Maria A Pabon,Orly Vardeny,Muthiah Vaduganathan,Akshay S Desai,Brian L Claggett,Ian J Kulac,Pardeep S Jhund,Carolyn S P Lam,Michele Senni,Sanjiv J Shah,Adriaan A Voors,Faiez Zannad,Bertram Pitt,Clara I Saldarriaga,Mark C Petrie,Béla Merkely,Maria Borentain,Katharina Mueller,Prabhakar Viswanathan,Flaviana Amarante,Alanna Morris,John J V McMurray,Scott D Solomon
{"title":"芬芬烯酮治疗心力衰竭并改善射血分数:finhearts - hf随机临床试验。","authors":"Maria A Pabon,Orly Vardeny,Muthiah Vaduganathan,Akshay S Desai,Brian L Claggett,Ian J Kulac,Pardeep S Jhund,Carolyn S P Lam,Michele Senni,Sanjiv J Shah,Adriaan A Voors,Faiez Zannad,Bertram Pitt,Clara I Saldarriaga,Mark C Petrie,Béla Merkely,Maria Borentain,Katharina Mueller,Prabhakar Viswanathan,Flaviana Amarante,Alanna Morris,John J V McMurray,Scott D Solomon","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2025.1101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nPatients with chronic heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40% who experience LVEF improvement to 40% or higher (HFimpEF) may still face residual risks.\r\n\r\nObjective\r\nTo assess the clinical profiles, risk, and treatment response to finerenone in participants with HFimpEF.\r\n\r\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\r\nA total of 6001 patients with HE, LVEF of 40% or higher, New York Heart Association class II to IV symptoms, and elevated natriuretic peptide levels, were enrolled between September 14, 2020, and January 10, 2023. Patients with a prior history of LVEF less than 40% were included. Data analysis was conducted between September 1 to December 10, 2024.\r\n\r\nIntervention\r\nParticipants received finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo.\r\n\r\nMain Outcomes and Measures\r\nThe primary end point was the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and total (first and recurrent) worsening HF events.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nOf the 6001 participants (mean [SD] age, 72 [9.7], years; 3269 male [55%]), 273 (5%) had a prior LVEF less than 40%. Among those with a prior LVEF of less than 40%, the median recorded prior LVEF was 35% [IQR, 30%-37%], with a median improvement of 12% [IQR, 8%-17%]. Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years, those with a history of LVEF of less than 40% experienced higher rates of the primary outcome of a composite of CV death and worsening of HF events (21.4 per 100 patient-years vs 16.0 per 100 patient-years) than did those whose LVEF was consistently 40% or higher. After adjustment for clinically relevant covariates; however, this rate ratio (RR) was not statistically different (absolute RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.85-1.49, P = .39). The treatment effect of finerenone on the primary outcome was consistent among those with a history of LVEF less than 40% and those with LVEF that was consistently 40% or higher (P for interaction = .36). Owing to higher baseline risk, the absolute risk reduction was greater among those with HFimpEF (9.2 vs 2.5 per 100 patient-years). Patients with HFimpEF tended to develop more hypotension with finerenone treatment, but otherwise, the safety profile of finerenone was similar in patients with and without previous LVEF less than 40%.\r\n\r\nConclusions and Relevance\r\nIn this prespecified analysis of a randomized clinical trial, patients with HFimpEF remained at high risk of CV events, underscoring the need for continued management despite LVEF improvement. The treatment benefits of finerenone observed among the overall population of patients with HF with preserved EF were consistent among patients with HFimpEF.\r\n\r\nTrial Registration\r\nClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finerenone in Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction: The FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Maria A Pabon,Orly Vardeny,Muthiah Vaduganathan,Akshay S Desai,Brian L Claggett,Ian J Kulac,Pardeep S Jhund,Carolyn S P Lam,Michele Senni,Sanjiv J Shah,Adriaan A Voors,Faiez Zannad,Bertram Pitt,Clara I Saldarriaga,Mark C Petrie,Béla Merkely,Maria Borentain,Katharina Mueller,Prabhakar Viswanathan,Flaviana Amarante,Alanna Morris,John J V McMurray,Scott D Solomon\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamacardio.2025.1101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Importance\\r\\nPatients with chronic heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40% who experience LVEF improvement to 40% or higher (HFimpEF) may still face residual risks.\\r\\n\\r\\nObjective\\r\\nTo assess the clinical profiles, risk, and treatment response to finerenone in participants with HFimpEF.\\r\\n\\r\\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\\r\\nA total of 6001 patients with HE, LVEF of 40% or higher, New York Heart Association class II to IV symptoms, and elevated natriuretic peptide levels, were enrolled between September 14, 2020, and January 10, 2023. Patients with a prior history of LVEF less than 40% were included. Data analysis was conducted between September 1 to December 10, 2024.\\r\\n\\r\\nIntervention\\r\\nParticipants received finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo.\\r\\n\\r\\nMain Outcomes and Measures\\r\\nThe primary end point was the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and total (first and recurrent) worsening HF events.\\r\\n\\r\\nResults\\r\\nOf the 6001 participants (mean [SD] age, 72 [9.7], years; 3269 male [55%]), 273 (5%) had a prior LVEF less than 40%. Among those with a prior LVEF of less than 40%, the median recorded prior LVEF was 35% [IQR, 30%-37%], with a median improvement of 12% [IQR, 8%-17%]. Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years, those with a history of LVEF of less than 40% experienced higher rates of the primary outcome of a composite of CV death and worsening of HF events (21.4 per 100 patient-years vs 16.0 per 100 patient-years) than did those whose LVEF was consistently 40% or higher. After adjustment for clinically relevant covariates; however, this rate ratio (RR) was not statistically different (absolute RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.85-1.49, P = .39). The treatment effect of finerenone on the primary outcome was consistent among those with a history of LVEF less than 40% and those with LVEF that was consistently 40% or higher (P for interaction = .36). Owing to higher baseline risk, the absolute risk reduction was greater among those with HFimpEF (9.2 vs 2.5 per 100 patient-years). Patients with HFimpEF tended to develop more hypotension with finerenone treatment, but otherwise, the safety profile of finerenone was similar in patients with and without previous LVEF less than 40%.\\r\\n\\r\\nConclusions and Relevance\\r\\nIn this prespecified analysis of a randomized clinical trial, patients with HFimpEF remained at high risk of CV events, underscoring the need for continued management despite LVEF improvement. The treatment benefits of finerenone observed among the overall population of patients with HF with preserved EF were consistent among patients with HFimpEF.\\r\\n\\r\\nTrial Registration\\r\\nClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA cardiology\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2025.1101\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2025.1101","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Finerenone in Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction: The FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.
Importance
Patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40% who experience LVEF improvement to 40% or higher (HFimpEF) may still face residual risks.
Objective
To assess the clinical profiles, risk, and treatment response to finerenone in participants with HFimpEF.
Design, Setting, and Participants
A total of 6001 patients with HE, LVEF of 40% or higher, New York Heart Association class II to IV symptoms, and elevated natriuretic peptide levels, were enrolled between September 14, 2020, and January 10, 2023. Patients with a prior history of LVEF less than 40% were included. Data analysis was conducted between September 1 to December 10, 2024.
Intervention
Participants received finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo.
Main Outcomes and Measures
The primary end point was the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and total (first and recurrent) worsening HF events.
Results
Of the 6001 participants (mean [SD] age, 72 [9.7], years; 3269 male [55%]), 273 (5%) had a prior LVEF less than 40%. Among those with a prior LVEF of less than 40%, the median recorded prior LVEF was 35% [IQR, 30%-37%], with a median improvement of 12% [IQR, 8%-17%]. Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years, those with a history of LVEF of less than 40% experienced higher rates of the primary outcome of a composite of CV death and worsening of HF events (21.4 per 100 patient-years vs 16.0 per 100 patient-years) than did those whose LVEF was consistently 40% or higher. After adjustment for clinically relevant covariates; however, this rate ratio (RR) was not statistically different (absolute RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.85-1.49, P = .39). The treatment effect of finerenone on the primary outcome was consistent among those with a history of LVEF less than 40% and those with LVEF that was consistently 40% or higher (P for interaction = .36). Owing to higher baseline risk, the absolute risk reduction was greater among those with HFimpEF (9.2 vs 2.5 per 100 patient-years). Patients with HFimpEF tended to develop more hypotension with finerenone treatment, but otherwise, the safety profile of finerenone was similar in patients with and without previous LVEF less than 40%.
Conclusions and Relevance
In this prespecified analysis of a randomized clinical trial, patients with HFimpEF remained at high risk of CV events, underscoring the need for continued management despite LVEF improvement. The treatment benefits of finerenone observed among the overall population of patients with HF with preserved EF were consistent among patients with HFimpEF.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.
JAMA cardiologyMedicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
45.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
264
期刊介绍:
JAMA Cardiology, an international peer-reviewed journal, serves as the premier publication for clinical investigators, clinicians, and trainees in cardiovascular medicine worldwide. As a member of the JAMA Network, it aligns with a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
Published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues annually, JAMA Cardiology attracts over 4.3 million annual article views and downloads. Research articles become freely accessible online 12 months post-publication without any author fees. Moreover, the online version is readily accessible to institutions in developing countries through the World Health Organization's HINARI program.
Positioned at the intersection of clinical investigation, actionable clinical science, and clinical practice, JAMA Cardiology prioritizes traditional and evolving cardiovascular medicine, alongside evidence-based health policy. It places particular emphasis on health equity, especially when grounded in original science, as a top editorial priority.