三维打印前颈椎独立联合Cage-Plate-300连续医用植入物。

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Mosope Soda, Bradley Moatz, Paul Asdourian, Daina Brooks, Bryan Cunningham, Paul C McAfee
{"title":"三维打印前颈椎独立联合Cage-Plate-300连续医用植入物。","authors":"Mosope Soda, Bradley Moatz, Paul Asdourian, Daina Brooks, Bryan Cunningham, Paul C McAfee","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective was to investigate the perioperative parameters and clinical outcomes of a novel three-dimensional (3D) printed titanium interbody spacer and integral screws. The secondary objective was to compare the survivorship rate of the 3D-printed titanium integrated spacer (3D-printed spacer group) with that of a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) integrated spacer (PEEK group) and traditional allograft spacer combined with an anterior cervical plate (control group).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a retrospective study comprising 157 consecutive patients (representing 300 surgical levels) investigating the perioperative and clinical outcomes of a novel 3D-printed titanium integrated spacer for anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive series of 157 patients (N = 300 surgical levels) presenting with cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy, or spondylosis underwent ACDF with the 3D-printed titanium spacer. Perioperative outcomes including surgical time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and number of surgical levels were collected. Clinical outcomes including the American Spinal Injury Association neurologic impairment score and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Survivorship was defined as no failures, no anterior revision surgeries, no instrumentation removals, and no subsidence requiring surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean surgical time for the 3D-printed spacer group was 126.3 ± 34.0 minutes, the estimated blood loss was 85.9 ± 30.5 cc, and the length of hospital stay was 1.5 ± 1.4 days. Surgical levels were distributed as follows: 33.8% single-level, 42.7% two-level, 21.6% three-level, and 1.9% four-level ACDF procedures. 98.7% of patients in the 3D-printed spacer group reported improved American Spinal Injury Association scores. The mean NDI preoperatively was 37.2 ± 18.7, and the mean NDI postoperatively was 21.2 ± 18.3, with 58.6% of patients reporting NDI improvement of 15% or greater. Survivorship was observed in 97.4% of patients in the 3D-printed spacer group, 98.0% in the PEEK group, and 93.3% in the control group (chi-square analysis: X2 [1, N = 1529] = 16.9, P = 0.0002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A novel 3D-printed titanium spacer with integral screws for ACDF demonstrated improved survivorship rates compared with the traditional allograft spacer and anterior plate. Among 157 patients, only two required supplemental posterior fixation, one required removal for excessive kyphosis and were successfully revised with a 3D-printed corpectomy spacer, and one had notable subsidence at 6 weeks postoperatively (4 total failures based on the survivorship criteria; 97.4% survivorship success rate (153/157 patients)). Not a single case of neurologic progression was observed in the 3D-printed spacer group-no iatrogenic progressive radiculopathy nor myelopathy, unlike the control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-Dimensional Printed Anterior Cervical Standalone Combined Cage-Plate-300 Consecutive Medical Implants.\",\"authors\":\"Mosope Soda, Bradley Moatz, Paul Asdourian, Daina Brooks, Bryan Cunningham, Paul C McAfee\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective was to investigate the perioperative parameters and clinical outcomes of a novel three-dimensional (3D) printed titanium interbody spacer and integral screws. The secondary objective was to compare the survivorship rate of the 3D-printed titanium integrated spacer (3D-printed spacer group) with that of a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) integrated spacer (PEEK group) and traditional allograft spacer combined with an anterior cervical plate (control group).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a retrospective study comprising 157 consecutive patients (representing 300 surgical levels) investigating the perioperative and clinical outcomes of a novel 3D-printed titanium integrated spacer for anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive series of 157 patients (N = 300 surgical levels) presenting with cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy, or spondylosis underwent ACDF with the 3D-printed titanium spacer. Perioperative outcomes including surgical time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and number of surgical levels were collected. Clinical outcomes including the American Spinal Injury Association neurologic impairment score and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Survivorship was defined as no failures, no anterior revision surgeries, no instrumentation removals, and no subsidence requiring surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean surgical time for the 3D-printed spacer group was 126.3 ± 34.0 minutes, the estimated blood loss was 85.9 ± 30.5 cc, and the length of hospital stay was 1.5 ± 1.4 days. Surgical levels were distributed as follows: 33.8% single-level, 42.7% two-level, 21.6% three-level, and 1.9% four-level ACDF procedures. 98.7% of patients in the 3D-printed spacer group reported improved American Spinal Injury Association scores. The mean NDI preoperatively was 37.2 ± 18.7, and the mean NDI postoperatively was 21.2 ± 18.3, with 58.6% of patients reporting NDI improvement of 15% or greater. Survivorship was observed in 97.4% of patients in the 3D-printed spacer group, 98.0% in the PEEK group, and 93.3% in the control group (chi-square analysis: X2 [1, N = 1529] = 16.9, P = 0.0002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A novel 3D-printed titanium spacer with integral screws for ACDF demonstrated improved survivorship rates compared with the traditional allograft spacer and anterior plate. Among 157 patients, only two required supplemental posterior fixation, one required removal for excessive kyphosis and were successfully revised with a 3D-printed corpectomy spacer, and one had notable subsidence at 6 weeks postoperatively (4 total failures based on the survivorship criteria; 97.4% survivorship success rate (153/157 patients)). Not a single case of neurologic progression was observed in the 3D-printed spacer group-no iatrogenic progressive radiculopathy nor myelopathy, unlike the control group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086781/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:主要目的是研究一种新型三维(3D)打印钛体间间隔器和整体螺钉的围手术期参数和临床效果。次要目的是比较3d打印钛集成间隔器(3d打印间隔器组)与聚醚醚酮(PEEK)集成间隔器(PEEK组)和传统同种异体移植间隔器联合颈椎前板(对照组)的生存率。研究设计:这是一项回顾性研究,包括157名连续患者(代表300个手术级别),研究新型3d打印钛集成垫片用于颈前盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)的围手术期和临床结果。方法:连续157例(N = 300个手术水平)出现颈椎神经根病、脊髓病或颈椎病的患者使用3d打印钛垫片进行ACDF。收集围手术期结果,包括手术时间、估计失血量、住院时间和手术水平。临床结果包括术前和术后美国脊髓损伤协会神经损伤评分和颈部残疾指数(NDI)。生存期的定义为没有失败,没有前路翻修手术,没有器械移除,没有需要手术的下沉。结果:3d打印垫片组平均手术时间126.3±34.0 min,预估失血量85.9±30.5 cc,住院时间1.5±1.4 d。手术水平分布如下:单级ACDF手术33.8%,二级ACDF手术42.7%,三级ACDF手术21.6%,四级ACDF手术1.9%。98.7%的3d打印垫片组患者报告了美国脊髓损伤协会评分的提高。术前平均NDI为37.2±18.7,术后平均NDI为21.2±18.3,58.6%的患者报告NDI改善15%及以上。3d打印垫片组患者的生存率为97.4%,PEEK组为98.0%,对照组为93.3% (χ 2分析:X2 [1, N = 1529] = 16.9, P = 0.0002)。结论:与传统的同种异体植骨垫片和前钢板相比,一种新型的3d打印集成螺钉钛垫片用于ACDF具有更高的生存率。在157例患者中,只有2例需要补充后路固定,1例需要移除过度后凸,并成功地使用3d打印的椎体切除术间隔器进行矫正,1例在术后6周出现明显的下沉(根据生存标准,共有4例失败;生存成功率97.4%(153/157例))。与对照组不同,3d打印垫片组未观察到一例神经系统进展——无医源性进行性神经根病或脊髓病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three-Dimensional Printed Anterior Cervical Standalone Combined Cage-Plate-300 Consecutive Medical Implants.

