面部疼痛表情观察者量表对恢复室急性术后疼痛有显著预测作用。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Stefan Lautenbacher, Niklas Ceynowa, Makaras Burlakovas, Philip Lang, Miriam Kunz
{"title":"面部疼痛表情观察者量表对恢复室急性术后疼痛有显著预测作用。","authors":"Stefan Lautenbacher, Niklas Ceynowa, Makaras Burlakovas, Philip Lang, Miriam Kunz","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Immediately after surgery and general anesthesia patients may experience periods of dizziness, disorientation and sedation, which can hinder valid pain reports. Observational pain assessment, especially focusing on the face, may add to the subjective pain report in the recovery room. With the present study we wanted to put this assumption to test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>63 patients wo had undergone a wide range of surgical procedures under general anesthesia were observed twice: 10 and 40 minutes after arrival in the recovery room. At these two time points, a trained examiner observed the patients' facial expression and filled out the face items of the Brief Pain Scale non intubated (BPS-NI) and of the Pain and Impaired Cognition15 (PAIC-15) scale. After that, a nurse asked the patients to rate their pain on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both time points, the observer scales significantly predicted NRS ratings, with the BPS-NI being slightly superior (moderate/strong effect sizes) compared to the PAIC-15 (small/moderate effect sizes). On a group level, observational pain assessment showed a decrease in pain across the two time points, whereas NRS ratings remained stable. Despite this disparity, individual changes in pain ratings between the two time points were also significantly predicted by changes in both observer scales (moderate effect sizes).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In the recovery room, observational pain assessment can serve as a valid predictor of subjective pain. Thus, in cases where the validity of the pain report may be hampered, especially the face item of the BPI-NI may give substituting information about acute post-operative pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observer Scales of Facial Pain Expression Can Significantly Predict Acute Postoperative Pain in the Recovery Room.\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Lautenbacher, Niklas Ceynowa, Makaras Burlakovas, Philip Lang, Miriam Kunz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Immediately after surgery and general anesthesia patients may experience periods of dizziness, disorientation and sedation, which can hinder valid pain reports. Observational pain assessment, especially focusing on the face, may add to the subjective pain report in the recovery room. With the present study we wanted to put this assumption to test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>63 patients wo had undergone a wide range of surgical procedures under general anesthesia were observed twice: 10 and 40 minutes after arrival in the recovery room. At these two time points, a trained examiner observed the patients' facial expression and filled out the face items of the Brief Pain Scale non intubated (BPS-NI) and of the Pain and Impaired Cognition15 (PAIC-15) scale. After that, a nurse asked the patients to rate their pain on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both time points, the observer scales significantly predicted NRS ratings, with the BPS-NI being slightly superior (moderate/strong effect sizes) compared to the PAIC-15 (small/moderate effect sizes). On a group level, observational pain assessment showed a decrease in pain across the two time points, whereas NRS ratings remained stable. Despite this disparity, individual changes in pain ratings between the two time points were also significantly predicted by changes in both observer scales (moderate effect sizes).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In the recovery room, observational pain assessment can serve as a valid predictor of subjective pain. Thus, in cases where the validity of the pain report may be hampered, especially the face item of the BPI-NI may give substituting information about acute post-operative pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001300\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在手术和全身麻醉后,患者可能会经历一段时间的头晕、定向障碍和镇静,这可能会妨碍有效的疼痛报告。观察性疼痛评估,尤其是面部疼痛评估,可能会增加康复室的主观疼痛报告。在目前的研究中,我们想对这一假设进行检验。方法:对63例全麻下行大范围手术的患者,分别在到达恢复室后10分钟和40分钟进行两次观察。在这两个时间点,由一名训练有素的审查员观察患者的面部表情,并填写非插管简短疼痛量表(BPS-NI)和疼痛与认知障碍量表(PAIC-15)的面部项目。之后,一名护士要求病人用数字评定量表(NRS)对他们的疼痛进行评分。结果:在两个时间点,观察者量表显著预测NRS评分,与PAIC-15(小/中等效应量)相比,BPS-NI略优于PAIC-15(中等/中等效应量)。在组水平上,观察性疼痛评估显示疼痛在两个时间点上有所减少,而NRS评分保持稳定。尽管存在这种差异,但两个时间点之间疼痛评分的个体变化也可以通过两种观察者量表的变化(中等效应大小)来显著预测。讨论:在康复室,观察性疼痛评估可以作为主观疼痛的有效预测因子。因此,在疼痛报告的有效性可能受到阻碍的情况下,特别是BPI-NI的面部项目可能会提供关于急性术后疼痛的替代信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Observer Scales of Facial Pain Expression Can Significantly Predict Acute Postoperative Pain in the Recovery Room.

Objectives: Immediately after surgery and general anesthesia patients may experience periods of dizziness, disorientation and sedation, which can hinder valid pain reports. Observational pain assessment, especially focusing on the face, may add to the subjective pain report in the recovery room. With the present study we wanted to put this assumption to test.

Methods: 63 patients wo had undergone a wide range of surgical procedures under general anesthesia were observed twice: 10 and 40 minutes after arrival in the recovery room. At these two time points, a trained examiner observed the patients' facial expression and filled out the face items of the Brief Pain Scale non intubated (BPS-NI) and of the Pain and Impaired Cognition15 (PAIC-15) scale. After that, a nurse asked the patients to rate their pain on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).

Results: For both time points, the observer scales significantly predicted NRS ratings, with the BPS-NI being slightly superior (moderate/strong effect sizes) compared to the PAIC-15 (small/moderate effect sizes). On a group level, observational pain assessment showed a decrease in pain across the two time points, whereas NRS ratings remained stable. Despite this disparity, individual changes in pain ratings between the two time points were also significantly predicted by changes in both observer scales (moderate effect sizes).

Discussion: In the recovery room, observational pain assessment can serve as a valid predictor of subjective pain. Thus, in cases where the validity of the pain report may be hampered, especially the face item of the BPI-NI may give substituting information about acute post-operative pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信