{"title":"四肽治疗产妇硬脊膜穿刺后头痛无效果:一项双盲随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Mikhail Dziadzko,Lionel Bouvet,Nadia Steer,Célia Depaulis,Pierre Pradat,Fanny Joubert,Laure Lalande,Dominique Chassard,Frederic Aubrun","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPostdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common complication of neuraxial anaesthesia in obstetrics. Although epidural blood patch (EBP) remains the most effective treatment, less invasive alternatives are being explored. We assessed the efficacy and safety of tetracosactide, a synthetic adrenocorticotropic hormone analogue, for treating established PDPH in postpartum patients.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in two tertiary care maternal hospitals. Postpartum patients with PDPH after neuraxial anaesthesia were randomised to receive either tetracosactide 1 mg i.v. or placebo. The primary outcome was the rate of EBP within the 15-day follow-up. Secondary outcomes included headache duration and intensity, activity limitation, length of hospital stay, and the number of EBPs performed per patient. Interim analysis to determine futility and trial termination was planned at 50% enrolment.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAt interim analysis with 44 patients enrolled (23 in the treatment group and 21 in the placebo group) no significant difference was found for the primary outcome: 21 (91%) patients in the treatment group and 18 (86%) patients in the placebo group received EBP (P=0.6575). Secondary outcomes were comparable between groups, except for a 1-day longer hospital stay in the treatment group (P=0.0486). The study was terminated because of futility. No side-effects of tetracosactide administration were observed.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nA single dose of tetracosactide did not demonstrate efficacy in preventing EBP needs in postpartum PDPH, and there was no effect on the intensity, duration of headaches, and physical activity limitations. Given these findings, adrenocorticotropic hormone analogues should not be considered for this indication.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION\r\nEuropean Union Clinical Trials Register (2015-003357-17); ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02813655); French Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (160214A-31).","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No effect of tetracosactide for treatment of postdural puncture headaches in parturient women: a double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mikhail Dziadzko,Lionel Bouvet,Nadia Steer,Célia Depaulis,Pierre Pradat,Fanny Joubert,Laure Lalande,Dominique Chassard,Frederic Aubrun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nPostdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common complication of neuraxial anaesthesia in obstetrics. Although epidural blood patch (EBP) remains the most effective treatment, less invasive alternatives are being explored. We assessed the efficacy and safety of tetracosactide, a synthetic adrenocorticotropic hormone analogue, for treating established PDPH in postpartum patients.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nA randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in two tertiary care maternal hospitals. Postpartum patients with PDPH after neuraxial anaesthesia were randomised to receive either tetracosactide 1 mg i.v. or placebo. The primary outcome was the rate of EBP within the 15-day follow-up. Secondary outcomes included headache duration and intensity, activity limitation, length of hospital stay, and the number of EBPs performed per patient. Interim analysis to determine futility and trial termination was planned at 50% enrolment.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nAt interim analysis with 44 patients enrolled (23 in the treatment group and 21 in the placebo group) no significant difference was found for the primary outcome: 21 (91%) patients in the treatment group and 18 (86%) patients in the placebo group received EBP (P=0.6575). Secondary outcomes were comparable between groups, except for a 1-day longer hospital stay in the treatment group (P=0.0486). The study was terminated because of futility. No side-effects of tetracosactide administration were observed.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nA single dose of tetracosactide did not demonstrate efficacy in preventing EBP needs in postpartum PDPH, and there was no effect on the intensity, duration of headaches, and physical activity limitations. Given these findings, adrenocorticotropic hormone analogues should not be considered for this indication.\\r\\n\\r\\nCLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION\\r\\nEuropean Union Clinical Trials Register (2015-003357-17); ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02813655); French Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (160214A-31).\",\"PeriodicalId\":9250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.012\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
No effect of tetracosactide for treatment of postdural puncture headaches in parturient women: a double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial.
BACKGROUND
Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common complication of neuraxial anaesthesia in obstetrics. Although epidural blood patch (EBP) remains the most effective treatment, less invasive alternatives are being explored. We assessed the efficacy and safety of tetracosactide, a synthetic adrenocorticotropic hormone analogue, for treating established PDPH in postpartum patients.
METHODS
A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in two tertiary care maternal hospitals. Postpartum patients with PDPH after neuraxial anaesthesia were randomised to receive either tetracosactide 1 mg i.v. or placebo. The primary outcome was the rate of EBP within the 15-day follow-up. Secondary outcomes included headache duration and intensity, activity limitation, length of hospital stay, and the number of EBPs performed per patient. Interim analysis to determine futility and trial termination was planned at 50% enrolment.
RESULTS
At interim analysis with 44 patients enrolled (23 in the treatment group and 21 in the placebo group) no significant difference was found for the primary outcome: 21 (91%) patients in the treatment group and 18 (86%) patients in the placebo group received EBP (P=0.6575). Secondary outcomes were comparable between groups, except for a 1-day longer hospital stay in the treatment group (P=0.0486). The study was terminated because of futility. No side-effects of tetracosactide administration were observed.
CONCLUSIONS
A single dose of tetracosactide did not demonstrate efficacy in preventing EBP needs in postpartum PDPH, and there was no effect on the intensity, duration of headaches, and physical activity limitations. Given these findings, adrenocorticotropic hormone analogues should not be considered for this indication.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
European Union Clinical Trials Register (2015-003357-17); ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02813655); French Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (160214A-31).
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience.
The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence.
Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.