Objective: The primary objective was to investigate the perioperative parameters and clinical outcomes of a novel three-dimensional (3D) printed titanium interbody spacer and integral screws. The secondary objective was to compare the survivorship rate of the 3D-printed titanium integrated spacer (3D-printed spacer group) with that of a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) integrated spacer (PEEK group) and traditional allograft spacer combined with an anterior cervical plate (control group).

Study design: This is a retrospective study comprising 157 consecutive patients (representing 300 surgical levels) investigating the perioperative and clinical outcomes of a novel 3D-printed titanium integrated spacer for anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF).

Methods: A consecutive series of 157 patients (N = 300 surgical levels) presenting with cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy, or spondylosis underwent ACDF with the 3D-printed titanium spacer. Perioperative outcomes including surgical time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and number of surgical levels were collected. Clinical outcomes including the American Spinal Injury Association neurologic impairment score and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Survivorship was defined as no failures, no anterior revision surgeries, no instrumentation removals, and no subsidence requiring surgery.

Results: The mean surgical time for the 3D-printed spacer group was 126.3 ± 34.0 minutes, the estimated blood loss was 85.9 ± 30.5 cc, and the length of hospital stay was 1.5 ± 1.4 days. Surgical levels were distributed as follows: 33.8% single-level, 42.7% two-level, 21.6% three-level, and 1.9% four-level ACDF procedures. 98.7% of patients in the 3D-printed spacer group reported improved American Spinal Injury Association scores. The mean NDI preoperatively was 37.2 ± 18.7, and the mean NDI postoperatively was 21.2 ± 18.3, with 58.6% of patients reporting NDI improvement of 15% or greater. Survivorship was observed in 97.4% of patients in the 3D-printed spacer group, 98.0% in the PEEK group, and 93.3% in the control group (chi-square analysis: X2 [1, N = 1529] = 16.9, P = 0.0002).

Conclusion: A novel 3D-printed titanium spacer with integral screws for ACDF demonstrated improved survivorship rates compared with the traditional allograft spacer and anterior plate. Among 157 patients, only two required supplemental posterior fixation, one required removal for excessive kyphosis and were successfully revised with a 3D-printed corpectomy spacer, and one had notable subsidence at 6 weeks postoperatively (4 total failures based on the survivorship criteria; 97.4% survivorship success rate (153/157 patients)). Not a single case of neurologic progression was observed in the 3D-printed spacer group-no iatrogenic progressive radiculopathy nor myelopathy, unlike the control group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信