡(0.64,0.50-0.82;I2 = 0%)。在比较SGLT2抑制剂与二肽基肽酶4抑制剂、二甲双胍或吡格列酮时,观察到MALOs的显著风险降低,但胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂没有。敏感性分析没有改变这些结果。漏斗图未显示显著的发表偏倚。队列研究的观察设计和高水平的异质性是主要的局限性。结论:使用SGLT2抑制剂可降低T2DM患者发生malo的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Use and Risk of Liver-Related Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis of Observational Cohort Studies
BACKGROUND There is uncertainty regarding effect of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on the risk of major adverse liver-related outcomes (MALOs). PURPOSE We performed a meta-analysis of observational cohort studies to quantify the magnitude of the association between SGLT2 inhibitor use and risk of developing MALOs for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). DATA SOURCES We systematically reviewed three large electronic databases from inception to January 2025. STUDY SELECTION We included active-comparator, new-user cohort studies with comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors versus other glucose-lowering medications in patients with T2DM. DATA EXTRACTION The primary outcome was incidence rate of MALOs defined as a composite of hepatic decompensation events, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, or liver-related deaths. Secondary outcomes included each of the above as individual events. Meta-analysis was performed with random-effects models. DATA SYNTHESIS We identified eight cohort studies with aggregate data on 626,104 patients with T2DM (397,806 SGLT2 inhibitor new users and 228,298 new users of other glucose-lowering agents). During a median of 2.7 years, SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with significantly lower risk of MALOs (random-effects hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.95; I2 = 83.1%) and liver-related deaths (0.64, 0.50–0.82; I2 = 0%). The significant risk reduction in MALOs was observed in comparisons of SGLT2 inhibitors with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, metformin, or pioglitazone but not glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. Sensitivity analyses did not modify these results. A funnel plot did not show significant publication bias. LIMITATIONS Observational design of the cohort studies and high level of heterogeneity are the main limitations. CONCLUSIONS SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with lower risk of MALOs for patients with T2DM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Care
Diabetes Care 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
27.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
449
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes. Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信